As a lawyer, what is the strangest divorce case you have encountered?

The woman sued for divorce because of long-term domestic violence, and I represent her.

during the divorce, the man said that the child was not his own, and took out a paternity test report from a foreign country six months ago.

the woman refused to approve. It is said that after marriage, work and home are two points and one line, and there is no affair with other men. Whatever the man says. Promise me again and again I said, if you are so sure, go and apply for an appraisal.

the court entrusts the appraisal. Results The appraisal results entrusted by the court were exactly the same as those produced by the man. Non-biological!

The woman still insists that the child belongs to the man. What should I do? Is there another way?

It's impossible to do it again. There is no reasonable and legal reason!

I said, is it possible that the child was wrong in the hospital when he was born? Either you and the child have an appraisal, and if it is not yours, you can prove it. The court agrees with me. It can be done by itself or entrusted by the court.

the woman doesn't agree and doesn't approve the appraisal report that is not her own!

finally, of course, the court adopted the non-biological appraisal report as the basis for deciding the case.

Do you think the woman is so persistent to save face, or are there really other possibilities?

some people say that if the man's mother was pregnant with twins at the beginning, but the other one didn't survive, but was embedded in another embryo, that is, the man's body, it may also happen that the identification is not biological. Never seen a case, read a report.

Welcome @ Shanghai Yang Lawyer

A case experienced by a lawyer friend.

Both husband and wife are teachers, and their feelings are very good. A man has always had a thorn in his heart, that is, his son looks less and less like himself.

Both husband and wife have round faces, but the children have long faces. Once a child had pneumonia, the man went to a doctor and secretly did a blood type test. As a result, both husband and wife had type B blood, while the son had type ab blood.

The doctor told the man that if both parents have type B blood, the child's blood type may be type B or type O, and there will be no type A or ab.

The man loves the child very much, and said nothing during the child's hospitalization. However, after the child was discharged from the hospital, he took the divorce agreement and asked the woman to sign it. The property was divided into half and the child belonged to the woman.

But the woman insisted that she had never cheated, so the man took the child to a DNA test, and the results also showed that the man and the child were not related by blood.

The man was determined to get a divorce, and finally they went to court.

my friend is a woman's lawyer. The lawyer suggested that the woman and the child should have a paternity test, and the result was that the woman and the child were not related by blood.

Obviously, the child was wrongly reported, and the man took the hospital where the baby was delivered to court.

Originally, the case ended here, but the world is big and full of wonders, and what belongs to you will always belong to you.

half a month later, the lawyer took another case, which, like the previous case, was that the man and the child were not related by blood.

after the lawyer advised the woman, the result of the paternity test was that she was not related to the child.

Surprisingly, the lawyer found that the photo of the boy in the second case was very similar to the man in the first case, and his blood type was the same. The lawyer checked the information of the last case and found that the date of birth of the children in the two cases was the same, and the time was three minutes apart. And they were hospitalized in the same hospital and ward, and they were all boys.

In the evening, the lawyer asked the two parties to meet. After the meeting, the two children played together. They were classmates, and both of them had been to each other's home to play.

after the lawyer explained the situation to both parties, both parties took their children to have a paternity test the next day. The identification results prove that the two sides are holding the wrong child.

It was a happy ending, but the two children never agreed to exchange. After all, they have lived with each other's parents for eight years and have long regarded each other's parents as their own parents.

I am a lawyer specializing in marriage and family affairs. There are countless wonderful cases. Tell me one of the most wonderful cases.

the client is a woman, and the man has cheated on the opposite sex for a long time. The man saved the high-definition video of him and the opposite sex outside marriage in his mobile phone, and the woman collapsed after seeing it ...

The woman came to me and asked me to help her file a lawsuit for divorce, and the evidence was submitted ...

