Looking for a debate speech for a debate competition!

Computers will/will not replace books

Chairman: Zhang Zequn

Pro: The University of Hong Kong computers will definitely replace books

Con: Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Computers will not replace books

Chairman: Hello friends! Welcome to the ’99 International College Debate. Today is the third preliminary round of Group A, and the audience is also welcome. Friends, in the final analysis, debate is a competition of wisdom. Some people vividly compare it to mental gymnastics. However, it seems that the speed of our ideological development is slightly slower than the speed of material development. In the past, we usually used the known to deduce the unknown. For example, Mendeleev used the rules of the periodic table of elements he discovered to deduce three unknown elements. But now in many aspects, it seems difficult for humans to use the known to deduce the unknown. When deriving unknowns, such as computers, which thinker, philosopher, or computer expert can clearly foresee what changes computers will eventually bring to mankind? So a thinker reminds you not to let our human thoughts lag behind our actions. For example, if one day thoughts and actions are truly separated, human beings will lose their wisdom. So in order not to lose our wisdom) I would like to ask my friends to do more ideological gymnastics, pay more attention to and participate in our debate competition. Now let me introduce to you the debaters from both sides participating today: (omitted) Now we solemnly introduce to you the seven judges on our judging panel: (omitted) The guest commentators for this competition are: (omitted) Friends, just now I said that it is difficult for experts to foresee the changes that computers will eventually bring to mankind. This is because the development speed of computers really exceeds the imagination of our human brains. We can also imagine that just a few decades ago, the inventors of computers, could they imagine what electronic books were like? But today, can’t we read them online at will? By analogy, how many years from now will computers be able to replace books? This is a forward-looking question and a controversial topic. We might as well debate this today. According to the results of the pre-match draw, the position held by the affirmative side, the University of Hong Kong, is that computers will definitely replace books; the position held by the opposing side, Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, is that computers will not replace books. Next, we will enter the stage of stating the argument. First, we will ask Li Weijian, the first defender of the affirmative, to speak for 3 minutes. please!

The first argument of the affirmative: Chairman, judges, hello everyone! The 20th century is the age of knowledge. What we want to prove is: computers must replace books. Computers include software and hardware, which have excellent functions such as analysis, storage and dissemination of data, multimedia, artificial intelligence and Internet access, while books - according to the definition of "Chinese Dictionary", are mountains of bound works. Preserving and disseminating knowledge is the main function of books, and ttL is one of the functions of computers. So computers and books overlap in function. And substitution means to exclude others or other things and occupy their position. When we talk about replacement, we mean functional replacement. But please note that replacement does not mean eradication, but it necessarily means that under certain conditions, something will happen. What are these conditions? At the level of tool replacement, it means superiority and popularization, that is, when human beings use daily tools, they will definitely choose a tool that is more convenient, more functional, and more superior. When most people adopt this tool, it will become popular and eventually replace the old tool. We use electric lights to replace candles as our daily lighting tools. Isn’t this a good example? What is the pseudo-advantage of computers over books? Books are a medium that relies on words and pictures to spread and preserve knowledge. In addition to the basic functions of books, computers have the advantages of processing information more, faster, wider and more cost-effectively.

More means that computers use less space to store more information than books. Multimedia equipment integrates viewing, listening, reading and other functions, which greatly enhances the fun of learning; fast means that computer input, Modification, transmission and query are fast, and readers can read works from all over the world on the Internet in a timely manner; wide means extensive, and computers have a wide range of uses and dissemination, and information can be spread all over the world in a blink of an eye; provincial means saving, and computers do not need to be used A lot of time for information transfer. The so-called knowledge is power. In this era of knowledge explosion, earlier acquisition of knowledge often means technological and economic superiority. So why do we talk about the popularization of computers? We know that various countries are now paying attention to the promotion of computers. From national institutions to every household, we can see traces of computers. But now the price of computers is more expensive than books, but what we say is "definitely"! That is, with the continuous advancement of science and technology in the future, the popularization of computers is an inevitable trend, and computers will certainly devour the book market in the future, eventually replacing the function of books in the dissemination of knowledge. In the history of human tools, there are many examples of advanced replacing backward tools. However, backward tools prevent us from keeping up with the times. Therefore, for the development of the country and economic prosperity, we firmly believe that it is an inevitable trend for computers to replace books. Thanks! (Applause)

