Where is the Chinese translation of Zola's I Accuse?

Zola, 1898 65438+ 10/3.

Madam President:

In order to thank you for your friendly and cordial attitude when you met me, can you allow me to express my concern for your well-deserved reputation? Can I tell you that although the number of military stars on your military emblem is increasing, it is stained with the most shameful and indelible stain and is in danger of fading.

Notorious slander didn't hurt you, but won the hearts of the people. You are the center of our worship, because for France, the alliance with Russia is a patriotic celebration. Now, you will be responsible for global affairs. What a solemn victory it is, crowning the century of our great efforts, truth and freedom. However, the nasty Dreyfus incident has tarnished your reputation (I was going to say that it has tarnished your political achievements). The military court was ordered to acquit people like Esteban, and truth and justice were slapped. It's too late now, and France has lost face. History will record that such a crime endangering society occurred during your presidency.

Since they dare to do so, which is good, I should be fearless and tell the truth. Because I promised that if our judicial system-this incident happened through normal channels-didn't tell the truth, I would tell all the truth. It is my responsibility to speak out loudly, and I don't want to be an accomplice; If I become an accomplice, the ghost of an innocent person tortured in the distance-he suffered the most horrible torture for a crime he never committed-will haunt me at night.

Madam President, I want to tell you loudly the truth that makes honest people strongly dislike. Based on your reputation, I'm sure you didn't find the truth. You are the supreme head of state of France. Besides you, who should I reprimand for those who really commit crimes?

The first is the truth of Dreyfus' trial and his sentence.

An evil man led and completed all this: Colonel Patty. He was just a major. He was the whole Dreyfus incident. We won't understand the Dreyfus incident until an impartial investigation clearly determines his actions and responsibilities. He seems difficult to talk to, complicated in mind, scheming, addicted to using low-level novel means-a mysterious woman, stealing documents and anonymous letters, meeting in deserted places, and selling harmful evidence at night. It was his idea to say that Dreyfus wrote the memo; It was also his idea to check the documents in a room full of mirrors. Major Zinetti told us that Patty entered the prisoner's sleeping cell with an unlit lantern, and suddenly shot the light on the prisoner's face, with the intention of making the frightened prisoner confess without psychological preparation. There are many things that can be exposed, but this is not my responsibility; Let them investigate, let them find. I can only simply say that Patty is in charge of investigating the Dreyfus case with the authority of a criminal police officer. From the sequence and level of events, he must bear the greatest responsibility for this misjudged case.

Colonel Sandherr, the intelligence chief who died of paralysis, has been holding memos for some time. There have been cases of "information leakage" and file loss before, just as there is still no such thing today. When someone gradually suspected that the memorandum could only be written by officers of the artillery regiment of the General Staff, the authorities tried to find this person. This is an obvious double mistake, which shows that the inspection of the memo is superficial, because careful and reasonable inspection can confirm that only infantry officers can write this memo.

Therefore, they thoroughly searched the aforementioned scope; They checked the handwriting samples as if it were a family dispute. They thought they would find a traitor in their office and then fire him. Since we are all familiar with this part of the plot, I don't want to repeat it, but when Major Patty started to participate, Dreyfus was immediately suspected; From then on, Patty framed Dreyfus, and the incident became "his" incident. He is sure that he can embarrass the traitor and squeeze a complete confession out of him. Of course, there is also General messier, the Secretary of the Army, who seems to have average intelligence; There is also General Boide Fleur, the chief of staff, who seems to be influenced by strong religious teachings; General Gong Si, the deputy chief of staff, was driven by conscience and was more open-minded in handling the incident. However, the development of the incident was started by Patty alone. He leads people by the nose and hypnotizes them. Yes, he also plays spiritualism and mysticism, and talks to ghosts. The experiment he imposed on the unfortunate Dreyfus and all the crazy torture methods-setting confession traps, stupid investigations, absurd forged documents-are unbelievable.

Ah, that's a nightmare for those who are familiar with the previous plot! Major Patty arrested Dreyfus and put him in a solitary cell. He immediately ran to Dreyfus' house to intimidate Mrs. Dreyfus. If she said anything to the outside world, she would lose her husband. At the same time, the unfortunate man was pulling his hair and shouting injustice. Torture was going on as recorded in15th century, covered with a mysterious smoke screen and accompanied by a lot of rude means. The accusation is completely based on a stupid memo, and that naive accusation is not only a fairly common treason, but also the most despicable fraud, because almost all the so-called secrets given to the enemy are worthless. I emphasize this point, because it is the gateway to incite the real crime-a terrible judicial error that tarnishes the reputation of France. I want to point out completely and clearly how the judicial error happened, how Major Patty personally made this error, and how General messier, General Boide Fleur and General Gong Si were fooled by him, so that they later had to take responsibility for this error, and further felt that they had the responsibility to protect it and regarded it as a sacred truth that could not be discussed. At first, their mistakes were negligence and ignorance. Worst of all, they succumbed to the religious fanaticism in their own circles and the prejudice brought by the military spirit, and indulged in ignorance.

Now, Dreyfus has been summoned to a military court for trial, and everything is required to be kept secret. If the traitor really opened our national defense border for the enemy and let the German emperor go straight to Notre Dame de Paris, the military court would not be able to force stricter silence, but would be tougher and more mysterious. Now the whole country is in a state of shock. When it comes to terrorist acts, betrayal and historical scandals, rumors will naturally spread everywhere. Of course, the country will bow to these rumors. The punishment is extremely heavy, the traitors are humiliated in public, and the people applaud. The attitude of the country is firm: since shameful behavior has sent sinners to distant stone mountains, they should stay there and suffer regret and swallowing; However, those unspeakable, dangerous accusations that may anger the whole of Europe need to be carefully hidden in secret meetings that are forbidden to participate. Are these allegations true? No, of course not! There is nothing behind Major Patty's extravagant and crazy fantasy. Everything is just a smoke screen, the purpose is to hide a vulgar and eccentric novel; As long as you have read the formal indictment read in the military court, anyone will believe that the above is true.