As a lawyer, I have seen many wonderful things, especially in divorce cases. The most wonderful case is not represented by me. One of my colleagues represented the man in a divorce case. The case was sued by the woman, and she asked for a divorce. The man resolutely disagrees with the divorce for the sake of his two children. Under normal circumstances, he files a lawsuit for divorce for the first time. If the other party resolutely disagrees and there is no particularly hard evidence to prove that the other party has a major fault, the judge will usually disallow the divorce. The woman said in a hurry, do you think the two children are yours? Actually, none of them are yours After hearing this, the man made a paternity test, and it was not his own, so he agreed to divorce and the marriage finally got divorced. But this is not wonderful. I have met several cases of raising children for others. Strangely enough, after the divorce, this woman often went to our law firm to find a lawyer who represented the man. Her reason was that I had someone outside, and the man had long known and never cared. This time the man agreed to divorce, it must have been instigated by this bad lawyer. It was too bad for this lawyer to destroy other people's families. This logic is so wonderful that it is difficult for her to make sense. Our lawyer was completely helpless when she met this kind of woman, so as soon as she came, the troubled lawyer immediately ran away, and others also stayed away, only pitying our director, who had to receive her personally every time, and her eyes were low. For such a long time, she slowly calmed down and stopped visiting.

Real case, refresh your three views!

the first case: in 216, a female client contacted me and prepared to file a lawsuit for divorce. The reason she gave was very simple. She had a child after two years of marriage, but when the child was 4 years old, she found that the father of the child was bisexual. By a very coincidental opportunity, she found some strange clothes that the father usually prepared under the desk in the father's office, and then she negotiated with the father and finally reached this conclusion. She was devastated at that time and wanted a divorce, but after going home for two days, she said that the marriage would not be separated for the time being, because the father of the child assured him that she could meet her financial needs, but this matter could not be told to others. For the sake of family and children, she can only bear it. And then it's nothing in the future.

the second case, which is some cases represented in 218, is that we are the defendant, the man and the woman suing for divorce, and dividing the contents involved in the same property of husband and wife, from home appliances, furniture, security doors, daily household appliances to pots and pans, and even tablecloths. There are dozens of property items listed before and after. The plaintiff even asked for a piece of cover cloth on the purchased water dispenser to be divided. At that time, when the defendant saw the plaintiff's complaint, the defendant collapsed and was very angry. Of course, in the end, large items such as furniture and household appliances were handled by the court, and other items were not handled.

the third case, a non-divorce lawsuit in 215. The reason why he is a non-divorce lawsuit is that the case ended up in vain and did not enter the proceedings. The woman is a grass-roots worker, and the man is a freelancer, both of whom are in their thirties. When two people got married, they each had their own ideas. The woman was worried that she was old and would be gossiped behind the leader all day long, while the man was worried about being pointed at because of his sexual orientation. In the end, two people got married, but only in form. Before marriage, both parties agreed that the property belongs to each other and their private lives do not interfere with each other. Each month, each party takes out a certain amount of money as a public fund to pay the relevant expenses such as water, electricity, coal and heating of the living house. Two people have no children and no husband and wife life, so they live together in order not to give others a bite of food. Can you believe it?

the fourth case, a divorce dispute that has just been closed. The man sued for divorce three times, and the defendant first disagreed and then disagreed with the divorce. The reason why the defendant disagreed with the divorce was that both parties still lived in the same house (one person and one room). The reason for agreeing to divorce was that the information investigated by her lawyer showed that the man had a large amount of credit cards, savings cards and Alipay in and out of the account within two years, so he wanted to advocate that the man transfer nearly one million yuan of property, but the man fully proved it. The man's evidence can completely prove that the man can't maintain his family's living expenses by means of credit cards, online loans, etc., which is basically the mode of robbing Peter to pay Paul. The so-called transfer of property simply does not exist. Seeing this situation, the woman gave up the lawsuit and resolutely refused to agree to divorce. The woman knows very well that the man still needs to repay the mortgage every month, and she will have a place to live without divorce, and she can also get the money from the man to repay the mortgage. Before the trial, the woman found a job, but after the court ruled, the woman resigned directly at home. The man repeatedly felt that he couldn't get rid of it, and he racked his brains to raise money to maintain the normal life of his family. In the end, he was detained by the woman with a hat that transferred nearly one million property, which was "unjust panic"!

I met a female teacher who cheated on her male colleague and gave birth to a boy with her male colleague.

