Is early education necessary?

Compared with children's early education, I think parents' early education is more necessary.

First of all, let me talk about children's early education. I often quote psychologist gesell's "maturity theory", that is, there are two reasons that dominate children's psychological development, namely maturity and learning, and I think maturity is more important. Gesell believes that the development of children's psychology and movements is a process of sequential pattern development, which is determined by the maturity of organisms. In other words, the effect of early education is not great before children are physically immature.

Second, parents should "teach early". Before becoming a parent, we should know more about family education at different ages and set the goals and principles of family education. The core of family education should be from husband and wife to parents. This sentence seems empty, but it contains real truth.

For a simple example, all the babies in the neighborhood are sent to early education, and they have learned this and that. You look anxious and hurry to find your husband: let's let our children participate in early education. However, if you understand the stage characteristics of children's development, you will know that children are so young and physically immature. Early training will get twice the result with half the effort, and these things can be easily done when the child is physically mature.

"Don't let children lose at the starting line" is the wish of every parent. Therefore, many parents report their children to early education classes when they are babbling.

However, the current early education classes are tens of thousands a year. Is it really necessary to start spending so much money on training when children learn to speak?

Girlfriends have encountered such problems before, because their monthly income is not high, and there are car loans, mortgages and family expenses. However, the girlfriend thinks that if they don't want their children to lose at the starting line, they have to spend money, but the husband thinks it is unnecessary, and the husband and wife have also quarreled about it.

The netizens who supported it said this:

Early education can train children's language ability and social communication ability, and cultivate children's sound personality. Let children learn to share, and parents should try their best to cultivate their children.

The netizens who opposed it said this:

Originally, two people were under great pressure, and coupled with early education, the pressure on couples was even greater. Moreover, children are young and can do it at home, and parents can spend time.

The purpose of early education is also to develop children's intelligence. Parents can accompany their children at home, so that children can study with their families and get more happiness in their studies.

To sum up, in the early hours of the morning, my mother felt that whether a child can go to early education depends on his family income. If it is easy to come up with 10 thousand yuan, then give your child early education; If you think it's hard to spend this 10 thousand yuan, there is no need to go to an early education class. After all, family education is the best education.

what do you think? Do you think it is necessary for children to attend early education classes?

Today's early education institutions are really dazzling and varied, and these early education institutions are expensive. Parents feel that they can't let their children lose at the starting line, and they are all confused. Should they send it? If you don't send it, other friends in the neighborhood will, so this is really a problem that bothers everyone.

This is kangaroo's answer:

Is it necessary for us to send our children to early education institutions? What are the considerations?

In fact, whether to send it or not depends on what the early education institutions have done. This needs detailed investigation. If the program is not good, there are still some educational indicators, such as taking children to play some rhythms and learn music together, and some comprehensive physical training is still good, as well as a consideration of your own actual situation, such as your time, such as distance, and the time spent on the road does not match your gains.

And whether his course is a system, what we really need to know is whether the teacher's system is perfect and what is his basis? On the whole, if the quality is high and the special business purpose is not particularly strong, it is irrational to charge completely, I think. This should also be fully investigated.

If so, when is a good time to go?

There is not much need to make children too young. It depends on the family, of course. If the children in this family reach a certain age, they also need certain space activities and various physical exercises. If the family does not have this condition, there are such institutions nearby to meet the needs of children. It is good for mothers and children to exercise together. In this case, children can actually climb, that is, they can walk in about eight months and nine months. If the family conditions are good and there is such space, there is no need to work.

But after one year, especially after 15 months, I think some of them are still worth visiting. The key is to really visit them.

It is very necessary to give children early education, because parents are new parents, and they don't know how to educate their children or how to guide them correctly. Early education institutions generally have professional early education personnel, other requirements for children's growth and development are very clear, and there will be a set of training methods, which have scientific guidance for intellectual development and nutrition, which is very beneficial to growth and development. If parents have the conditions or time, it is best to give their children early education training. When giving them early education, we must choose a formal training institution. Don't trust the so-called small institutions, greedy for small and cheap, greedy for small and cheap, and suffer big losses. It is recommended to go to a formal brand education institution.

In fact, my personal opinion is unnecessary, because:

The best early education is at home, and the best relationship is parent-child relationship. Instead of letting teachers and babies cultivate feelings, it is better to practice it yourself.

On the way to early education, it depends on the baby's state. It is possible that the baby is asleep and the effect of class cannot be guaranteed.

So I still think I can play games with my baby at home and give him enough love. I think this is the best.

My view on this kind of education problem is that everyone should look at his own financial situation and family situation, and no one forces him.

It varies from person to person. In fact, no one can really give you a standard answer to this question. Whether it is useful or not depends on the parents themselves! If you don't know yourself, you can take your children to try it, because many early education institutions can audition now. If you take your child to audition several times and feel that your child has changed, report it. If you don't think it is necessary, don't report it, because there is no specific early education report. The gap between children who have attended early education and children who can't keep up with early education will only appear in the future!

If you are not a self-disciplined person, the cost of early education is more important, because today's times are different.