I owe 50 thousand for parking for two years Is the charge reasonable?

It is certainly unreasonable to owe 50 thousand yuan for parking for two years. Maximum charge per day 10 yuan. If it is two years, it is more than 700 days, more than 7,000 yuan, not tens of thousands.

The latest provisions of parking fees in residential areas:

1. The maximum charge for ground parking service in residential property management area is 70 yuan per vehicle per month. Temporary social vehicles are not charged for the first hour, and those exceeding 1 hour (less than 1 hour is 1 hour) are charged at 2 yuan per hour, and the maximum charge per day (within 24 hours) is 10 yuan.

2. The owners of ordinary residential quarters have property rights or the right to use the garage or parking spaces in the garage, and charge property service fees according to the charging standards of ordinary residential property services.

3 residential and non-residential areas, residential owners in accordance with the residential property service fee standards, non-residential owners in accordance with the market adjusted price.

Regulations on parking management in residential areas

Property Law: Article 30 If a property right is established or destroyed due to factual acts such as legal construction and demolition of houses, it will take effect when the factual act is realized.

Article 39 The owner shall have the right to possess, use, profit from and dispose of his real estate or chattel according to law.

Article 74 In the division of buildings, the planning of parking spaces and garages for parking cars should first meet the needs of owners.

Within the scope of building zoning, the ownership of parking spaces and garages planned for parking cars shall be agreed upon by the parties through buying, selling, possessing or leasing.

Parking spaces that occupy roads or other venues owned by the owner for parking cars shall be owned by the owner.

As long as the calculation result is correct, it is reasonable, but this situation still needs specific analysis.

This kind of thing is far more than one. In Xi 'an, a truck was charged a parking fee of 55,000 yuan for more than two years. The difference is that the Touareg in Hangzhou is worth nearly one million, while the van in Xi is worth less than the parking fee. Hangzhou car owners parked their legally owned vehicles that can run normally in legally established parking spaces, and announced that they had entered into a vehicle storage contract with the parking space management party. The management has the obligation to take care of and protect, and the owner has the obligation to pay the parking fee in full. As long as the parking management party announces the parking fee standard in a prominent position. When the owner is willing to park and actually park, both parties reach an agreement that the owner must pay the parking fee according to the charging standard. Of course, in line with the principle of fair trade, once the vehicle is left unattended for a long time, the parking space management party has the obligation to remind in good faith, that is, to inform the owner that parking for a long time will face the consequences of huge parking fees. Hangzhou, the manager, contacted the owner many times. The owner of the car has parked the car for a long time for his own reasons, resulting in excessive parking fees and should bear the obligation to pay.

This car owner is reasonable. In addition to moving the car to the parking lot, the parking fee of nearly 50,000 yuan already owed has never been refused, but he promised to pay it back. After all, even if he refuses to accept it, there is no law to support his appeal.