News 1+ 1 In the face of China's successive moves, how much time does India have to correct its mistakes?

News 1+ 1- How much time is left for India to "correct its mistakes"?

Program guide:

Comments:

Illegal border crossing, illegal invasion. Yesterday, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China issued the document "The fact that Indian border guards crossed the border into Indian territory at the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border and China's position".

201July 2 news:

Further explain to the international community the truth of the Indian army's cross-border incident and comprehensively expound the position of the China government.

Comments:

With the utmost goodwill and a high degree of restraint, the government and people of China have never wavered in their determination to defend their territorial sovereignty.

2065438+July 20, 2007 Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Lu Kang:

The withdrawal of Indian border guards who illegally crossed the border to the Indian side of the border line is the premise and basis of any meaningful dialogue between China and India.

Comments:

History, reality, jurisprudence and morality, see how the Indian government ends up.

CCTV reporter in New Delhi Lin Li:

Indian officials and media have kept a relatively low profile in the past month.

Comments:

News 1+ 1 Today's concern: How much time is left for India to "correct mistakes"?

Moderator Zhang Yu:

Good evening and welcome to the live news 1+ 1.

At the beginning of the program, we first pay attention to a news picture. This news photo has aroused great concern these two days. This photo reflects the scene of Indian border guards illegally crossing the border and invading the Chinese side in the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border. We see that this red line along the ridge is a boundary of the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border, and this side is our territory. The soldiers in the photo are Indian border guards and Indian vehicles crossing the border. This happened more than a month ago, and in June 18, Indian soldiers and vehicles were still stranded in China. Just yesterday, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China issued a 12-page document on this incident, explaining the fact that Indian border guards illegally crossed the border and China's position. So what signal will this document release, what direction will this incident go in the future, and what is India's attitude? Today we will focus on.

Comments:

Forty-five days have passed since the army of a country illegally crossed the undisputed border and invaded our territory. What is the truth of the "Sino-Indian border confrontation" widely reported by the world media? Yesterday, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued an important document in response to the Indian army's illegal occupation of the Donglang area in China.

201July 2 news:

Today, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued the fact that Indian border guards crossed the border into Indian territory at the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border and China's position.

Comments:

This document, published in official website, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, has *** 12 pages, of which 6 pages are written, the rest are schematic drawings of Indian troops crossing the border, and there are two photos of Indian troops crossing the border. Some media called this "the longest statement to date". This document is also published in English.

China, why did you release this position paper? Why did you choose to release it at this time? Yesterday, Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Geng Shuang explained: The purpose is to further explain to the international community the truth of the Indian army's cross-border incident and comprehensively expound the position of the China government.

In view of the Indian army's cross-border behavior, the position paper of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs clearly defines it to the international community as "invading China's territory and violating China's territorial sovereignty". And restore the event again: "On June 20 17 16, China carried out road construction in Donglang area. Moreover, India was notified in advance, which showed goodwill to the maximum extent. On June 18, more than 270 Indian border guards, armed with weapons and equipment, crossed the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border at Dokala Pass and entered China to obstruct China's road construction activities, causing tension. "

The document pointed out: "Donglang area is located in Yadong County, Xizang Autonomous Region City, China, and is an indisputable territory of China."

In order to prove this fact, the original Tibetan-Indian Treaty signed by 1890 and the diplomatic documents of China and India in history are attached to the document. And clearly pointed out: "Both Chinese and Indian governments have inherited the 1890 treaty, and the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border determined on this basis has been delineated. For a long time, the two countries have exercised jurisdiction according to the boundary line determined by the 1890 treaty and have no objection to the specific direction of the boundary line. "

In addition to the course and nature of the incident, the documents of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs also describe in detail that after the Indian invasion, China has always exercised a high degree of restraint and repeatedly negotiated with India through diplomatic means.

China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of National Defense and China's Embassy in India have repeatedly made solemn representations to India in Beijing and New Delhi, strongly demanding that India respect China's territorial sovereignty and immediately withdraw its border guards across the border.

Since June 19, China has been making solemn representations to India through diplomatic channels, strongly protesting and condemning India's illegal invasion, and demanding that India immediately withdraw the Indian border guards who are about to cross the border to the Indian side of the border.

