How to evaluate Luo Zhenyu's performance in "On Chipa"?

I remember that in one issue, Ma Dong said something to the effect: "I am very different from Teacher Luo. Teacher Luo always ends with a period or an exclamation point, and I only dare to use a question mark. " After listening to this, I suddenly understood what I hate about Luo Zhenyu. In their speeches, Xu Dong and Cai Kangyong usually hold the attitude of expressing their opinions and discussing together. In doing so, they are in line with the spiritual core of the theory of Qi Yuan. This program is made to let everyone listen to different voices and accept all kinds of things different from themselves with suspicion. Even if you are a little self-righteous, you dare not teach everyone to be a person directly. The premise is that these three people have considerable experience and capital. And Luo Zhenyu's favorite thing to do is to teach people to do things. Still use the tone of no doubt. Personally, I hate being told what to do from God's point of view and adding exclamation points to enhance the effect.

. Especially when Luo Zhenyu himself is not very qualified. When his own knowledge level and spiritual level are not qualified to be a mentor of others, I really resent it, but he always tells something in a positive way as a mentor.

I don't like Luo Zhenyu, from the way he talks to the content. As what Chipa said, I also know something about these mentors. Ma Dong, witty and witty, is good at answering words and is also very wise in resolving embarrassment. He can be very touching when he is serious. Cai Kangyong, the clouds are light and the wind is light, which hit the nail on the head. It is warm as spring breeze, gentle and kind when it is vicious. Short and tight is another style, I don't want to talk about it. He has an unbearable hot straight man, a clear love and hate, and a childlike innocence. What these three people have in common is that they are really learned, have a high spiritual level, choose words and make sentences, and most importantly, have feelings and innocence. Luo Zhenyu, on the other hand, always gives the impression of a false intellectual. The books he reads and quotes are all aimed at selling his own ideas for profit. As for the true meaning of the book, he doesn't care. He is a philistine and a low-level person, but he still has to preach and teach under the veil of knowledge. Where do you get the confidence to instill your undigested ideas into others?