2007-4-21 16:29 Reply

58.252.80.* 2nd Floor

Chairman: Thank you, classmate Li Weijian! Now let’s ask the opposing side, Zhao Yiwen, to state his point of view. The time is also 3 minutes. please!

Opposite argument: Thank you, Chairman! Dear guests, hello everyone! The development of computers has indeed brought many advantages, but there are also many problems! This is the limitation of computers! This is common sense! But the opponent’s fellow debater didn’t mention it at all. If you don’t face it, will it cease to exist? Ask the opponent’s fellow debater to explain it to everyone later. The logic of the other debater just now can be summarized as books are only carriers of information, and so are computers, and can carry more; books can spread knowledge, and so can computers. And the transmission speed is faster, but can these similarities between computers and books be the reason why computers will definitely replace books? "Bijiang" means inevitable will and will, which refers to the unshakable certainty in matters. But what the opposing debater talks about from the beginning to the end is how good the trend is and how likely it is, but neither the trend nor the possibility means that it is certain in theory! Therefore, this replacement is theoretically uncertain, impossible with computer technology, and unfeasible in terms of its actual operation. First, the truth is not certain. Not every item has a reason to replace the original item just because there are advanced substitutes. Instead, specific issues need to be analyzed in detail. Sewing machines are an example. Electric sewing machines are high-speed and fast, and pocket sewing machines are easy to use. But have humans’ original sewing needles and threads been replaced? Or "will" replace it? No, the thread and various sewing machines in the hands of a loving mother will surely live peacefully in modern society. Similarly, the high speed of computers is not the reason why they will inevitably replace books. They can exist in the future society just like sewing machines and needlework. The term "replacement" is not certain. Second, it is technically impossible. Computers have their new limitations, the infamous computer virus. In 1999, Melissa, Chernobyl, and Elz shrunk into three major viruses, which repeatedly attacked computers around the world. On April 26 alone, 60 million computers were paralyzed! Computer viruses are hard to guard against. As the saying goes, the devil is as high as the road. Will computer viruses inevitably disappear when computers replace books? How do the opposing debaters view this inevitability? If computer viruses still exist, how can we be sure that computers will replace books? Third, the real operation of computers replacing books is not feasible. The other debater said that computers are more convenient than books, so computers will "certainly" replace books. But does it mean that something will be replaced just because it is convenient? Quartz watches are more convenient and accurate than mechanical watches, and are of high quality and low price. But have mechanical watches been replaced? Today, the vitality of mechanical watches has doubled, and the market price has risen steadily. It can be seen that it is difficult to deduce the necessity of replacement just from the word "convenience". because. It is not a matter of fact.

In the face of what should not be, is not possible, and is not feasible, how can we start talking about inevitable replacement? Thanks! (Applause)

Chairman: Thank you, classmate Zhao Yiwen! The next thing to enter is the dialogue of free people. During this time, free people can speak or not. First, let’s seek the opinions of the free men on both sides...Okay, I want to speak. First of all, I would like to invite the free people from the opposing side to speak, please!

Anti-liberal people: When talking about replacement, we must clarify the prerequisites. If you want to replace me, the first condition is that you have all my functions. If you don't, how can you replace me? The second is that I also have your shortcomings. You are full of shortcomings and I don’t have any. Why do you want to replace me?

