Joke Collection Website - News headlines - Rules for answering questions in the first-class constructor exam-paper requirements

Rules for answering questions in the first-class constructor exam-paper requirements

What are the answering rules for the first-class constructor exam? In the exam, if the test paper is neat, it will leave a good impression. In this paper, the construction education network will share the answering rules of the first-level constructor exam-the requirements of the paper, hoping to help candidates get good grades.

The remaining time for test preparation is less than 20 days. Seize the opportunity.

Try to keep the surface clean, and pay attention to the following points:

1, not marked.

Remember not to make marks and words irrelevant to the topic on the test paper, such as triangle and circle symbols. For this kind of marked paper, it may be regarded as zero when judging the paper.

2, neat handwriting

Subjective questions need to be graded by the marking teacher, so the cleanliness of the test paper will directly affect the score.

Neat handwriting is also convenient for marking teachers to find scoring points in the answers. Scribbled handwriting will not be deducted directly. If you can't see clearly what you wrote in the whole answer, it should be impossible to get high marks. The exam is not to let others appreciate your handwriting. You must make others understand what you have written, so that you can get marks.

3. The answer should be "seated"

All test papers must be entered into the computer before marking, and each teacher is only responsible for grading one of the questions, and the other questions are invisible. Therefore, everyone must read carefully when answering questions, so that the answers are "seated" and written in the corresponding positions, otherwise the marking teacher will not see them, even if they are correct, it is futile.

Avoid "which page to turn to" marked by some friends. Remember that the answer must be written in the prescribed answer area.

Don't miss this question.

Omission refers to a small problem that is easily overlooked by everyone. For example, if a case asks "Is it correct and explain the reasons", it should be answered in two steps: first, whether the answer is correct, and then state the reasons in different articles. Never tell the reason directly and ignore the judgment. It's a pity to lose points.