The kindergarten responded that the child's death while crawling to sleep had nothing to do with it. The teacher did not neglect his duty. Is the teacher responsible?

Children’s safety accidents have attracted more and more attention. Compared with now, conditions are better, and children are the treasures of the family. A 4-year-old child in Hunan died during a nap in a kindergarten, which attracted everyone's attention. The kindergarten responded that the child's death had nothing to do with the child crawling to sleep and that the teacher was not negligent in his duties. This aroused everyone's dissatisfaction. The child's death in the kindergarten actually had nothing to do with the school? What is the logic of this? I have thought about it for a long time, and I want to share my thoughts and opinions. I hope it will be helpful to everyone.

1. What is the focus of debate between kindergartens and parents.

From the published video, we can see that the teacher and classmates did not cause any contact harm to the child. We can rule out human-caused death of the child. The next important point is that children sleep on their stomachs. For children, sleeping on their stomachs is indeed a bit harmful. Especially children under 2 years old are prone to breathing difficulties when sleeping on their stomachs, but for children over 3 years old, sleeping on their stomachs is very dangerous. Children sleeping on their stomachs will basically not affect their breathing, so the kindergarten believes that death does not have much to do with sleeping on their stomachs. However, parents believe that the real cause of death is breathing problems caused by children sleeping on their stomachs. This is a focus of debate between the kindergarten and teachers.

2. Are there any abnormalities on the day the child goes to school?

We learned from the parents that the child caught a cold the first day and had some physical problems, but it was not serious, so the parents sent the child to the kindergarten and told the teacher about the child's condition that day. When the child got up, the teacher called him twice but the child did not get up. When he called for the third time, he discovered an accident and immediately sent him to the hospital. As a result, he was no longer breathing. The child's death may be related to illness. This is from the kindergarten. From this point of view, the kindergarten recommends that parents defend their rights through litigation. It seems that the kindergarten is fully confident that it is not responsible for the death of the child.

3. Is the teacher responsible for the death of a child?

I personally think that the teacher's responsibility is very small. After all, the teacher's performance was relatively reasonable and compliant during the whole process. The only problem was that the problem was discovered only when the child was called for the third time. If the teacher called the child for the third time, I believe that teachers have no responsibility at all if they can find problems in their children. I personally think that the most important thing is to see if the child has any disease. If the child has congenital disease, the teacher should not be responsible. Otherwise, the teacher is still a little negligent. After all, the child died in the kindergarten.