Zheng Liren: In the future world, computers will definitely replace books, but the other classmate was vague about our position and ignored that this is a forward-looking issue. After listening to it for so long, the other students all said "no" instead of "no". Let me tell you, "no" refers to the current situation. Just because I am not someone else's wife now does not mean that I will never be someone else's wife in the future! (Applause) Okay, let's take a look at today's trends! If it were not a general trend, why would Raffles College in your country encourage students to stay at home for a week when the semester started in June this year, completely breaking away from books and using computers to study? If it is not a general trend, why do your country's Overseas Chinese Middle School and Raffles Girls' High School encourage students to bring laptops to class and use computers as books? If it is not a general trend, why does your country's education policy hope to promote the popularization of computers? Could it be that the other classmate turned a blind eye to all this? Thanks! (Applause)

Chairman: Now we are going to enter the cross-examination session. First, the second debater from the opposing side is asked to ask questions to the first, second, and third debaters from the affirmative side one by one. please!

Second argument of the opposing party: I would like to ask the other party’s first argument, can all the functions of books be replaced by computers? If not, are those still books?

The first argument of the affirmative: My fellow student, what we are talking about today is the main function of books. The function of books is to transfer and preserve knowledge, but computers can do a better job than books! What we are talking about today is the main function and not other functions. My fellow student, please understand this, thank you!

2007-4-21 16:29 Reply

58.252.80.* 3rd Floor

The second argument of the opponent: The second argument of the opponent, if the computer is just If they replace some books, does that mean that computers and books will definitely exist in the future society?

The second argument of the affirmative: Since the other party admits that computers and books now coexist, if given a little more time in the future, it will be appropriate for computers to replace books. In addition, I would like to add one more point. Just now you said that the main function is not other functions, but you did not say what function it is. Why didn't you speak out? Please tell us clearly when you have the chance. If computers are superior to books in disseminating and preserving knowledge, why can't computers replace books? Ask the other classmate to demonstrate.

The second argument of the opposing side: the third argument of the opposing side. The Bible is also a book. How can I replace it with this book?

The third argument of the affirmative: Sorry, fellow student, we know that there is also an electronic version of the Bible now! What's more, today's "Bible" is no longer just a simple tool for preservation and transmission media, it is a religious tool! My fellow student, our position is that according to the laws of tool development, tools must replace backward tools with the same purpose. Inevitability can be achieved as long as two conditions are met, that is, the first is superiority, and the second is universalization. But the other classmate has not said why computers cannot, cannot, or cannot replace books. Thanks! (Applause)

The second argument of the affirmative: the second argument of the opponent, the tool must have its main function. What is the main function of the book?

What is the main function of the book?

Second argument from the opposing side: Of course, the main function of books is to convey information as the other party said, but the functions of books vary depending on the information.

Today, some books convey information about Chinese and mathematics, and some books convey information about art! The opposing debater must not generalize!

The second argument of the affirmative: The first argument of the other side, do you know how many times the sales volume of private computers in mainland China increased from 1991 to 1997?

Opposition debate: The opponent’s fellow debaters are telling us about trends, but we think this issue is very complicated. Why? Because the amount of information on computers is increasing, the amount of books published is also increasing. Some books are only published in books but not in electronic versions, and nothing can replace them; while some things are only published online, and we don’t know whether they were originally intended to be published in books, or whether they have nothing to do with books. There is also a kind of book that publishes both a book and an electronic version. It is possible to have both. It is impossible to say which one will replace the other. Thanks! (Applause)

The second argument of the affirmative: The third argument of the other side. You may not know the national conditions of mainland China, but do you know?

What was the penetration rate of personal computers in your country in 1996? ?

Three opposing arguments: Of course, the computer penetration rate in Singapore is increasing year by year, but we do know that more and more Singaporean citizens are borrowing books from the library. Why? Because no one has seen the trend of computers replacing books at all! The opposing debater argued that computers will definitely replace books, and they must meet two prerequisites. The first is that computers must have all the functions of books. If they don't have all the functions, how can we replace them? Second, computers must also have the shortcomings of books. If you want to replace me, I don’t have any of your shortcomings. Why should you replace me? Thanks!

