Dalian 13-year-old killer boy: hitting on family members and stalking women. Why did he violate the "sense of youth"?

In Dalian, China, a girl aged 10 was killed by a boy aged 13, which once again triggered the controversy about "juvenile delinquency" because it belongs to the category of "juvenile delinquency". At present, according to the official announcement, the murderer is only 13 years old and less than 14 years old, so he has no criminal responsibility and can only be detained for reeducation through labor. However, with the in-depth excavation of the media, the details of this 13-year-old boy before and after the murder gradually surfaced. In addition, acts such as "chatting up family members" and "chasing women" have also caused widespread controversy.

Frankly speaking, according to the law, minors under the age of 14 do not have full criminal responsibility. So this 13-year-old boy can only be regarded as "young and ignorant". But judging from Zhou's behavior and neighbors' comments, this 13-year-old killer boy seems to have become a "little adult". He talked to the girl's parents twice on the day of the murder, and the perpetrator needed great psychological strength to do this.

However, even a boy of 13 years old can be so calm, which is enough to show his psychological age and maturity. At least he knows what he has done. Even after the incident, he was suspected of "directing and acting in the class group with the intention of clarifying the suspect" and emphasized that "I am only 14 years old". This kind of stealing chickens and dogs is surprising. It must be said that its extraordinary psychological quality is enough to crush many "adults."

Of course, with the spread of the story, several women in the same community reported that they were "followed" by the 13-year-old boy who attacked. A woman in her twenties said that she was "followed" three times by a boy of 13 years old. The boy attacked her and once patted her on the shoulder and said, "Aunt, you are so handsome and I am so nervous."

These details are unimaginable when put together. Because, to some extent, this is all a practical joke of adults. So it also gives people a strong sense of disharmony. And this kind of "* * *" with evil behavior once again makes people feel a little angry about the result of legal treatment.

Undoubtedly, the scale of the Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Law has been questioned many times. After all, the law on the protection of minors is designed for girls who are victims 10, not for boys who commit crimes 13. Moreover, how to punish a mature "juvenile delinquent" is a subject worthy of in-depth thinking and questioning.

For "juvenile delinquents", it is a problem that needs careful consideration whether to take "age" as the boundary or "cognitive level" as the boundary when defining criminal responsibility ability. Even for a child with criminal experience, do they have a future, how to tolerate as a stranger, and how to let him (her) live a normal life. These all need one answer after another and a responsibility to the big society.

In a sense, in early childhood, with the growth of age, children's cognitive ability does change. But as children grow up, their consciousness becomes crazy. Moreover, in the last decade, ordinary children have grown up earlier than in the past. On the one hand, the growth of the body is accelerating, on the other hand, the richness of the media has led to a surge in cognition. So the phenomenon of "little adults" is becoming more and more common.

For children who have experienced crimes, this is actually a lifelong scar. From the perspective of redemption and assistance, society should be compassionate. However, this does not necessarily mean that all "juvenile offenders" can start their lives again. Therefore, if the rescue and rescue are unsuccessful, it is likely to have a second attack on the larger society. The trigger of this possibility must also be taken seriously.

It is necessary to admit that "childhood is passing away" and "youth is also passing away". Because when the mass media is widely used, it represents the scale of age division, which is not so accurate. Therefore, when a boy aged 13 begins to show "killing calmly" and "flirting", it means that 13 is only an indicator of physiological age, but from the perspective of psychological age, it seems to have lost its effectiveness.

Just like Neil? Neil Neil Postman said: "It is painful, embarrassing and especially sad to see children's innocence, plasticity and curiosity eroded and distorted into inferior qualities of pseudo-adults." Yes, we have moved towards a new division of life: one end is infancy, the other end is old age, and the middle is what we might call "adult childhood".

Therefore, the identification of "juvenile offenders" needs to be more cautious. Because dealing with malignant cases is not only related to the feelings of the victims, but also,

Therefore, for the relative person who violates the "youth consciousness", if he is "immortal" or "exempt from punishment", it means that there are "loopholes" in jurisprudence to some extent. For the offender, his or her evil may have been brewing. Even though there may be external incentives, the evil of human nature itself is rooted in bone marrow.

The sympathy of the big society must be to protect the victims, but it is best to be strict with the perpetrators. Being tolerant enough to criminals, we are sowing the seeds of trouble for the future of a great society. Besides, we don't know whether a murderer can overcome his evil thoughts and return to the right path in three to five years.

Therefore, it is really a long way to go to manage "juvenile offenders". Even if the future of criminals really changes, it may not be fully accepted by the "big society". Because, no matter who, don't want to contact with a "murderer". Even if the "fault" has passed, the "hidden danger" is still worrying.

Because, a person's life is only once, and he can't stand injury and toss. The death of this 10-year-old girl means a long period of depression for her family. Similarly, a 13-year-old boy commits a crime, which means that his family will be depressed for a long time. And there will be more moral condemnation. Especially in the moral atmosphere of "the son doesn't teach, the father has the responsibility", this is almost a fatal blow.

Moreover, from some media reports, it is emphasized that "the parents of the boys who beat him did not apologize." From the perspective of public order and good customs, we should "apologize" and at least give psychological comfort to the families of the victims. However, judging from the specific circumstances of the case, "whether to apologize" is not the most important. The most important thing is to deal with the aftermath and punish the victims.

Of course, with the exposure of details such as "intrigue" and "stalking women", public opinion will be more inclined to severely punish "boys and girls". Because his violation of the "sense of youth" has always been directed at his head, and because he 13 years old, why should he be generous? Naturally, people feel a little angry. Perhaps the fact itself is like this, which is more worth thinking about.