Can friends who have read novels tell us the difference between novels and animations?

I think the novel can describe things in detail, such as "colorful silk gathers flowers to grow ears" and "plucking eight groups of ears" in the Red Chamber, and "several young plants are born in the remains of stone lions, with purple flowers on their branches, which are beautiful and sad". These have become the flash lights in the animation, and there is no original atmosphere of the novel.

The description of psychology and expression in the novel is easier and more acceptable to readers. Changing to animation doesn't mean people have to explain it in fog.

In addition to animation

I think the characteristic of animation lies in its visual effect. After all, most of the information people receive is visual information. For example, when they think of the Monkey King, they usually have pictures in their minds. Visualizing the plot can also be accepted by more people.

This is my general view. If you ask about specific works, please perfect the questions. thank you