However, a month and a half later, the Indian army remained in China. Yesterday's document also revealed the latest situation. By the end of July, more than 40 Indian border guards and/KLOC-0 bulldozers were still illegally stranded in China. Previously, the number of Indian troops crossing the border reached more than 400, and the depth of crossing the border reached 180 meters.

News broadcast:

China has exercised a high degree of restraint since the incident. But no country should underestimate the determination of the government and people of China to defend its territorial sovereignty. China will take all necessary measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.

Comments:

"In 45 days, the Sino-Indian border confronted." Yesterday, this heavy document issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs contains data and truth, puts facts on jurisprudence, comprehensively restores the truth of the incident, and makes the international community recognize India's unfounded so-called excuses. Today, this 2800-word document has also been published in the original text by domestic and foreign media, which has aroused widespread international concern.

Zhang Yu:

Let's use the map to see the location of the incident. From our point of view, this area is the Donglang area, which is located in Xizang Autonomous Region, China, with Indian in the west and Bhutan in the south. This boundary line is the boundary line of the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border, which was clearly stipulated in the Sino-British Conference Tibet-India Treaty of 1890, and was later recognized by the Chinese and Indian governments. Just last month, on June 18, suddenly, more than 270 Indian border guards drove two bulldozers across the Dokala Pass and illegally crossed the border into China 100 meters. What is the nature of this behavior? The document issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday clearly pointed out that Indian border guards openly crossed the border recognized by both sides, encroached on China's territory and violated China's territorial sovereignty. So today, in China, there are still more than 40 Indian border guards and/kloc-0 bulldozers stranded in that place. So what kind of signal is this document released by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday? Let's connect with Rong Ying, vice president of China Institute of International Studies. Hello, Dean Rong, the full name of this document released by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday is "The fact that Indian border guards crossed the border into China at the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border and China's position", from which we can learn. So what level of file is such a file? This file is not common at ordinary times. What signal is this document releasing and what role can it play?

Rong Ying, Vice President of China Institute of International Studies:

The fact that Indian border guards illegally crossed the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border into China and the relevant position issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs should be said to be very formal and serious government documents. Indeed, such documents were not common in the past. Last year, I remember that we also released relevant documents on the South China Sea issue. On the one hand, as mentioned above, these documents make the Economic Committee clearly understand the relevant facts. The second is mainly to show our position and attitude on this issue, and more importantly, to express our idea of solving this problem, hoping to convey this message so that India can clearly understand the facts, take measures to correct this mistake as soon as possible, and restore peace and tranquility on the Sino-Indian border as soon as possible.

Zhang Yu:

Historically, what role do you think the release of such a document will play in solving the problem?

Rong Ying:

This mainly depends on the Indian side. It should be said that we made it very clear in our position paper, and also put forward the premise and basis for solving cross-border incidents, that is, India will unconditionally withdraw its border guards who illegally invaded our territory. Only after India takes this measure can we conduct meaningful and relevant negotiations.

Zhang Yu:

We have also been paying attention to the progress of the incident. We saw that on June 18, more than 270 Indian soldiers and two bulldozers illegally crossed the border and invaded the territory of China. At that time, more than 400 Indian border guards entered China, and now there are more than 40 people, 1 bulldozer. Does this mean that the incident has come to an end?

Rong Ying:

I don't think it should be said that the incident itself has not fundamentally changed. Although the number of people has decreased, it only shows that the confrontation between the two sides at the scene may have eased. However, as long as one of the border guards illegally enters the country on the spot and invades our territory, this problem will not be solved. More importantly, even after India's border guards who illegally invaded our territory were all withdrawn to his side, the follow-up problems still existed, and the investigation of the incident itself and how to settle it in the future should be put on the agenda, so I find it difficult to predict this issue, and I can't say how it is now, let alone come to an end.

Zhang Yu:

From the report just now, we can see that the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border is actually uncontroversial, and both Chinese and Indian governments recognize this historical evolution. However, the Indian border guards openly and illegally crossed the border and invaded the territory of China, which can be said to be a flagrant violation of international norms and also caused an uproar in the international community. So why did India do this? Let's look at the reasons given by India.

