Sichuan young man was abducted in Henan for 30 years, and then went home to recognize relatives and report his uncle. What is that step?

I think this matter is quite unreasonable. He was only six months old when he was abducted, and there was no record at all. And his biological parents didn't see his uncle kidnap him. Is it too much to pursue his uncle with subjective judgment?

Although we can understand the hatred he and his biological parents have for those who abducted him in those years, based on their subjective thoughts, this hatred cannot be blamed on his uncle. You have to have evidence to report a person. If there is no evidence, it is a false accusation.

Judging from the known facts, there is no substantial evidence that uncle kidnapped him.

First of all, he is only six months old, so it is impossible to remember the person who stole him.

Secondly, his parents didn't see his uncle abducting him, just because he left their sight at that time, and he thought his uncle was guilty.

Third, the police station did interrogate my uncle, but found no evidence.

Under such circumstances, is it really appropriate for you to report your uncle rashly?

Let's see what happened:

1991On the evening of March 29th, a couple from a family in Sichuan asked for help in transplanting rice seedlings during the day. In the evening, everyone who has eaten goes to the neighbor's house in the village to watch TV.

When the couple got home, they found that the door lock of his house had been pried open and their six-month-old second son had disappeared.

At that time, the second brother-in-law who was watching TV together left early and knew that the second son was sleeping alone at home.

So they decided that the second brother-in-law had stolen his son and asked the police to take him away for questioning.

However, the trial ended without any results. The child's uncle firmly denied stealing the child, and the police found no useful information.

After that, the couple began a long road to finding children. It was not until their son was 30 years old that they found the second son by comparing the genetic relationship of DNA.

Then something amazing happened. The son who just found his biological parents submitted a letter of accusation to the local police before returning to his usual place of life, which stated that he was abducted by his uncle. ...

This makes people wonder. At that time, he was only six months old Does he remember who kidnapped him? There is no evidence. That's not good.

You can ask the police to help investigate the kidnapping cases in those years, but there is no substantive evidence, which means there is a problem. Besides, if my uncle didn't steal the results of the follow-up police investigation at all, how could you slander others' reputation?

Let's talk about why they suspect that the second brother-in-law, that is, the second uncle of the child, stole the child.

The main reasons are as follows:

1. Only my second uncle left early.

At that time, it was probably these people who knew that the child was sleeping alone at home.

3. The child's second uncle had the problem of petty theft before.

When the police took my second uncle away for questioning, he jumped out of the window and ran away.

Although the first few seem reasonable, I personally don't think it is like his uncle stole them.

First, no one can guarantee that only a few of them know that the child is sleeping at home alone, in case someone pays attention.

Second, even if no one pays attention, in case a thief happens to come to his house and then finds a six-month-old child and steals the child on impulse.

Third, the uncle and his wife left only one hour before and after. If this uncle really did it, he shouldn't have time to go home.

Stealing a child, especially a relative's child, should we get rid of the child at the first time. Moreover, the place where the couple are located is in the countryside, and it is not so easy to abort the child.

At that time, how could the uncle conclude that the couple would leave their children alone at home? If he didn't know beforehand, how could he think of stealing children?

Even after he saw this situation, it occurred to him that how could he deal with the children silently in such a short time?

If you want to get rid of this child within an hour, you should have someone to see him. The question is, where can he go to contact a good helper to deal with the children in such a short time, and he can go home after handling things in such a short time.

If his uncle does things so neatly, he shouldn't be a thief. He should be an agent, and the time is so accurate.

Summary:

To sum up, I think the loss of the child was an accident.

The key point of this matter should be the young man's foster mother. If you want to know who abducted him at that time, you should find a breakthrough from your foster mother.

However, the young man hasn't told his adoptive mother about his engagement. It is estimated that he will talk to his adoptive mother about it after returning to China this time.

At present, the police have received a letter of accusation and will further investigate the relevant situation of the case. I believe things will come out soon. Let's wait and see.