Talk about persuading others to die.

China's wine culture has a long history. At the wine table, not drinking will be considered unsociable. If you drink, you may get drunk. Drink without driving, drive without drinking. If you are drunk, there may be problems. A woman received a phone call, and the other party told her that her husband was drunk and the woman ignored him. By the wee hours, the drunk was dead. Personally, I think people who drink alcohol are more responsible.

First, drinkers have an unshirkable responsibility for the death of men.

Don't give up drinking, the result of giving up may be the end of a drunk. The man's wife felt that although her husband was a generous man, he would not have died if these people had not advised him to drink. Moreover, when he was sent to the hospital for emergency treatment, he found that her husband died of vomiting and suffocation after being drunk. The woman thinks that if it were not for the persuasion of these people, her husband would not have such a problem.

The person who advised the drinker felt that he was not wrong. In our custom, it is disrespectful to others to drink badly. Besides, there is only a little persuasion, not much. I didn't send the drunken man home because I knew I couldn't drive after drinking. This is a respect for customs and laws.

If you say you are wrong, it is even more ridiculous for women. Call her at noon and ask her to pick someone up. She didn't arrive until the wee hours. For whatever reason, women should also be responsible for the death of drunken men. If she hadn't been late, the drunk wouldn't have died. What these people say is a bit unreasonable.

Women have no obligation to pick up people. There are marital obligations between a woman and her husband. If a woman needs to work late into the night, does this responsibility belong to her? According to this statement, aren't women's obligations infinitely extended? The drinker said this just to ease his guilt. When you try to persuade wine, you should expect such consequences.

If there is no expectation, then you should not leave a drunk man in the car outside and leave him alone. Doing so is to let the drunk die, although they didn't mean to. I didn't go to see that man for such a long time from noon to early morning. This is dereliction of duty.

Some people will say that a drunk person is just drunk and can walk, which means there is nothing wrong with him. Teacher Luo Xiang once said, can a drunk person have independent capacity for civil conduct? From the legal point of view, a drunk person is a person with limited capacity. Therefore, what he says and does depends on the situation. We can't simply think that we should believe what he says.

People who advise people to drink should know this. If they don't know, then their approach is to let this happen and they should bear the corresponding consequences. Some people feel wronged for them and think that if this goes on, who will dare to persuade them to drink? What is the purpose of drinking? For friends. As long as you have feelings, everything you drink is wine! Therefore, it is wrong to persuade wine!

Second, people who advise people to drink should pay the price for their actions.

After drinking, there may be many problems. Whether it is walking unsteadily and falling, or lying on the road and being "picked up". We have seen many such things in the news. Therefore, people who advise wine must be cautious in advising wine. As the saying goes: drinking is risky, so be cautious in persuading people to drink.

If you are not careful, you may take some risks. The death of drunken men has something to do with drinkers. Some people who drank with them didn't persuade them to drink. Since there is no, people will not bear any consequences. The person who advised the drinker said that he drank it himself, and whether he should bear the main responsibility for his actions. Indeed, drunken people bear the main responsibility, as do drinkers and organizers.

Some people may think that if there is a problem with persuasion, they will still lose money. It was a terrible party because I persuaded myself to drink, which led to my property loss. Legally speaking, yes. There are four legal definitions of persuasion: forcing persuasion, persuading people knowing that they can't drink, failing to safely escort drunken people, and failing to discourage drunken drivers from causing damage.

In the case of the death of a drunken man, the drinker and the organizer violated Article 3, that is, they failed to escort the drunken man home safely. Accidents in this process, that is, the fault of these people, need to bear the responsibility. Some people say that if you know that the other person is drunk and there is a problem in escorting him to the hospital, is it also responsible? Is also responsible.

Some netizens asked, if he was safely escorted home, he died at home. Is this a problem for drinkers? You should also take some responsibility, because drunken people are not safe. The old custom of "drinking only when you are drunk" should have been abolished long ago. If there is something wrong with drinking too much, people who drink should bear the corresponding responsibilities and let these people learn a long lesson.

After trial, the court held that the drinker was responsible for 5% and the organizer was responsible for 10%. According to the local living standard, a ruling is made according to law, and the organizer needs to compensate 6.5438+0.2 million yuan for various losses caused by death, and the drinker needs to compensate 60,000 yuan. Other demands made by the deceased's wife were rejected. What happens in this case is more caused by persuasion.

If there were no drinkers' behavior, this would not have happened and there would not have been so many problems. It can be seen that these drinkers still don't understand the law. It doesn't matter if you don't know the law. You don't know the seriousness of the law yet. I only know that I did what I wanted to do, and I was punished by law. Although I didn't lose my personal freedom, I also lost a lot of money.

If you know the law, you should, like several others, not persuade people to drink. Don't brush short videos when you have nothing to do, read more books on law, or read more books, so as to enforce the law and understand the law. Even if you don't understand, you can ask others more to avoid breaking the law in your life and losing your money. As adults, communication is necessary, but ineffective communication is unnecessary.

Third, when socializing, you can't persuade people to drink.

Socialization means that if you live in this society, you need to communicate. The process of communication is also a process of enhancing understanding. In Celadon, (Wang) and Yan Ruoshui (Zhang Guoli) also have social activities. When they are together, they spend more time drinking tea and playing chess. Some people say that they are so elegant that ordinary people may not be able to do it.

Ordinary people don't have to drink when they socialize together. We can go out riding together, and middle-aged people can enjoy the surrounding scenery, exercise and make friends. Although it is only a friend on a trip, it is also a kind of fate. Everyone is a passer-by in other people's lives, right?

If you have to drink together, there is no need to drink big wine. Not to mention drinking! What is the purpose of drinking? Is it for fun? If it is, it is better to sing. Singing together can also enliven the atmosphere. Some people say that singing is out of tune, what should I do? As long as the purpose of entertainment is achieved. As for singing well, it really doesn't matter that much.

If you drink, you should pay attention. You need to send each other home safely. You must let the other family accept it, and see that he is safe and sound, and the other family agrees, before you leave. In this way, it can be regarded as a process of drinking wine. If one step is missing, there may be problems. After an accident, the other party's family is hurt, and he will feel guilty.

The best way is that since we are friends, a friendship between gentlemen is as light as water. All the guests are here. If you want to drink, no problem, please help yourself. No persuasion, no publicity. If something goes wrong, you have to bear it yourself. We are all adults, there is no need to come to those empty heads. Some people say, what about the fox who has met for thousands of years? Looking for Jiang Ziya. He can kill Kyubi no Youko Fox.

It's good to be happy and peaceful when everyone is together. Middle-aged people are the pillar of the family and can't move easily. If the pillar is moved, the family may collapse. So, if you have to go to a restaurant, this is the principle, don't drink. If you must drink, don't get drunk. If there is a drinker, remember him. If something happens, he will never escape. Some people say that this is not hatred of the rich? Since these people want the beams of your house to collapse, is his heart good?

In the adult world, there is no such word as easy. There is a big mountain on everyone's back, and some are still two. Therefore, a happy life is a kind of happiness. Whoever tries to break this happiness will be miserable. Some people say that in this case, the relationship is broken. If it's broken, it's broken Anyone can live without it. What do you think of this? Welcome everyone to leave a message and discuss together!