# # The earliest witness of the Chaozhou Tesla accident voiced.

165438+ 10 13, the incident of "two deaths and three injuries caused by a Tesla out of control in Chaozhou, Guangdong Province" was fermented on the internet, and multiple accident videos were exposed one after another. According to the previous report of Auto Industry Concern, the incident occurred at 6: 42 am on June 5, 165438. A Y-car ready to pull over suddenly swerved and slowly accelerated. At first, the Y-car once avoided pedestrians and vehicles on the road, but with the rapid increase of vehicle speed, the driver lost control of the Y-car and hit four people, eventually causing two deaths and three injuries, including a senior three student. On the same day, Mr. Zhan, the driver of the accident vehicle, was interviewed by the media and revealed the detailed process of the accident that day. Of course, for Tesla, publishing the survey results as soon as possible is responsible for the brand and the users. If the vehicle does have potential safety hazards, relevant measures should be announced and taken to avoid the same tragedy.

Let's take a look at what happened when the earliest witness in the Tesla accident in Chaozhou made a sound.

Tesla and the driver hold their own words, and the real victim doesn't even have a chance to speak!

Chaozhou Tesla accident is still fermenting. At present, both the owner and Tesla hold their own words. As far as online discussion is concerned, most people are also concerned about whether the owner stepped on the brakes and whether Tesla is out of control. Many professionals have given professional technical analysis to infer who is responsible for the accident. ...

However, the Rashomon behind the Tesla safety accident is not once or twice. In recent years, similar security incidents are numerous. But should we pay more attention to the casualties, public facilities damage and social security threats caused by Tesla safety accidents?

It is reported that the Tesla accident in Chaozhou caused two passers-by to die and three people were seriously injured! Every victim is involved in a family. As you can imagine, the damage caused by the dead in this accident to his family is even more devastating and irreparable.

For example, one of the deceased was a senior three student in Raoping No.4 Middle School, and he was in the best period of his life. President Raoping No.4 Middle School said that the students who died unfortunately achieved good results in liberal arts, and hoped that the traffic police would investigate the truth of the accident as soon as possible and comfort the students' families and classmates. Shortly after the accident, the school leaders have organized teachers to comfort the students' families, hoping to minimize the pain of their families.

But I want to ask, a good daughter of a parent, a good student of a teacher, a good friend of a classmate and a pillar of the future of the motherland, who can bear such pain to realize the value of life and see the scenery of life? Tesla or the driver? !

The answer is no! They just want to win the argument and have no time to talk to him.

But there is more than one such tragedy! In this accident, two people died on the spot! Three people were seriously injured! Who will wash away the grievances of the deceased! Can the rest of the injured be safe and smooth!

Therefore, when Tesla imposed the responsibility on the perpetrators, when the driver tried to deny the responsibility, when online public opinion stood on two sides. ......

Can there be a trace of human care to care for the people who were directly injured in this accident and their relatives around them? Even the public facilities and accident witnesses damaged by the accident, who will erase the shadow from their hearts?

The answer is still no, everyone is waiting for the answer, waiting for the wrong party to take responsibility. But 5 1 jun thinks that these right and wrong are meaningless in front of life. Because they all have unshirkable responsibilities.

165438+1October 14 The family members of the drivers involved in the Chaozhou Tesla accident responded to the accident by video, explaining the accident process and preliminary handling. It was mentioned in the interview that at present, the family members of the accident paid a compulsory insurance of18,000 yuan, and the commercial insurance claims need to be confirmed before they can be settled.

165438+1October16th, the family members of Chaozhou Tesla owners said that they had not got the driving data of the accident vehicle so far. If the traffic police and the third-party agencies can't produce the data before testing, they won't recognize the appraisal results of the third-party testing agencies.

According to the current anxiety of both the owner and Tesla, it is not difficult to see that the results of the incident investigation will have to wait for a long time. Then when the victim can get compensation, it will be even further away.

Pathetic! Alas! Anger! Damn it.

Thus, 5 1 Jun remembered a Tesla accident in the past. Tesla won the case, of course, but Rashomon, which ended without results, is too numerous to mention.

Last year, the "Shanghai Tesla female car owners' roof rights protection" incident was a sensation. Up to now, no official results have been announced in this rights protection case. There are still female car owners' demands on the internet, hoping that Tesla can provide the original data of their car accidents. At present, the accident car of the female car owner has been parked in front of the Tesla store for more than a year, and now it has been put on the car clothes.

Tesla Roof Rights Protection Weibo Screenshot

There is also the "Tesla in Jimmy Lin" incident, in which the driver Jimmy Lin almost died in a car accident and was rescued by a kind person. Later, after treatment, the body basically recovered. But how did the cause of the traffic accident happen? Remains a mystery.

Some people may think that the contradiction between car companies and individuals is a tug of war. But I wonder if you have noticed that with more and more disputes between Tesla and car owners, attacking Tesla or car owners has gradually become the focus of the whole society.

5 1 Jun learned that due to frequent accidents such as fire and brake failure of new energy vehicles, signs prohibiting Tesla vehicles from entering have been posted in some communities.

In addition, some domestic institutions, hospitals and other places also prohibit Tesla cars from entering. The specific reason is that Tesla's body is equipped with a large number of cameras, which will monitor or sneak shots of the surrounding scenes at any time, posing privacy and security risks.

There are endless comments on the Internet about "boycotting", "seeing Tesla hiding" and "I am afraid that its brakes will fail".

