Why is it said that Japanese products exported to China are second-rate? Is that true? Is there any evidence or something?

Of course, the fact is not that serious.

Take some household appliances as an example.

When Japanese manufacturers produced them, they knew which country they were supplied to.

That is to say, orders were placed before production.

If Japan sells some inferior household appliances from their country to China, it is obviously a little left.

Because Japanese household appliances are sold to China at 11 volts, we can't use them. < p I don't agree with the statement

, but I do feel that there are obvious quality differences between the products exported from Japan to China and those from Japan and even other countries

Take the Mitsubishi off-road vehicle made in Japan as an example

A friend photographed an off-road vehicle donated by the Japanese government at a government official car auction

After the test drive, it is obvious that this original vehicle, which has traveled more than 1, kilometers, has been exposed to us in performance

. For example, cosmetics

brought back from Japan and bought in China marked with original imports will also be different

I don't know whether it is because of different quality standards in each country or what

--------------------------------------------. He once told us not to use Procter & Gamble's products, because Procter & Gamble invested too little in raw materials, always used the cheapest raw materials, and then made them look close to the quality of products of the same grade through technical means, so that they couldn't bear to be the OEM of Procter & Gamble in the end. I have used Head & Shoulders brought back from Britain and Australia by my friends, and I feel that the effect is really different from that in China. When I saw the "SK-II" incident, I saw Procter & Gamble's indifference. Listed companies are most concerned about profits and shareholders' interests, especially when there is a legal loophole to exploit. I hope you will give full support to this incident, show solidarity to the victims, and let these foreign companies understand that consumers in China have their own right to choose. When the labor cost and advertising cost are lower than those of foreign countries, the income is not as good as that of China people in developed countries, but they have to spend the same price as foreign countries to buy products with inferior quality. This money is a bit too dark!

On the other hand, foreign advertisements for drugs, food and cosmetics, which are related to health safety, should list the detailed information of the products and even the molecular formula, while in China, not only the relevant safety test reports are not listed, but also false advertisements are everywhere.

foreign brands have almost completely occupied the domestic market, and well-known domestic brands are constantly acquired by foreign brands and die out. Heartache! ! !

with SKII gone, there will be SXII, SYII coming. We should not only boycott skii, but also boycott all P&G products. Until you enjoy the rights that consumers should have.

The employees of Procter & Gamble Company wrote a blog on the Internet saying that "this is really a war". I tell you now that this is a war. You fight for your master (it is reasonable to be loyal to others), but for us consumers, the real battle has just begun.

Procter & Gamble's false advertisements are all over TV stations, ranging from washing powder advertisements in Guo Donglin for visiting communities and holding seminars (the advertising law clearly stipulates that advertisements are not allowed to appear in the form of interviews and seminars) to shampoo advertisements that shine after fine hairdressing. I want to say goodbye to you, from olay cosmetics that are washed or wiped white to SKII, Procter & Gamble. Maybe the quality of your products abroad is really good, but please don't fool China consumers, or you will leave.