How superficial that indictment is! Is it possible for a person to be convicted for this? It is shocking that it is so bad. I ask all honest people to read it: when they think of Dreyfus paying a disproportionate price for it on Devil's Island, their hearts will throb with anger and disgust. Dreyfus can speak many languages, right? This is a crime. I can't find any documents damaging his reputation in his home, can I? This is a crime. He goes home occasionally, doesn't he? This is also a crime. He is diligent and curious, isn't he? This is a crime. He doesn't panic easily, does he? This is a crime. He really panicked, didn't he? This is a crime. How naive its wording is! How groundless its claims are! They told us that he was accused of fourteen different crimes, but in the end there was only one real crime: the famous memorandum. We even found that experts did not agree. One of them, goebert, was under pressure from the military because he dared to come to a conclusion different from what the military expected. They also told us that 23 police officers testified against Dreyfus. We still don't know what questions they were asked, but we are sure that their testimony is not all negative. Besides, you will find that they are all from the War Department. This trial is a family secret meeting, and all of them are "insiders". We can't forget this: it was the General Staff who wanted this trial. They tried Dreyfus, and they just sentenced him for the second time.

In this way, the only thing left is the memorandum, and experts have different views on it. They said that in the conference room, judges naturally tend to be acquitted. If this situation is true, you can understand that today, in order to prove that the judgment is reasonable, the General Staff Department insists that it has documents that can confirm the crime, but it cannot appear. This document legalizes everything, and we must bow to it as if we were obeying an unknown god. I refuse to accept any such documents, I totally refuse! It may be a ridiculous piece of paper, or it may be the document that mentions casual women or asks more and more people to call "D"; There is no doubt that it is a husband or someone who feels that he has not paid the full amount after using his wife. However, isn't that paper related to national defense, and it will immediately lead to war when it is made public? Don't! Don't! That's a lie. What is even more disgusting and ironic is that their lies will not cause them any harm, and there is no way to convict them. They turned France upside down, hiding in the legal noise they made, and blocking people's mouths by making people tremble and distorting their minds. As far as I know, nothing is more dangerous.

Madam President, these facts explain how misjudgment is caused. As for Dreyfus' character, his financial situation, the lack of criminal motive and the incessant shouting of innocence all prove that he is a victim of Major Patty's over-imagination and the prevailing religious teachings of the military. The fanatical pursuit of "dirty Jews" shames our times.

Now, let me talk about the Dongba incident. Three years later, many people's conscience is still deeply disturbed, worried and troubled, which makes them look further, and finally they believe that Dreyfus is innocent.

I won't repeat the story about the initial suspicion and later affirmation of events of Shiller and K; However, when he made an investigation, something very serious happened inside the General Staff. Colonel Sandherr died, and he was replaced by Colonel piccard as the Director of Intelligence. When Picard was on a mission, one day he received a letter from a foreign spy to Colonel Esteban. A strong sense of responsibility drove him to investigate, but he wouldn't take action without the boss's consent. Therefore, he outlined his doubts to his immediate boss-General Gong Si, then General Boide Frey, and then General Bjor, who served as the Secretary of the Army after General messier. The famous Picard file that people often talk about is actually an out-and-out file about ratios. This file was prepared by subordinates for the minister, and the general staff must still have it. The investigation lasted from May to September. 1896. Two things are certain: General Guns is convinced that Estehazi is guilty, while General Boisdeffre and General Bjor do not doubt that Estehazi wrote the memorandum. These conclusions are based on Colonel piccard's investigation. But the mood suddenly rose, because if Estehazi was guilty, Dreyfus's verdict would be overturned, which the General Staff decided to avoid at all costs.

At that time, people involved in the incident must have felt extremely anxious. It is worth noting that General bjork did not make any compromise. He just took office and has the ability to expose the truth. But he didn't dare to do so-there is no doubt that he was afraid of public opinion and all the staff of the General Staff, including General Boide Fleur, General Gong Si and his men. His conscience opposed what he thought was the most important interest of the army, but it only lasted for a minute. A minute later, it was too late. He has made his choice: he gave in.

Since then, his responsibilities have become heavier and heavier. He has already taken on other people's crimes and is as guilty as others. His crime is more serious than others, because he has the right to correct judicial injustice, but he didn't take action. If you can, please understand this! Over the past year, General Bjord, General Boide Fleur and General Gong Si all knew Dreyfus was innocent, but they didn't say a word! Such a person can sleep well at night! They have wives and children, and they love them.

Colonel Picard did his duty as an upright man and showed his firm attitude to his superiors in the name of justice. He even begged them to tell them how unwise their hesitation was, how terrible a storm was forming and how it would break out once the truth came out. Later, Mr. Scheler K repeated these words to General bjork; Out of patriotic enthusiasm, he begged Bjor to deal with this incident seriously, so as not to let it get worse and worse and eventually turn into a public disaster. But the crime has been caused, and ordinary people can't confess; Colonel Picard was moved, and they moved him farther and farther away, even to Tunisia. They even want to assign him a task that will inevitably lead to death. Marquis Mohes was killed in the same area. Nevertheless, Picard did not fall out of favor. General Gong Si keeps friendly correspondence with him, but it is unwise to reveal some secrets.