There are great risks in leapfrog reporting. How to resolve the risk of leapfrog reporting?

The work of asking for instructions and reporting belongs to "abnormal work orders". Speaking of work orders, in fact, many units and companies have relevant regulations. For example, in order to ensure that everyone from managers to ordinary employees can work according to the prescribed procedures, ask for instructions and report according to the prescribed procedures, and avoid confusion of responsibilities and overlapping of processes, many units and companies have special hierarchical management methods or the scope and process of asking for reports. If someone doesn't abide by this regulation and adopts the practice of asking for instructions and reporting work, it will inevitably break the fixed work order. Moreover, because many things in work are related, a person's behavior of asking for instructions and reporting work often causes many things to be disrupted, so this behavior should be avoided or even eliminated as much as possible.

Asking for instructions and reporting work is an "abnormal working state". We can make this assumption. For example, if you are the deputy leader of the company, the department leader in charge of you should have asked for instructions and reported to you, but he bypassed you and went directly to the main leader to ask for instructions and report. What would you think? On the one hand, as the deputy leader in charge and the main leader, you can only be the executor of any decision made after listening to the report, and you will be very passive; On the other hand, this practice of department heads obviously disrupts the overall work order, because if everyone in the company does this, wouldn't it be a mess? Or is it not that there is no discipline, no discipline, so what are we talking about?

In the workplace, leapfrog is a taboo in the workplace. First of all, your assessment is arranged by your direct leader. If you report over the top, your direct leader will be embarrassed. Secondly, the object of your report will not have a good impression on you. Many people think that the big leader will like the following people to report over their heads. Actually, this is a wrong concept. Hierarchical responsibility is the basis for this system to remain stable in each unit. Therefore, unless authorized by the direct leader, or directly requested by the superior, don't go beyond reporting. Even if the superior asks you to go beyond your direct leader, you should say hello to your direct leader first. Generally speaking, leapfrog reports are only used in emergencies. For example, your direct leader can't contact you suddenly, and this matter is urgent, so you can report it over the top. But make it clear afterwards. You'd better send a short message to your direct leader after the report.

In fact, this problem is quite common in the daily workplace. The pros and cons of leapfrog are really difficult to deal with. First of all, the advantages are: under special circumstances, such as the sales industry, the superior is absent, the phone is disconnected, and the customer is in a hurry. In the case of exceeding his authority, he must ensure the interests of the company and sign the customer's order. With the order, the company has its own performance. Disadvantages are: often, the leader will think that you don't respect him and take him seriously. Secondly, you should go first without the consent of the leader. If something goes wrong, you have to bear it yourself, which may be more serious. So I personally suggest that you should be familiar with the whole process model of the company. If you want to do this often, you need to make careful judgments based on your own experience, handle both sides well and make them smooth.