Yes, that's right. Who knows the danger and risks alone? The ridicule of Tesla on the Internet is actually a manifestation of public anxiety. You know, in 202 1 year, the cumulative delivery volume of Tesla in China market was about 32 1 10,000 vehicles! In the past 10 month, the sales volume reached 7 1 0,704 vehicles!

Such a large possession means that Tesla has buried hundreds of thousands of "mobile bombs" in China in disguise! Can Tesla really stay out of this potential public safety threat?

In fact, it can be seen from many cases of "brake failure" that some car owners are not particularly familiar with Tesla's control and single pedal mode, which will lead to frequent accidents. And does Tesla have the obligation to clearly inform the owner during the delivery of the vehicle?

For example, Xpeng Motors also has advanced driver assistance systems such as NGP city navigation, but drivers must watch video learning for the first time on Xpeng Motors official APP and complete the exam before opening this function. Strengthen users' cognition of this function and ability, and master the usage mode.

In the field of new energy vehicles, Tesla's leading position in driving technology has been recognized by most people, but whether its technology has been widely popularized is another phenomenon. Is Tesla dereliction of duty in this process? How to solve the problem of potential safety hazards?

In fact, the potential danger brought by smart cars has actually happened. It is not the possibility of the future discussed by sociologists, but it has actually affected our lives, even our lives. As a producer of products, automobile brands have unlimited obligations to the safety of products and the safety of use.

In this regard, 5 1 Jun hopes to tell Tesla that advanced technology is like a scourge. If this beast can't be tamed, please cage it! Give an accident statement as soon as possible, give victims and users a safety and eliminate this unsafe factor as soon as possible!

I wonder what readers think of Tesla's frequent safety accidents? Meanwhile, can readers who have studied sociology tell us how to treat Tesla bomb correctly?

More inside information! Driver's voice in Chaozhou Tesla accident

165438+ 10 13, the incident of "two deaths and three injuries caused by a Tesla out of control in Chaozhou, Guangdong Province" was fermented on the internet, and multiple accident videos were exposed one after another. According to the previous report of Auto Industry Concern, the incident occurred at 6: 42 am on June 5, 165438. A Y-car ready to pull over suddenly swerved and slowly accelerated. At first, the Y-car once avoided pedestrians and vehicles on the road, but with the rapid increase of vehicle speed, the driver lost control of the Y-car and hit four people, eventually causing two deaths and three injuries, including a senior three student.

In response to the accident, Tesla officials responded in an interview with Red Star News: the background data showed that (1) the vehicle switch was deeply pressed for a long time and was once maintained at100%; (2) There is no action of stepping on the brakes in the whole process; (3) During driving, the driver briefly presses the P button four times and then releases it quickly. At the same time, the brake lights turn on and off quickly.

On the same day, Mr. Zhan, the driver of the accident vehicle, was interviewed by the media and revealed the detailed process of the accident that day. According to his description, I drove to the store as usual that day. When I got to the store, I released my foot and put it on the brake pedal. Under normal circumstances, Tesla will stop by itself when it has kinetic energy recovery, but that day is different. After stepping on the brake, I found that the brake pedal was hard, so I stepped on it twice, but it still didn't work. At that time, the traffic was still slow, so I pressed P gear. At this time, the vehicle began to accelerate and rushed out, instinctively avoiding the approaching electric motorcycle.

Then the car got out of control, so I wanted to find an obstacle to stop the car. At this point, the speed has soared to more than 100km. At that time, I could only concentrate on driving and avoid pedestrians and vehicles on the road. At that time, the steering wheel was still working. Mr. Zhan said that he was still awake and didn't think about what would happen to him. He just wants not to involve too many innocent people. Finally, he reached the side of the road where the car crashed. After hitting a tricycle, he didn't know anything. People are already in a coma. Mr. Zhan insisted that the vehicle was out of control, and he didn't drink on the day of the accident and the day before. His feet were always on the brake disc and he didn't step on the accelerator.

On-site surveillance video shows that the front of the Y-shaped car is seriously deformed, and the original appearance can hardly be seen. When the left and right doors are opened, you can see the blue airbag in the cockpit. It is understood that the accident caused 2 deaths and 3 injuries, including a senior three student who went to school by bike. Shortly after the accident, many teachers from the school rushed to the scene to help. The headmaster said that the students who died unfortunately achieved good results in liberal arts, and hoped that the traffic police would investigate the truth of the accident as soon as possible and comfort the students' families and classmates.

At present, for both sides of the accident, the accident owner firmly believes that "brake failure" is the main cause of the tragedy, while Tesla said that the driver did not always step on the brakes.

In fact, there are only two reasons for the accident, either the product has a problem or the owner's operation error. Of course, before more information or official data are reported, it is impossible to determine whether this is a vehicle failure or an operational error. Obviously, there will be no breakthrough in the accident in a short time. However, EDR data is an important breakthrough in investigating the cause of the accident. EDR can record the key data of vehicle operation before, during and after the collision, such as vehicle speed, vehicle collision acceleration, driver assistance system and driver's reaction at the time of the accident. However, given that Tesla has mastered the key data and clearly stated that "the driver did not step on the brakes all the way", it is difficult for the authoritative department to make an appraisal.

"Automotive Industry Concern" believes that in order to better protect their rights and interests, it is best to install a driving recorder or a black box for their cars. In the event of a traffic accident, we can determine who is responsible by looking at the situation at that time. Before the official results are announced, we don't have to speculate and judge what is right and wrong, and the truth will naturally come out. Of course, for Tesla, publishing the survey results as soon as possible is responsible for the brand and the users. If the vehicle does have potential safety hazards, relevant measures should be announced and taken to avoid the same tragedy.

Share valuable car news every day.

Autobots' platform