Chairman: The following is a summary of the cross-examination. First, I would like to invite Xiao Zhen, the second debater from the opposing side, to speak. The time is 1 minute and 30 seconds, please!

The second argument of the opposing side: Not all book information can be replaced by computers. This is what the other side is trying to tell us in the first argument. So we can only assume that computers and books will definitely exist in the future society. It would have been better for the other side to argue for the second time and tell us that we would just keep it for today. What I'm curious about is, why do you call the deposit a replacement after it has already been saved? If today's existence is called replacement, then why are we still sitting here talking about its inevitable replacement? If computers will definitely replace books, then take a look at the Bible, one of the most widely circulated books in the world! The Bible is a carrier of written information in the words of the other party Sanbian, but don’t forget that the Bible also carries invisible information, that is, holiness and solemnity. This is also a kind of information! Fellow debater, if every believer in the church holds a computer and sings hymns, it would really be a sight. Even if you get used to it, you'll get used to it, but when Western courts have to press the Bible with their hands to swear oaths, how can this Bible be replaced? This is a legal procedure! Is the other debater planning to press the computer screen with his hand? It seems that in order to replace books, even the law has to be changed for you. If even the Bible, which has such a huge circulation, cannot replace it, then who else can believe that computers will replace books? If you still say that it will be replaced, what’s the point? Thanks! (Applause)

Chairman: Thank you, classmate Xiao Zhen! Next, I would like to ask Huang Aijing, the second defender of the affirmative, to give a summary of the cross-examination. The time is also 1 minute and 30 seconds.

please!

2007-4-21 16:29 Reply

58.252.80.* 4th Floor

Second defense of the affirmative: The other party has admitted the most important purpose of the book That is to store and disseminate knowledge, which computers can also do! But do you know how many, fast, cost-effective and wide-ranging advantages it has? A chip the size of a fingernail can store two years' worth of People's Daily, and one CD can store the contents of an encyclopedia! The other party was not able to answer me just now about the growth rate of private computers in mainland China from 1991 to 1997. I tell you it was 35 times! From tens of thousands of units to 3.5 million units, isn’t this a big trend? Then the other classmate also failed to tell me what the penetration rate of personal computers in Singapore is. Let me tell you, it has increased in the past few years from 1991 to 1996. Computers have many, fast, economical and wide advantages. Why? Will it not replace books in the future? Thanks! (Applause)

Chairman: Thank you, Huang Aijing! What we are about to enter next is a dialogue between free people on both sides. The total time is two minutes each, but each speech must not exceed 30 seconds. First of all, I would like to invite the free agent Shi Qing from the square to speak, please!

Zheng Liren: The other classmate, from the first debate to the second debate, I still heard the other classmate keep saying how is it now, how is it now, then please tell us why the computer can't work , impossible, will not replace books?

Anti-freedom people: Because computers have limitations today, they will have limitations tomorrow, and they will also have limitations in the future. This limitation will always exist, which determines that computers will never replace books.

Zheng Liren: My fellow student, all tools have limitations. Do you want to take the plane flying in the sky and sail it on the sea? Then I want to ask the other student, what is the ultimate purpose of the book?

Anti-liberal people: Of course books are meant to convey information. We also know that tools cannot be perfect, so although computers are not perfect today, we do not demand that computers be extinct. But books are used well by everyone today. Why does the other debater insist that they have to work hard with computers and replace them? (Applause)

Free man: My fellow student, the replacement we are talking about is in the future! Our fellow debaters have made it very clear that what we are talking about is the law of a tool. As long as it has a superiority, computers and books coexist now, but we can see the superiority of computers. When most people are using this tool, it will become popular in the future. Once popularized, computers will replace books! I would like to ask the other classmate, you are wearing clothes made of cloth today, why don’t you wear clothes made of straw? If what you said has not replaced the tool, please answer my question. Thanks!

