A 7-year-old boy whose clothes were involved in the elevator died. Who will be responsible for his death?

With the development of science and technology and the application of various electrified equipment, life is becoming more and more convenient now. However, it is the application of all kinds of electrified equipment that is more dangerous for children without capacity for behavior. Therefore, as guardians of children, we should pay more attention to the safety of children and avoid tragedies. In fact, as long as there is a safety accident in public places, as an injured person, he will always find various reasons for some units to take responsibility and then propose high-priced compensation, but few parties have thought about their responsibilities. In short, it is very common for the parties to compensate for some losses when someone dies here. The man's clothes were involved in the elevator and eventually died of lack of oxygen. Who should be responsible?

First of all, the parents who bear the greatest responsibility for this are the parents who have not fulfilled their obligations as guardians. If you want to find a "murderer", it belongs to your parents. On the one hand, for a 7-year-old boy, his parents know very well how much he can do. As long as he has a little sense of security, he will not allow his children to go out to the supermarket to buy things by themselves, because in this process, it is easy to have some unpredictable situations and even the children get lost. So no matter what the reason, the child's parents should accompany him.

On the other hand, the personal behavior of a 7-year-old boy is unpredictable. No matter on the way to the supermarket or in the supermarket, accidents may happen. Suddenly rushing into the road on the road or hiding in a corner of the supermarket will cause very bad accidents. In this case, parents, as guardians, should take good care of their children and avoid causing losses to others and themselves.

Secondly, for supermarkets, it can only be an accident, and losing money is also a grievance. Because there is no one on duty next to the elevator, it is difficult to claim compensation. On the one hand, there are obvious signs on the elevator, which is why if the child is not suitable to take the elevator, the guardian will guide the child to refuse to take the elevator. On the other hand, the elevator is only a public service facility, and the supermarket has no obligation to equip the elevator with personnel on duty, because customers do not need to pay extra in the process of taking the elevator. In this way,

At the same time, if there is no person on duty in the elevator to claim compensation, it is even more important to claim compensation from the elevator manufacturer. After all, something will get stuck during the elevator operation. In this case, the elevator manufacturer did not set the corresponding emergency avoidance function on the product, which in itself shows that there are defects in the design of the product, and the elevator itself cannot stop running in time because things are stuck.

Finally, no matter what the final result of this matter is, as parents of children, they all have unshirkable responsibilities. As a child's guardian, we should not do our duty as a guardian, but let the society pay for the child's life. After the child's accident, you exaggerated your sadness and forced the supermarket to submit. This is evil in itself. Therefore, for parents, children nowadays are very fragile. In the city, adults will have all kinds of accidents, not to mention children with no capacity for behavior. Only by setting an example, watching over your children and doing your duty as a guardian can you live a happy life.