Advantages and disadvantages of children learning Go.

Don't let children learn Go casually. Most interest classes are necessary, not for anything else, just to let children have a good hobby to accompany them for life. Of course, going is cruel and boring. The following is never to let children learn Go casually.

Don't let children learn Go 1, it takes too much time.

This is one of the pain points in the introduction of Go. People who are aware of this problem, through small chessboards and simplified rules, reduce the time needed to play chess in the introduction of Go, so that children can learn more about Go in less time. However, with the improvement of chess skills, it still takes a lot of time to play a high-quality chess game.

Long-term study needs a lot of money.

If you plan to learn Go for a long time, you should not only have enough time, but also measure your family's financial ability first. Generally, the cost of a Go class is not lower than that of special training courses such as Olympiad English.

If a child learns Weiqi until he is around 65,438+00 years old, it is necessary to consider whether to continue his amateur or professional career. Taking the road of professional chess players will mean more family expenses, even the whole family will stop school and concentrate on cultivating their children's professional Go. I hope that children can realize their dreams through Go and even earn money to support their families. However, once the career path is blocked, the blow to children and families will be heavy.

Too stiff and indifferent

Because of the cultivation of comprehensive thinking and "overall situation" consciousness, children will always think from different angles and even be too cautious in some aspects when they encounter any problems after learning Go. Furthermore, Go must be divided into winners and losers.

But also requires "winning without arrogance and losing with grace." After many competitions, such maturity will suppress children's desire to express joy in nature to a certain extent, and will be more indifferent than other children after forming habits. Of course, this is not a "disadvantage".

The benefits of learning have gone.

1, Go is a good game to develop intelligence, brain-strengthening gymnastics. It is a good exercise for mathematics, logic and spatial ability, and most Go players have high IQ.

2. Go activities can cultivate temperament and exercise people's concentration. Go is an elegant activity. In the game, be polite, respect your opponent, win without arrogance, and lose with grace.

3. Weiqi culture is profound, with a long history and endless changes. It contains many truths of China culture and China philosophy. After learning chess for a long time, you will learn a lot about life.

Don't let children learn Go 2 1 casually. It's expensive to learn Go for a long time, so it's not cost-effective as a specialty. It is also the dilemma of professional players.

My family belongs to the ordinary working class. At first, the tuition fee for one class a week was ok, but soon, with the frequency of classes on Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays and Saturdays (semi-majors), the tuition fee for Go class was far higher than that for math schools and English classes. That was more than 20 years ago, and now I don't understand the market.

But at that time, all the money at home was spent on my extracurricular classes. When I grow up, I put "the growth rate of my earning power must exceed the aging of my parents multiplied by the inflation rate" in the first place, because my parents have no savings at all and have not made any real estate investment to train me. I feel very guilty.

When children reach the ages of 10 and 1 1, they will face the choice of continuing their spare-time life or joining the national youth team. If you become a professional player, it means more expensive tuition and giving up your studies-professional players, like athletes, mainly play chess, supplemented by going to school. An athlete can't have a culture class on the ground from 7 am to 5 pm every day, and neither of them can go.

I stopped playing chess in the fifth grade of primary school. At that time, my parents gave me a choice between playing chess and going to school. First of all, at that time, I knew very well that I didn't like Go very much, and I wasn't very talented (I knew I wasn't cut out for this material after seeing the understanding and growth speed of world champions); Secondly, I prefer reading.

I hope to keep reading PhD and doing academic research; In the end, I am more realistic. There is only one champion in competitive sports. I have always been second in so many competitions, because I don't have the psychological quality to win the championship, and there are so many choices in life. I hope to pursue a valuable and interesting career, but I don't have to compete for the first place.

Some of my Go classmates have chosen to be professional players, especially some girls who choose to be professional players. It's really courageous. After all, the ratio of men to women in this industry is too wide. In my Go class, the ratio of male to female is 10: 1.

There are only one or two world champions in the end, and they don't earn much. The rest are sparring partners, teachers and commentators. Go is not very ornamental, and it is not very popular internationally. If you don't really love it, playing chess is really bad in such a material society.

The classification of Go in China belongs to sports. When I went to school more than ten years ago, I felt that the gold content of being a special student was like a piano. The market is unknown now. This is also something parents should consider.