One of the reasons is that India is based on the tradition of consulting with the royal family of Bhutan on issues of common interest. After coordination with the royal family of Bhutan, Indian personnel from Donglang area came to boycott China, and the boycott is still going on. Just now, we saw the map. Bhutan is actually in the south of Donglang area, so India's explanation means that they are actually taking the lead for Bhutan. What do you think of India's explanation?

Rong Ying:

This statement is very ridiculous. On the one hand, we can find that although Bhutan issued a statement under the pressure of India, it did not mention India's participation in this matter, and the publication of this statement was far from the outbreak of the incident. In fact, it has been 1 1 day since the Indian army illegally invaded our territory and issued a statement in Bhutan, so it is more important for Bhutan for India to intervene in such issues. This is totally untenable. Our previous position paper clearly stated that the Sino-Indian border in Sikkim section has been demarcated, and Donglang area belongs to China. This is beyond dispute. We will build roads in our own place and improve traffic conditions. This is very reasonable and legal. China and Africa have not solved the border issue, but since the 1980s, we have conducted 24 rounds of border negotiations in a peaceful and friendly atmosphere. In other words, the border issue between China and China has nothing to do with India as a third party, and India has no right to claim territory for Bhutan.

Zhang Yu:

Obviously, from the explanation just given by Dean Rong, another reason stated by the Indian Ministry of Foreign Affairs is absurd and untenable, that is, India is deeply worried about China's behavior, saying that China's road construction in Donglang area means great damage and changes the status quo, which has serious security risks for India. These are two reasons put forward by India. Obviously, these two reasons are full of loopholes and ridiculous, and they cannot be used as the reason for India's blatant violation of international principles and illegal occupation of China's territory.

Comments:

The Sino-Indian border confrontation has lasted for more than a month, but China's position has not changed. The document issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday also re-emphasized China's position.

201July 2 news:

The border issue between China and Africa is a matter between China and Africa and has nothing to do with India. India has no right to interfere or obstruct the process of China-Africa border negotiations. China will take all necessary measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests. China urges India to immediately withdraw the border guards who are about to cross the border to the Indian side of the border line, thoroughly investigate this illegal border crossing incident, properly resolve this incident as soon as possible, and restore peace and tranquility in the border areas between the two countries.

Comments:

China-Africa border has nothing to do with India; The Indian side immediately and unconditionally withdrew the border guards who crossed the border. The document issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday, including these two articles, comprehensively expounded the position of the China government. In fact, since the incident, China's position has not changed, and both the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of National Defense have been making statements.

Deputy Director of the Information Bureau of the Ministry of National Defense Janice, spokesman of the Ministry of National Defense:

China's determination and will to defend the country's territorial sovereignty are unshakable, and it will safeguard its territorial sovereignty and security interests at all costs. Chinese border guards have taken emergency measures on the spot and will further strengthen targeted deployment and training.

Comments:

In fact, since the Sino-Indian border confrontation, China has frequently issued clear and firm voices on this incident, including three responses from the Ministry of National Defense, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has responded 16 times so far. In an interview with reporters in Bangkok on July 24th, Foreign Minister Wang Yi said, "The right and wrong of this issue is very clear. Even senior Indian officials have publicly stated that Indian soldiers have not entered Indian territory. Solving this problem is also very simple, that is, to quit honestly. " Comparatively speaking, what is India's attitude towards this matter?

CCTV reporter in New Delhi Lin Li:

No matter from the frequency of media reports or the frequency of official positive responses, it is not too much, which is an abnormal situation. Some analysts believe that there may be two reasons. The first is that India may think it inappropriate to publicize it in a big way. First, India illegally crossed the border. If they continue to publicize in a big way, they will be caught in the embarrassment of thieves calling for a thief. In addition, Indian officials may not want this incident to escalate into a thorny scene.

Comments:

In the official voice channel of India, the regular press conference of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is the most important way to respond to the opposition between China and India and the voice of China. According to the reporter's description, India's response on these occasions has no substance.

