Road construction in the village. Let's talk about sewage treatment or road construction first.

If there is only a sum of money in the village, water treatment and road construction can only be completed.

Okay, then. Water treatment represents health, road construction represents wealth, villages represent collectives, and voting represents individuals. I am not an individual in this group, and I am not qualified to write down my personal decision. However, I don't advocate that all villagers vote to solve this problem. I don't want to see something like' I have to finish the date with tears in my eyes'.

This is very complicated. There are contradictions between individuals and collectives, between individuals, between minority and majority, between health and wealth, between freedom and democracy, between government and people, and between present and future people. When the final decision appears, these contradictions will be more or less reflected.

Think about what we did when we encountered similar problems before. The delegates raised their hands and the government made the final decision. We should reflect on whether this represents the interests of the broad masses of the people. If it really represents, should the interests of the minority be considered? Is there a better solution and so on.

This is not a simple question, the questioner is above me, admire! ! !

All of the above are my personal reinterpretation of this passage you wrote. Literally speaking, it is to build roads. Is this the' sewage' from the previous pavement or the subgrade water storage? Then what's there to ask? Find out who did this project, ask him and see if you can build a road on the water. If so, then this question is really a failure; If not, it is suggested that the layout of the statement is reasonable.