What do you think about the train station prompt “Don’t trust anyone”?

The train station reminds you not to trust anyone. This idea is understandable, because there are many scammers now, and it is not ruled out that there are good people. However, it reminds you not to believe in any forbearance. It serves as a warning and does not say that you must abide by it. If you decide for yourself that this person can be trusted, that is your choice. The train station has no right to interfere with our private choices.

Of course this is partly related to the safety concept of the train station. The highest principle of software and hardware within a railway station is "fault-oriented safety". What does it mean? This means that when system software or hardware fails, the area responsible for the software or hardware will be in a safe state.

Under the influence of this safety concept, it is understandable to put forward the slogan not to trust anyone, and try to ask the staff for help, so that at least there is a certain guarantee. This kind of security concept of preferring to kill the wrong person rather than letting it go is something I personally think is worthy of admiration.

After all, there are endless tricks of scammers nowadays, and countless people have proven all this with blood and tears. Therefore, precautions are indispensable. Maybe some people feel that there is a loss of trust. So I would like to ask if many pyramid schemes and scammers take advantage of the trust between people. I think trust between people is built on mutual understanding, not blind trust.

This question reminds me of a farce. A lawyer was asked to go through security check when entering the subway station. Yes, security check, and then asked for liquid test. Of course, children will also have to go through security check. Then they actually joined forces with several lawyers to sue the subway company.

When I saw this news, I couldn’t help but laugh. This security check measure is obviously a measure to ensure the safety of people when traveling. Que was accused because the lawyer couldn't stand it.

I was thinking that you know the law. You won the lawsuit against the company. OK, if you cancel the security check, then the terrorist attacks on the subway will cause human losses and property losses. How to calculate this account? Will you be affected a little bit by this? You want to sue the subway company again for having no safety measures.

Furthermore, what’s wrong with what he said about even children being subject to security checks? It's a good thing that children don't have to go through security checks, right? Then terrorists will bring tools in, so it's not a good thing to let children carry dangerous items in order to avoid security checks. I really don’t know what these so-called top students are studying. Aren’t they all linked to reality? Can the public order and safety of the entire society be left behind just because an individual has received some grievances?

So some of the current safety slogans and measures in public facilities still make sense. You may not believe it, but please do not put your own ideas above the safety of others. This opinion represents only my own.