Is it really good that the Ministry of Education forbids gifted students and poor students to study in the same class after placement?

Expect your son to succeed and your daughter to succeed? It is the greatest wish of every parent, so parents want to send their children to the fast class of the school, because the fast class is full of top students of this school, so-called top students, and the learning atmosphere is relatively good.

However, in June last year 165438+ 10, the Ministry of Education proposed to ban placement examinations, implement balanced placement, and explicitly prohibit placement of primary and secondary schools? Fast and slow class? It is forbidden to divide classes in order to realize the fairness of educational resources. Now, one year has passed, has the school really implemented the notice of the Ministry of Education? What happens when top students and poor students are tied to the same class?

Did the school really carry out the notice of the Ministry of Education?

There is a saying:? There are policies and countermeasures? Although the Ministry of Education has banned schools from taking placement exams and divided them into fast classes and slow classes. But do primary and secondary schools in some areas still do this? Sneaking around? Share it privately? Fast and slow class? , but some areas have been cancelled? Fast and slow class? All the students in his class are the best in their grade.

Is it really good for students to tie the top students and the bottom students in the same class?

Parents' views

Several families are happy and several are sad.

For this notice, there are parents' support and parents' opposition.

Parents who support it believe that the placement of classes really reflects the teaching of students in accordance with their aptitude. After all, the level of children is different. Putting gifted students and poor students in the same class can easily lead to poor students? Eat? No, eugenics? Eat? There is no satiety. Even some children who study well have poor self-control, so they are easily taken away by the class? Little punk? Bring bad things.

Parents who object think:? Teaching in different classes has a great influence on poor students, and it is easy for children to lose their interest and enthusiasm in learning. Moreover, in the compulsory education stage, pay attention to the healthy development of children's body and mind.

So what do parents want? Fast and slow class? Still don't want to share? Fast and slow class? And then what? Huazhong Normal University once conducted an attitude survey on this issue. Among them, 63.8% parents support the teaching in different classes, especially the parents of students with good grades want their children to study in key classes in key schools.

Teacher's opinion

Not conducive to teaching

Parallel classes are not conducive to teachers' classroom teaching, because students' level is uneven and inconsistent, and teachers will pay attention to one thing and ignore another in the teaching process.

The most obvious performance is that when explaining the same knowledge point, good students can understand it once, middle students can understand it once or twice, but for poor students, you may have to explain it five or six times or even ten times, but you may not understand it. This has caused an embarrassing phenomenon: top students don't have enough to eat, and poor students can't eat. So many teachers think it is necessary to teach in different classes.

Student's point of view

As what? Clients? What do the students think of this matter? Do they also support class separation?

Some students said:? The education law stipulates that classes cannot be divided. However, the reality will still be divided into good classes and bad classes. Students in good classes are under great competitive pressure, while students in poor classes are passive and slack, and have no motivation. In addition, educational resources are not equitably distributed. There are good and bad, which makes it more difficult for students with poor grades to improve their grades and easily lose confidence. It is unfair to reduce learning enthusiasm, and it is easy to form polarization. If you don't have to divide classes, you can neutralize polarization. ?

Some students also said:? Teaching should be divided into classes, so that good students can become better and good students will not be influenced by poor students. ?

Write it at the end

Should I share it? Fast and slow class? The mountain village thinks there are advantages and disadvantages. For students who study well, fast classes can help them form a good learning atmosphere and sense of competition, thus promoting them to become more and more excellent. For poor students, it has little influence on them. People who really want to learn, even if the learning environment is worse, will make themselves excellent. In short, the advantages of teaching in different classes outweigh the disadvantages!

Do you agree with classroom teaching? Welcome to leave a message.

(The pictures are all from the Internet. If there is any infringement, please inform us to delete it. )

More exciting content, so stay tuned? Does the mountain village teacher see education?