1. The female teacher's husband is a soldier, and the male colleague hooked up with the female teacher when the soldier was not at home. As a result, the two of them were in collusion with each other and gave birth to a son. The poor soldier always thought that the child was his own, until the child was three or four years old, and the military personnel accidentally discovered that the child was not his own.

2. The result of the discovery of the soldier's husband is that the soldier divorced the female teacher, and the female teacher left the house with her children born with her lover, and the house and car belonged to the soldier's husband. In the struggle for property, the female teacher still knew that she was wrong and didn't want anything. After all, she was the wrong party.

3. The soldier is a man of great accomplishment. He didn't attack the female teacher or hurt others. It's really not easy to do this. However, the military husband is not a vegetarian, and directly sued the male teacher for breaking the military marriage. The male teacher was sentenced to three years in prison, and the male teacher naturally lost his job.

4. A friend in need is a friend indeed. The female teacher and the male teacher turned against each other and shirked their responsibilities. They all said that the other teacher seduced them. As the male teacher went to prison, the female teacher made a clean break with the male teacher. The female teacher who suffered the consequences herself couldn't stand the strange eyes of her colleagues and left home.

5. Extramarital affairs hurt the military husband, and the male teacher also suffered the consequences, and the female teacher did not benefit. The most pitiful thing is how innocent the children born to the female teacher and the male teacher are. I don't know how children feel when they grow up and know their own life experience.

What do you think about extramarital affairs? Welcome to leave a message for discussion!

Pay attention to @ Suqian lawyer Wu Jie and tell you about the law!

I once knew a woman who had a bad lifestyle. Once she cheated on her at home and was found out by her husband. Her husband was so angry that he accused her of wearing a three-point suit with a man at home. The woman pleaded in court: "If you go to the seaside and have a look, don't all women wear 3-point?"? Don't all men wear underpants? Am I wearing a 3-point at home and another man is wearing underpants? Is it derailed? " After listening to her defense, people felt very ridiculous. This incident was spread into a joke by many people, but it came from real life.

I have represented the strangest divorce case: the man came to us and said that the woman had sued for divorce, but he didn't want a divorce and needed us to be his agent. We specifically asked if there were any legal reasons for divorce (cheating, violence, gambling, drug abuse and other bad habits), and he firmly said no. During the trial, the other party took out a video of him taking a selfie with a third party in bed. After reading it, even the judge changed color and decided to divorce at one time. He couldn't understand why his ex-wife had a video of him and Xiao San. Later, after investigation, he learned that Xiao San provided it to his ex-wife. It's true that two women play together, but it's a pity that he is the only male pig's foot.

the strange case I met was that you didn't think they would get divorced at all.

I met a divorce case. The relationship between the two parties was so good. The woman's demands were met by both the man and the woman. They were in harmony and even walked hand in hand.

so two people divorced, and I tried my best to persuade them to be ineffective. The reason for divorce is even more wonderful. The woman thinks that the man is too good to herself, so good that she has no opinion even if she likes her neighbors.

After the divorce, they moved out of this city, and I hope they will be happy in the distance!

1. Beauty with a dog: Lawyer, I want to divorce him because he can't tolerate my dog!

lawyer: wait, that's it?

Beauty: Yes, I love him very much, and he loves me, but he just can't tolerate my dog. I have kept it for five years, and my parents are dead, so this dog is the only relative ...

Lawyer: He asked you to choose between the dog and him, right?

beauty: yes, I choose dogs! I can find another man, and this is the only dog I have! But I have to make compensation ...

Lawyer: What compensation do you want?

Beauty: I have no job and no income. I can't live with my dog after my divorce, so he has to compensate me ...

Second, plaintiff (female): Judge, I want a divorce.

Judge: Why?

Plaintiff: There are two things. First, he cheated on me. This is a letter of guarantee he wrote to me, saying that he would never cheat again, which proves that he is a recidivist of cheating. Secondly, he is not good at that. Here is his inspection report ... "

Judge: Do you want to prove whether he is good or not? Is it good for others or not for you? Can it be cured?

Plaintiff: The doctors all say he can't do it, but he can do it for others? This kind of person will cheat ...........................................................................................................................................................................

Judge: ...