Anti-liberal people: Because when it comes to clothes, cloth has all the advantages, but grass does not

have all the advantages. So of course cloth is going to replace grass, but I want to ask you, what are the prerequisites for your replacement?

Zhengyiren: The replacement standards we are talking about have been mentioned many times, and this is the second time I am telling everyone. We told you about the rules of tools at the beginning. Substitution must fulfill two necessary conditions, namely superiority and popularization.

We have made it very clear, haven’t the other students heard it yet? Please answer me, do you use electric lights or candles to read now?

Anti-freedom man: Then let’s see if computers have this superiority! Computers themselves are full of problems today, including viruses and hackers. How come they are so superior?

Zheng Liren: The other student, you always talk about viruses, viruses, then let me tell you: cars are also dangerous! The number of people who die under cars every year is expected to exceed the number of people who died in World War II by the year 2000! My fellow student, do you think we have to destroy all the cars? My fellow student, don’t you admit that this is the evolution of tools? (Applause)

Anti-freedom man: Then what do you think will be used to replace cars? Are you going to replace your car with an airplane today? We have never abandoned computers. Today we just say that computers have their own shortcomings and books are not perfect. Both can perform their respective duties and function in modern society and future society. Although computers and books each have their own advantages and disadvantages, why don't we let them play their respective functions and survive in the future society? Why do we have to let computers and books compete with each other? Books and computers have their own advantages in transmitting information. They can complement each other and perform their own duties. For example, books for the blind are also books and rely on touch. How can computers replace them? So today we say that computers and books will definitely be in the future society. Fellow debaters on the other side, please don’t only see the advantages of the computer itself, but fail to see the functions of the book itself! Thanks!

Chairman: Thank you, free men on both sides! The next step is to enter the free debate session. First, please ask the positive side to ask questions.

Second argument from the affirmative: You just said that blind people cannot read computers. Did you know that computers can read to blind people? Isn't this better?

2007-4-21 16:29 Reply

58.252.80.* 5th Floor

The second argument of the negative side: Very good! Fellow debaters on the other side, we also hope that blind friends can have one more tool, but why do we have to get rid of the old one when we get the new one? Do you still need to learn Braille?

Three arguments for the affirmative: Could it be that the books mentioned by the other student, besides the Bible, are Braille - books used by blind people? So what are the other books? I told Twice, isn't this a trend? My fellow student, why are you avoiding answering? In addition, the other student said that he wanted to replace them, and that he wanted to completely replace them. As we just said, replacement does not mean eradication! We asked, are the clothes you are wearing now hand-sewn by your mother? Of course not, it was made by a machine! Why can’t the other classmate see this coexistence! So where are the main functions? The main function is to spread knowledge! Spread knowledge electronically

The other classmate, that is the media and carrier of knowledge! Please ask the other student to answer us, why can’t computers and won’t replace books?

Three opposing arguments: If the other party cannot even give an answer to replace a book with a huge circulation like the Bible, who can still believe that computers will definitely replace books? We say that to learn Braille, you must have a Braille textbook. I would like to ask my fellow debater, how do you replace the Braille textbook?

Second argument: Didn’t the car coexist with the rickshaw when it was invented? Let me ask my fellow debater, are the rickshaws or cars you see on the street now?

The opposing side argued: The opponent’s fellow debater said that was possible! We know what the opponent’s fellow debater means, which is that there is no need to issue government white papers now, and we can instead issue white papers. (Applause) What about yellow papers and blue papers? How about changing them to computers with yellow leather and blue leather? The whole colorful Apple computer! (Applause)

Three arguments for the affirmative: I'm sorry, fellow student, the annual reports of the US government and the Hong Kong government have been published online, and many professors at the University of Hong Kong have stored their knowledge notes online. Students can pick them up by themselves. Come down and see.

