A 7-year-old man in Shanghai died suddenly in the bathroom. Why was his family's claim rejected?

Because the court held that the owner of the public bathroom had rescued the elderly, and he also called 12 at the first time to send the elderly to the hospital for treatment. Moreover, the owner of the public bathroom also posted warning signs in the process of running the bathroom. Therefore, in this case, the security obligation has been fulfilled. Therefore, on the whole, the court will reject the family's claim.

After encountering disputes in life, anyone usually chooses to bring a lawsuit to the court to safeguard their own rights and interests. After all, the court can have a fair and just attitude in the process of hearing any case. Moreover, the responsibility between the plaintiff and the defendant will be divided according to the relevant evidence, so it has become a relatively common phenomenon to choose to solve the contradiction through litigation in the court.

a 7-year-old man suddenly died after taking a bath in the public bathroom.

A 75-year-old man in Shanghai suddenly fainted while taking a bath in the public bathroom. However, he died after being rescued. Thus, in this case, the family members of the elderly and the owner of the public bathroom had a dispute. And the family of the old man also filed a lawsuit in court, and asked the owner of the public bathroom to compensate 5, yuan for all kinds of losses.

the reason why the court rejected the family's claim.

Secondly, when hearing this case, the court has clearly rejected the amount claimed by the family members. Because the court held that after the 75-year-old man fell in the public bathroom, the boss also rescued him and called 12 at the first time. However, in the process of operating the public bathroom, some relevant warning slogans were also posted. Therefore, in this case, it also plays the obligation of security.

my personal opinion on this matter.

finally, I personally think that the sudden death of a 75-year-old man in this case will have an unacceptable feeling for the family members of the old man. However, in this case, the family members of the 75-year-old man should also maintain a more rational attitude to deal with the aftermath of the old man. But also should abide by the court's judgment, after all, the court will have a fair and just state in the process of judging any dispute.