What does the ending of Butterfly Effect 3 mean?

1. The butterfly effect is not a ghost film, but a consequence of time and space legends. It is definitely not possible to say that you are reborn or possessed by your soul. Therefore, it is impossible for the hero's daughter to be possessed by his sister (I am convinced of this statement, so the theory of possession can be dispelled)

2. Some people say that the end of the story is the beginning, and the protagonist himself shuttles at the end. I think this statement is also wrong. You should know that the shuttle has all the memories before and after the shuttle. The hero can't be so surprised to hear his daughter's name when he wakes up in the car. He should know, so the ending of the story is also the result of shuttle.

3. Although many people think that there is a connection between the little girl's burning doll and the hero's sister's burning, and that the fire was set by the hero's daughter, I thought so at first, at least this idea can help me get out of this annoying problem quickly, but anyone who has seen Butterfly III knows that people who travel through time and space do not go back by time machine, not by what age, but by recalling their bodies at that time. On the day of the fire, the little girl didn't exist. If you want to say that she is sperm, I don't believe it. At that time, the hero 15 years old. When her mother conceived her, the hero was at least 20 years old. Sperm cannot survive in the body for five years. (So it is impossible for girls to go back and set fire. )

It is also impossible for the hero to set fire. Anyone who has seen movies knows that the history of people who travel through time and space has changed, but the memory still exists. So if the hero set fire, it means that the hero knows that his sister must die before setting fire, and he can't save her.

There are only three possibilities about fire.

1. This is what I saw on the Internet. It was released by the hero's father. Because of the theory of heredity, the hero's father may have the ability to shuttle. Later, when he knew that his daughter was abnormal, he had to give up one to ensure family harmony. So he killed his daughter with a shuttle.

2. With the statement of "one", you have to produce the statement of "two". Maybe the hero's father didn't shuttle, but the old man who taught the hero the ability to shuttle set the fire. The reason is the same as above, because the story says that the old man teaches the protagonist to shuttle, but it doesn't say that the ability to shuttle can be taught by everyone or depends on his natural qualifications, so there may be three or four people in this film besides the hero, his sister and the old man who can shuttle. The hero's father may or may not have (not to mention his daughter for the time being, because as I said before, even if he can travel, he won't set fire), so it is still possible.

Maybe this fire is an ordinary arson case. We can imagine that this is the beginning in itself, because there is fire and everything behind. Arson is just an unrelated arsonist, and it is not impossible to break the police.

So I think this fire is just the beginning of a story. From the above analysis, it is a problem that does not need to be entangled. Whatever it is, it won't affect the main line. Otherwise, the hero won't just save his sister, not put out the fire, or go to see who the murderer is, which shows that the director didn't intend to portray the fire too abstruse from the beginning, so we all thought the fire too complicated and dragged the people behind us in, and the result was a dead end.

5. About the strange behavior of the little girl

Of course, this is not as simple as a fire. Deliberately given close-ups, there must be a purpose. It's impossible to say it's possessed, and it's impossible to go back

Now there are only two statements left. I'll tell you why I believe the second statement more.

First, the little girl also has the ability to shuttle, just because the hero who brought the doll that day remembered his sister, and he went to save her sister, and then the little girl shuttled and burned the doll. I don't want this to happen. Personally, I think this statement is also wrong, because shuttlers have memories. If so, the hero has memories of getting married and having children later, and knows that his wife is the sister of his first love, and now he loves her first love. Then you won't forget your first love when you have sex with a bar girl in the story, and you won't forget the experience of saving your first love. Besides, if you remember, the hero saw the doll and knew that his sister had to die. It makes no sense for girls to burn dolls. Even if he sees the doll, the hero will never save it again. )

Second, this is my own analysis, which I think is the most reasonable. Let's think about it. What is the ultimate theme of the butterfly effect? It doesn't mean that a small change changes a person's life, but it shows that no matter how you change the past, the result must have a balance point. You gain something, you lose something. You saved your sister's parents and died. It's clear here that your daughter has been a psycho since she killed her sick sister. Here you are. Why does the daughter and sister have the same name, not the possession of the sister, but to tell everyone about this balance point? The hero destroys a serial killer created by himself, and at the same time creates another killer who is more abnormal (at least my sister is not so abnormal at her daughter's age). The doll was burned, not because the little girl knew that her sister was burned to death, but to show the little girl's abnormal condition and violent tendency. Why use fire? It may be that the director took the life of the perverted sister in order to trigger a symmetry.

Some people say that the end of 3 paves the way for 4. I can assure you that even if the butterfly effect is 4, it is absolutely impossible to continue the story of 3. Anyone who has seen The Butterfly Effect 3 and The Arrival of Death knows that in fact, every movie can be continued, but the director definitely does it for the simple reason that it is a thought-provoking movie. If it continues, it will only make the story clearer, but it will lose its thought-provoking selling point. In fact, if you understand the main idea of the butterfly effect, you will find how reasonable my story is. The story is over. It's not that my daughter can shuttle or direct everything. Even if she wants to direct, she can't. After all, what the hero wants to kill in the end is his own discovery and decision, not the little girl.