Problems in the sentences "It is illegal to rob a police car" and "There is no copper in optical fiber, so stealing is useless"

For similar notices such as "It is illegal to rob a police car" and "There is no copper in optical fiber, it is useless to steal it", everyone can only say "speechless". It is not an exaggeration to say that the ignorant do not know, and we can forgive the ignorant, but such signboards are not done unintentionally by the ignorant.

First of all, "It is illegal to rob police cars." The implication is that "you can rob other cars except police cars and it is not illegal." This is blatantly misleading the public that "only police cars can be robbed." It’s illegal.” It is illegal to do anything expressly prohibited by law. Robbery is expressly prohibited by law. It is not illegal only to rob police cars. Isn't everything illegal? We imagine that this sentence should come from the public security department. It is unimaginable that this sentence should be from the public security department. The words came from other departments such as science and technology, personnel, labor, and agriculture. If they really came from these departments, you can imagine the bad intentions and the malicious intent of disparaging the public security department. To put it bluntly, this is the result of being extremely irresponsible, not having any sense of the overall situation, having the concept of the small situation at work, and having a weak legal awareness.

Let’s talk about “Optical fiber has no copper, so stealing is useless”. From a semantic point of view, it can be understood that its original intention is good, but it is also suspected of misleading the public. The sentence “Optical fiber has no copper” I really don’t see any problem with that, and it is also true, but there is a big problem with "stealing is useless". The implication is "I allow you to steal, but you can't sell it for money." You tell the thief "There is no copper in optical fiber", but the thief may not know whether there is "aluminum". Aluminum can also be sold for money, so why not try his luck? Thinking about it again, this sentence is "It's useless to steal optical fiber, because there is no copper. You'd better steal the copper, which can be sold for money." We fixed this sentence as being from the hands of a telecommunications company. We are imagining Are telecommunications companies inciting thieves to steal power lines, especially those with copper which are more valuable? We cannot forgive this kind of pure "illiteracy + legal illiteracy".