I would like to ask the free agent of the other party, she just said that if she wants to replace it, she must replace all its shortcomings. So if the "Titanic" sank, does that mean that all future ships will also sink?

Second argument from the negative side: I’m sorry, but now you ask our free agent, how will she answer you! Please answer our questions! What do you want to replace the books that cannot be replaced? To replace it? Or can't it be replaced?

The first argument of the affirmative: The other student, you said that there are many problems with computers nowadays, including viruses and hackers, but did you know that there are also bookworms in books? If there are more people like Qin Shihuang who come out to burn books and harass Confucians, then what is the meaning of the existence of books? Second counter argument: The bookworm problem has been solved long ago. Please note again, fellow debaters on the other side, if Qin Shihuang was still here today and wanted to burn books, he would have to have a big project! But one hacker can bring down thousands of computers! (Applause)

The third argument of the affirmative: Then you also need a computer to access the Internet! I want to tell the other student, you said that as long as everyone has their own strengths, there is no way to replace them, but we have told everyone that as long as there is superiority and popularization of work, computers will definitely replace books.

Three arguments against the opponent: Then we have to look at the superiority of the other party. One point they put forward is that there is more storage and large capacity. Does large capacity mean it will be replaced? The kettle has a larger capacity than the water cup. Could it be that the other student will drink from the kettle instead of the water cup? (Laughter, applause)

Second debate from the affirmative: My opponent, please stop changing your concept here! How fast, how

How big is the population? Let me tell you, this CD can replace the contents of an encyclopedia, which is dozens of thick books. Do you think this is an advantage?

The opposing side argued: Okay, the opponent’s fellow debater mentioned fast again, so let’s take a look at fast! Running is faster than walking, so you can’t just run for everything! (Applause)

The first argument from the affirmative: How do you prove that running is superior to walking?

Second argument from the negative side: In this regard, you have not proved that running will make you tired, and that computers that can be used will have viruses!

Second argument from the affirmative: Our free agent has just said that accidents will happen when we ride in a car. Shouldn't we stop taking cars? My friend, how did you get from Singapore to Beijing? Opposition 2: Of course you should use good tools! Books have their advantages, and computers also have their advantages. Each can do its best, perform its duties, and work together peacefully. It is not a replacement. (Applause)

The third argument of the affirmative: So I would like to ask the other student, what functions of books can’t be replaced by computers?

Three objections: After talking for so long, the other party can’t even explain the functions of books. No wonder they can’t see a reason why they won’t replace them. Then I would like to ask my fellow debater, how do you replace the legal Bible?

The third argument of the affirmative: So, fellow student, is the book you are talking about today the Bible?

2007-4-21 16:29 Reply

58.252.80.* 6th Floor

The first argument of the opposing side: an example of the other side arguing with the Bible If you can't solve it, you still need to talk to us about other things! I would like to ask my fellow debater, how can I replace that Bible?

Advocate: Friend of the other side, let me tell you that an electronic Bible has been published now. Doesn’t this tell everyone about the popularization of computers?

Second debate from the opposing side: Does popularization mean replacement? Did the publisher of electronic Bibles say that they would collect all book Bibles?

Second debate for the affirmative: Friend the other debater, today’s proposition is “must be”, so if there is this trend now and electronic Bibles have appeared, why won’t handheld computers become our books tomorrow? Woolen cloth?

Three opposing arguments: Does the possible trend equal the inevitable result? Today the stock price on the Shanghai Stock Exchange is 1,000 points, and tomorrow it is 2,000 points. Will it break through 10,000 points the day after tomorrow? (Applause)

The third argument of the affirmative: Please don’t misunderstand the other student.

What we are talking about is a law, not a simple trend. The rule is that as long as there is superiority and popularization in the process of tool development, new tools will replace existing tools for the same purpose. Please ask the other student not to avoid the problem. I would like to ask why it is impossible, cannot and will not be possible for computers to replace books?

