What is an inclusive city? And the importance of inclusive cities.

The so-called inclusiveness means that foreigners can not only meet the economic and material conditions, but also quickly integrate into the local culture, into the local life circle, settle down and get a deep sense of satisfaction. An inclusive survey includes seven questions: communication, employment, going to school, being a neighbor, and children getting married. Urban inclusiveness is the tolerance of local people to foreigners. The news that Beijing is the second lowest tolerance attracts attention, but "inclusiveness" is originally the "satisfaction" that foreigners can obtain economic materials and integrate into local culture. Since it is a "feeling", it is inevitable that people will have different views. However, as a city manager, it is unreasonable to just accuse the citizens of "blind obedience", and it is the most important thing to reflect on policies. Tolerance is the fundamental orientation of urban interpersonal environment. But unfortunately, many of our cities are not as good as they say. In recent years, with the frequent population movement and the influx of a large number of rural people into cities, many cities have only found a "shelter" for outsiders from an individual perspective, but there are far from policies that can generate internalized motivation to make outsiders really feel "home"-behind the slogan "So-and-so welcomes you", some policies are available. For example, policies such as "temporary residence permit" divide urban residents into "us" and "them", making outsiders feel excluded "lonely"; For example, urban management always puts public security and stability in the first place, "strictly preventing outsiders from entering", but fails to have a good service policy in terms of employment tolerance and rights protection, and even once there was an embarrassing topic of discussing the setting of "exclusion threshold". For example, in terms of fair development, on the one hand, foreign-funded enterprises are given "super-national" treatment, on the other hand, at the expense of the so-called "comparative advantage of labor force", the working treatment of the bottom people is not improved, and the welfare enjoyed by urban people has a high threshold for "outsiders" ... Some people say that the cultural superiority of urban people is the fundamental reason for the low tolerance of cities. However, the author thinks that, compared with cultural tolerance, these low-level policy things are the key to the low tolerance in the initial urbanization process of China. In the era of a large number of migrant workers entering the city and a large number of people flowing, without the most basic "equality" policy of urban management, the dual urban-rural difference will move to the city, forming a two-sided contradiction between "charming" and "bad" in a city, and eventually becoming the "bottleneck" of urban development. Only by consciously correcting these concepts can we win more "inclusive space". At this point, the inclusiveness of the city is a "feeling" for ordinary people, but it is far from a "feeling" for city managers.