Lin Li:

On July 20th, Indian Foreign Minister Swaraj declared in their Indian Parliament that all other countries supported India's position on the Sino-Indian border confrontation, but I remember that at the regular press conference on July 27th, an Indian reporter asked Bagre about this issue, and Bagre's answer was actually rather vague. He didn't answer directly, and he didn't list some specific countries.

Comments:

In a report on July 23rd, Global Times also described in detail the scene of Indian diplomatic press conference. It is mentioned that at the press conference on July 20th, in response to a series of responses from Indian diplomatic spokesman Bagre, "the reporters at the scene didn't seem to buy it, and then some reporters switched from English to Hindi to ask questions, trying to get more accurate answers. However, judging from their reaction, they are still not satisfied with the answer. After the meeting, some Indian media reporters complained that Bagre's words were the same as two weeks ago. "

Lin Li:

The Indian Ministry of Foreign Affairs holds a regular press conference every Thursday afternoon. This Thursday, that is, today's press conference was temporarily cancelled and rescheduled to tomorrow. External analysis may also be because the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is not ready to respond to the position paper on page 12 released by China yesterday.

Comments:

At the same time, while paying attention to China's tough voice, the Indian media kept revealing the official attitude of India. According to India's Financial Express on July 2 1, "Indian officials said that in order to ensure that the confrontation does not escalate into a conflict, the diplomats of the two countries are currently adopting" secret diplomacy "to deal with the border confrontation, and the Indian ambassador to China is looking for ways to make both sides retreat from the confrontation without losing face."

On July 3 1 day, the Indian media expressed such a question: "Are we ready to confront China for many years? Do we have a plan for a decent retreat? "

Zhang Yu:

Just over ten minutes ago, the Indian Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded to this incident for the first time 17, in which it expressed the view that China's words now mean peace, and we should not only listen to his words, but also watch his actions. First of all, while China has shown good will and informed communication, India brazenly sent troops to illegally cross the border. This is by no means for peace. Second, it has happened for more than a month. India illegally detained armed men to build roads in the rear and hoard materials. This is by no means for peace. Third, in the case that the facts of illegal border crossing are conclusive, the Indian side does not reflect on its own mistakes, but throws out all kinds of strange theories. This is by no means for peace. Fourth, despite China's repeated diplomatic representations, India not only refused to withdraw its personnel and equipment across the border, but also made unreasonable demands on China, lacking sincerity. This is by no means for peace. So, Dean Rong, what is the purpose of China's blatant violation of international norms, illegal border crossing and invasion of its territory?

Rong Ying:

It should be said that the main purpose of this cross-border incident is to prevent and interfere with China's road construction in Donglang area and our territory, but he still wants to interfere with and obstruct the border negotiation process between China and Bhutan. By creating disputes through this, Donglang area is actually an indisputable territory belonging to China, and this area can achieve an Indian goal in this area. I think it's dangerous. Indeed, as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said just now, all this is definitely not for peace. Now he proposes a solution, even a peaceful solution. This is all lies and deception.

Zhang Yu:

Please predict the future trend of this incident, and what will happen if India openly violates international law.

Rong Ying:

Simply put, the consequences are very serious, because India illegally crossed the already demarcated border in Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border. This is a flagrant violation of international law and the basic norms of international relations, and it also violates the Five Principles of Peace advocated by China and India. According to the relevant provisions of international law, the handling of such international violations is actually very clear. First of all, India must correct its mistakes and unconditionally withdraw its border guards. Next, according to relevant regulations, an in-depth investigation should be conducted. As a country like India, it should be based on relevant international laws and the responsibilities of relevant countries, including state compensation and so on. As our victim, China, we have the right to take necessary countermeasures in accordance with relevant international laws, including some of our self-defense measures. So I think India should realize the seriousness of the current problem and take effective measures to solve it as soon as possible. Only in this way can we truly maintain peace and tranquility in the border areas and create favorable conditions for the stable development of bilateral relations.

Zhang Yu:

Thank you, Dean Rong. At the end of the program, I want to make it clear that the armed personnel illegally crossing the border in India can only be withdrawn to India, which is the premise and foundation of the friendly dialogue between China and India.