Opposition debate: The other side’s debate friends like to talk about “definitely”, so let’s talk about it. If the opponent’s future is one year, we will soon encounter a millennium bug. If it is ten thousand years, then I’m afraid there will be a ten thousand year bug waiting for us!

Fang Fang Third debate: The other student’s problem is that there is no inevitability unless there are exceptions! But the exception is just because it is an exception, not the rule! Should our starting point in daily life be exceptions or the rule? Shouldn’t the other student avoid the problem? ! Have candles been replaced by electric lights?

Second argument: First, I talked about the rules to the other student, but I was skeptical about the limitations of the computer, but the other party insisted that the computer must be correct. Better than books. The other debater also said that we only talk about the Bible, but you can’t give an example. We don’t dare to give more examples! If you have to give one, let’s give another one. The art of calligraphy is also conveyed in books. , how can the position of books be replaced in the art of calligraphy? (Applause)

Answer: The other student keeps talking about the current problems, what are the restrictions and what are the problems? . But what we are saying is that it will definitely happen! My friend, are you opposed to the fact that tools will definitely enter this trend, or do you simply have no confidence in technological progress?

My friend, How can we talk about the future if we can’t even solve the current problems! Let me ask my fellow debater, how will the position of calligraphy be replaced?

Second debate: Could it be that the art of calligraphy will be replaced? If we can’t solve the current problem, why don’t we stop developing it? My friend, your school is also actively promoting computerization! Did you know that Nanyang Technological University has the largest campus network and campus automation system in Southeast Asia?

Another argument: Let me tell you another piece of news: Nanyang Technological University also has the largest bookstore in Southeast Asia! There are long queues of people in the bookstore every day! No one told the students of Nanyang Technological University that computers will definitely replace them. Books! (Applause)

Second debate: The other student told us that if we have the largest library, can’t computers replace books? But why should we develop computerization? This is because of competitiveness. Having knowledge and confidence is power. Computers can give us faster, more and broader information. My fellow students, we also want to build a cyberport in Hong Kong. Why? We don’t want to fall behind others and be eliminated by them in the future. !

Second argument: So! Computers and books are so great! Why should we give up books? (How can books be replaced in the art of calligraphy? Time's up)

Three arguments for the positive side: Calligraphy is about the Internet, and the other party's classmate, and the two are coexisting!

Can you have it to the point where you can be a computer? If it is popularized to a certain extent, it will inevitably replace books as the main media.

Three objections: Can you appreciate calligraphy through a computer, but can you practice calligraphy without drawing? Then I am afraid that only Li Ka-shing can become a calligrapher! Because his copybooks must be laid out one by one, and they must not be accumulated into a mountain!

Another argument: On the 15th of this month, "China Youth Daily" reported that the recording of BU2000 Tan Jian (transliteration) came out again, and all Microsoft operating systems fell to the ground. Excuse me, Microsoft, which accounts for the majority of the market share, has fallen to the ground. Why do you still want to wash your hands of the book?

Second argument from the opposing side: In fact, not everyone only swears by the "Bible", there are also people who swear by the "Quran". If the other party also replaces the "Buddhist Sutra" Okay, then the other party's computer really dominates the world!

Chairman: Thank you to the three debaters from both sides! Now it’s time for the free man to speak for the second time.

According to the last time used, the free men of both sides now have 38 seconds and 1 minute and 11 seconds respectively. First of all, I would like to invite Mr. Shi Qing, a free agent from the square, to speak. please!

2007-4-21 16:29 Reply

58.252.80.* 7th Floor

Free man: The flow of time is endless. We all know that oral tradition was passed down 5,000 years ago, but it was eventually replaced by paper invented by Cai Lun! We have now entered an era of knowledge explosion, and people are becoming more and more demanding on knowledge. We often want to obtain the fastest and most extensive knowledge in the shortest time. So we can see that the book has reached its weakness. . . . . .