Does it violate privacy for parents to peek at their children's QQ chat records and text messages?

Does it violate privacy for parents to peek at their children's QQ chat records and text messages? This is an invasion of privacy.

According to the laws of our country, the following acts are violations of privacy:

1. Make public the name, portrait, address and telephone number of citizens without their consent.

2, illegal intrusion, search other people's homes, or otherwise disrupt the peace of others.

3. Illegally stalking others, monitoring others' residences, installing eavesdropping equipment, secretly photographing others' private lives, and spying on others' indoor conditions.

4. Illegally spying on others' property status or publishing their property status without others' permission.

5. Privately open other people's letters, peek at other people's diaries, spy on other people's private documents and make them public.

6. Investigate and spy on other people's social relations to make them illegal.

7, interfere with other couples' sexual life or investigation.

8. Publicize other people's extramarital sex life to the public.

9, the disclosure of personal materials of citizens or open or expand the scope of disclosure.

10, collecting pure personal information that citizens are unwilling to disclose to the society.

However, the most controversial issue now is how to judge the right of guardianship (the right of guardians to protect the person and property of persons declared incapacitated or with limited capacity) when privacy is involved.

Privacy is a complete claim, which embodies the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of minors by the state and society. Guardianship is an obligation to a great extent. Chapter II ***6 of the Law on the Protection of Minors stipulates almost all the "obligations" of parents and their guardians, but none of them stipulates their "rights". Among them, Article 12 also stipulates responsibilities: "Parents or other guardians who fail to perform guardianship duties or infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of minors under guardianship shall bear responsibilities according to law." Therefore, parents can't use their "obligations" to limit and infringe on their children's privacy.

Parents who violate their children's privacy in the name of love have actually turned their due guardianship into improper or even illegal surveillance. Even if it is conducive to the healthy growth of children, respecting children's privacy and giving them their own work and thinking space is the key to protecting children's dignity, caring for and cultivating children's healthy personality and independent spirit.

Moreover, guardianship is not surveillance, and schools and parents should not take care of children's spiritual growth, let alone openly invade children's privacy in the name of love. In the face of personality and dignity, there is no age difference, even the youngest child has dignity, and whether this dignity can be properly protected is the key to his healthy spiritual or physical and mental growth! Therefore, invading children's privacy in the name of love is doomed to be a kind of "confused love" that must be abandoned.