Which is more powerful, J 10 or J 1 1?

First of all, it must be pointed out that J 10 is a light fighter J 1 1 is heavy fighter. Now because everyone is developing peacefully. There is no direct confrontation between big countries, and the air forces of various countries pay attention to high and low collocation. It is a combination of heavy air defense fighters and light fighters. On the basis of the same industry, the performance of heavy-duty air conditioners is definitely better, but the cost is high. Of course, it is not absolute, it depends on the national requirements.

For example, the main forces of the US Air Force now are F 15 and F 16, and the heavy forces of the Navy used to be F 14. (Now, because the maintenance price is too expensive, it is known that the enlarged version of F 18 F 18e/F has better performance, but at present it is in the United States. The fourth-generation fighter aircraft being equipped by the United States (in Russia and our generation is different from the West, it is called the fifth generation). Heavy fighter is the F22, and the light fighter is JSF. Light fighters are more responsible for the first attack of escort, and heavy fighter is mainly responsible for the air. Of course, because of the large bomb load, and because the current war is mainly a local war, a part of F 15 is converted into F 15E, which is mainly responsible for the ground attack.

Due to historical and national reasons, the competition between Su Huoyi and MIG Design Bureau is fierce. Su -27 series is a fighter with the same level as F 15, while MiG -29 series is not in the same level as F 16 in the United States, and it can also undertake some air defense tasks, but the overall efficiency is still lower than that of Su -27 series. As for MIG-3 1, just like MIG-25, it is a response technology made by a relatively weak party to a technology that the other party can spend more money on. This kind of task is only developed by Russia in the world. Apart from Russia, only India is interested. Needless to say, the reason.

For our country, before J- 10 and J- 1 1 were equipped, the fighter had fallen behind the mainstream generation in the world. ○ 10 and ○1,○ 10 should belong to the middle and low grades as a whole, while ○ 1 1 is the China version of Su -27, that is, high and low grades. But J- 10 was developed only recently, and the whole J- 1 10 was a product decades ago. In terms of electronic fire control equipment, J- 10 is definitely much more advanced. At that time, the aerodynamic shape and other technologies belonged to the third generation fighter (Russia and we call this generation the fourth generation), and the technical basis of the two was the same. These electronic technology radars are actually very easy to upgrade. As long as the 歼 1 1 is upgraded, it can reach 歼 10. Moreover, because 歼1has larger airframe space and take-off weight, its upgrading potential is actually greater than 歼 10, so objectively speaking, the technical level of the two is higher. The greater significance of 歼 10 For our country, it is that we can develop fighters that catch up with the world's technical level. In the past, we always fell behind, and the J-J 10 completely changed this situation, which was a complete technological leap. From light to heavy, step by step. To tell the truth, we developed the J- 10 when the new generation fighter plane has been developed, but it has caught up with the mainstream of the world, and the J-20 has become the latest fighter plane developed synchronously with the mainstream of the world (of course, Americans still lead the trend and are equipped with F22, but we can keep pace with Russia, and Europe has given up developing this generation fighter plane), so J- 10 is one of the advanced fighters we have caught up with.

In fact, the J-20 is just a step for us (it is incomprehensible to say that the American F22 is the fourth generation, Russia and ours are the fifth generation, but the East and the West are different, in fact, the technical level is the first level). The four technologies needed by this generation of aircraft, such as tail nozzle, are still far behind in some aspects, and because we really develop too fast, the short-term reliability may be unstable, but this can be solved and is much simpler than research and development. If the technology is mature and well-equipped, it should be a disadvantage to fight F22 under the same conditions, but it can be countered. Unlike the technical gap between J- 10 and J-1/F22, the exchange ratio will be terrible. Moreover, judging from the land position of our main target, because of the larger and more concealed subgrade radar system, if F22 comes to our airspace to fight against J-20, the gap is likely to be smoothed out or even have an advantage.