Why do people kill people?

? On the battlefield, either you die or I live, and killing is necessary. Everyone has the right to strive for survival. Is war wrong? See what it's for. People say that aggression is wrong, but from the perspective of interests, if the sacrifice of 300 people can bring happiness to 30 thousand people, no decision-maker will refuse. At that time, sacrificing 300 people was an absolutely affordable choice. And these 300 people, instead of choosing 300 children to die, choose 3 thousand randomly and then die 300. Everyone thinks that he may live, and he is likely to live. The death rate is one in ten, which is not very high, but not as good as some less serious diseases. It's hope at work. In Pandora's box, the last thing is hope. Like many people, she thinks this is the last redemption. But maybe not. Hope may be the greatest evil in the end. Only it can make people struggle in endless pain. This is the meaning of all pain. If there is no hope of persistence, how can all the evils in the world be vented? And hope is hope after all, maybe the future will get better, and the way out is not completely gone. That's what people think, and they walk on this endless ascetic road without hesitation. When I first thought like this, I felt extremely confused. Is the road to life an ascetic monk? Hope is just bait to lure people to bear? If so, what's the point of life? I have no answers to these questions. But I'm not dead either. Or because of hope. For me, these questions may still have answers. I must live well, maybe I can see the answer in my lifetime. Only then did I realize that I am an optimistic person, and I have always been optimistic. The soldiers who took part in the war set out with such hope. I believe every soldier is an optimistic person, otherwise they can't face those cruelties. Everything that seems unreasonable can lead to the most reasonable result. What seems to be the most unreasonable thing is actually not that serious. It's just killing between people. Brothers and fathers eat meat from time to time. It's really common to look at history when people kill people. Pity on the battlefield is really cruel and stupid. Since you chose war, you gave up your life. On the battlefield, life has no dignity. Artists don't understand, and they will only make some irrelevant remarks afterwards. People who care don't understand, and those who do don't care. I just don't care because some things are unclear. In the history so far, peace has been bought by war. I dare not say that fighting with each other is human nature. I can only say that human nature is definitely not kind. But whoever wants to tell me that human nature is evil, I absolutely don't support it. You know, what is good and what is evil is a big problem in itself, an unsolved big problem. Sometimes, killing people is for the good. Sometimes, saving people is evil. The difference between good and evil is best judged by motive rather than result. I saved a wicked man and killed 10 thousand innocent people, even if it was out of kindness and compassion, I can't call it good. I dare not judge a behavior easily before I see the result. But the result is easy to see. We chose the simple method: motivation. Unfortunately, I can't find the answer from the motive. We can't admit that unreasonable things are caused by reasonable things. Although this is the case many times. In fact, the problem is very simple, very simple. ? Why are you so cruel? I think of Sartre, he said, your freedom is my freedom; Everything else is hell. People go to the opposite side, probably because of seemingly insignificant reasons, such as the weather, such as geographical location, such as discordant customs, conflict of beliefs. Once the opposition, kindness to you is cruelty to me. At that time, your freedom was my non-freedom, no longer a philosophical concept, but a living fact. Look, touch, feel. You think you have a reason to live. If you don't kill him, you will die. He thinks he has a reason to live. If I don't kill you, he will die. So, people will kill people. If you are lucky, you may not die. If you are unlucky, you may all die. Humanism is a kind of morality, specifically, virtue, not Tao. I have seen it thoroughly. Heaven and earth are ruthless, and everything is a dog. Only people take people seriously. Invisible laws don't take people seriously. It's a long road, Xiu Yuan, and I don't take people seriously. You are such a thing. With such a lucky opportunity, there is such an unfortunate opportunity. So people kill people. Even worse than murder, brothers and fathers can kill each other. Just to survive. Kindness in war, like the aurora in the polar night sky, is gorgeous and beautiful, but it is just an illusory dream. What is true is the dark night as heavy as black iron. Mozi said, non-attack, universal love. Defend if you don't attack, but people say that attack is the best defense. Fraternity is a joke. Everyone loves it, just as no one loves it. But I know, no offense, no defense, love or not. He and Plato have the same ideal. If everyone is good, the world will be peaceful. It's Lao Tzu again. He knows that the feud between people is hopeless. Therefore, he said, the neighbors look at each other, the voices of chickens and dogs hear each other, and the people die of old age. In this way, without attack and love, the world is at peace. It is for small countries and few people. That is an ideal, an ideal that can never be realized. Looking through history, we will find that people are getting closer and closer, and they are also struggling in the process of getting closer and closer. All wars are inseparable from this background. The size of the world is inextricably linked with its neighbors. The world has become smaller and the whole world is struggling together. Lu Xun said that reading ancient and modern books, full of benevolence and morality, has become the word cannibalism. He saw the truth, but he didn't seem to think about the reason. Why is this happening? I'm not sure. I just don't say. I can only vaguely feel that the so-called politics must be like this. I only know that the obscurantism policy is a useful thing, not a good thing. I also know that human beings who have made progress for thousands of years look smart, but they seem to have not changed at all, or even regressed. Zou Ji satirized the King of Qi in coachable, and after the wind in coachable, "at the beginning, the ministers remonstrated, and it was crowded. After a few months, from time to time. Although you want to speak after the year, you can't enter. " Time goes back to the Ming dynasty, and now people comment that the Ming dynasty died of eunuchs. It was not enough to call a bright moon that year. We should put those officials who have something to scold and nothing to scold in the first place. More than 2000 years ago, some people understood that it was dangerous to force people to take this road. Two thousand years ago, before the enlightened king, all the subjects knew that words could not be advanced, so they said nothing; Five hundred years ago, the unscrupulous behavior of officials brought disaster to the country and people. What did we see today? Anyone who has access to the internet can become as powerful as a speech official in the Ming Dynasty. Their criticism is what we call public opinion. I know many people don't talk nonsense like this. I also know that those who scold badly on weekdays can't say a useful word in the face of a real test. These people seem to have nothing to do with what I want to say today, but they are not. It is they who shout how important the dignity of life is, that there are many humanitarianism, and that peace is preferred to war in peacetime. The so-called grandiose, how well they interpret. People who have never been hungry say they are terribly hungry, but they are just talking. Sometimes, I seem to understand that people who climb out of the battlefield and the pile of corpses look at the world differently. There are some obstacles that people cannot cross. After all, I know that mine always seems to be just like it, and I can't really understand those soldiers who come back from the battlefield. His murder, his murder. If you can't sympathize with Smith, you'd better shut up about all this. Even if you can sympathize with his way, you'd better say less. The most disgusting thing in this world is not true evil, but hypocrisy. Truth is a pair of eyes. One eye is evil and the other is kind. How often do our speeches measure reality by ideal standards? The ideal world is peaceful. In reality, there are battlefields everywhere. Don't think it's far from us. Once you think it is far away, it will come to you immediately. The battlefield will tell you, and no one can know.