2. The rigorous thinking of Go training makes people afraid to try and explore.

I wonder if this has anything to do with family education. Our family is relatively conservative and cautious. I hope to think it over before doing it. This makes it impossible for me to explore my interest "irresponsibly" for a long time, but more likely to be too responsible and pay too much attention to whether it is "useful".

But maybe it has nothing to do with Go, but with personal character/family environment? I have never rebelled since I was a child (I don't listen to my parents, but I am very precocious and know how to take care of the consequences), and I just released myself recently.

3. Too cold/vanity plummets

"Win without arrogance, lose with grace" is simply a big sentence I have heard since I was a child. Go is very good for a child, who can see someone on the ground one day behind the scenes. According to my limited observation, children in our Go class like to play better than themselves, which is challenging and interesting.

You can harvest yourself, and the sense of accomplishment that is obviously weaker than yourself is temporary. If you get used to it, it will be boring. Therefore, children who play chess always look forward and look at classmates and seniors who run faster than themselves. It is especially difficult to be blind and arrogant. Being angry is also very, very difficult.

But why do I say this is a potential "disadvantage"? Because the maturity and stability of "winning without arrogance and losing with grace" will suppress the joy of winning screams in children's nature to a certain extent, and gradually form a habit. They will be reluctant/not good at expressing the small vanity and luck of an ordinary person, and it is easy for others to think that "this person has no expression", "this person is so serious" and "this person looks super pessimistic". In my body, it is really a dilemma that can't be expressed when I am crazy. As an adult, I need to learn how to be an angry child and how to channel positive and negative emotions.

The sample size I can observe is limited. It seems that some lively children are playing Go, but I have to admit that there is a certain conflict between the maturity brought by Go and the innocence brought by fun/creativity/artistic activities.

I remember when I was in junior high school, there were all kinds of chess competitions in my class, including Go, Chess, Gobang and Checkers. I am the only one who plays Go in our school (our definition is: none of the non-professional courses are called Go). I think playing chess with people who only know that their eyes can live is simply bullying others.

It's like a professional martial arts expert going to the vegetable market to fight with gangsters, and he refuses to participate (my terrible sense of honor). I don't mind at all that the champion of the Go group in my class is naturally another classmate. -But you're exaggerating it a little. A normal child has a chance to show his prowess.

I should be so happy that I don't want it How can I be so anonymous that even my classmates don't want to know that I can play Go? I think this is the story of a swordsman when a child enters a certain professional training in the process of growing up-ta loves his sword as much as his life and dignity, the best sword.

Indulge in the hottest blood, the best swordsman, the best opponent (here the voice-over in front of the protagonist in Gu Long's novel automatically appears).

Looking back when you grow up, you will observe that your weak vanity/blood level has dropped sharply after participating in competitive events. Quite simply, Go is not a demonstration game, but a duel game. Strength depends on hard strength, vanity is useless.

However, moderate vanity is also a kind of blood power (I think the relationship between vanity and blood is very similar to the protective effect of fear or anger on people, both of which are stimulating). People who don't have vanity are either compared with others or with themselves all day, especially tired and internally injured.

Is it necessary for children to learn Go?

Go really took a lot of time. If you want to learn chess well, it is necessary to play chess and do exercises every day, and basically you need your parents to accompany you. I won't elaborate here for the time being. However, in fact, it takes time for many hobbies to persist.

For example, practice some basic skills every day, such as musical instruments. So my suggestion is that this time-consuming interest class has a choice. It doesn't matter if you learn the same. Learning both depends on the conditions. No matter how much, you really can't learn.

Go is very tired for your eyes, but it doesn't matter. If you learn chess offline, you only need to use your mobile phone computer to practice chess at home, but there is also a solution at present, that is, smart chessboard. If you don't want to spend this money, you can talk about our practice methods. Parents replace their opponents with mobile phones.

Just put the opponent's chess on the board, and then put the child's chess on the mobile phone. It's simple. You just need one parent to accompany you. As for playing chess itself, it is tiring for your eyes, reading books and watching music. Playing chess is also very tiring. A project always has many advantages and disadvantages. What's more, you said that there are inevitably many online classes in Go training.

No, you don't want to take online courses. There are some very good offline training institutions, but parents need to know more about them. I have special training for amateur teams here, focusing on quick-acting, interest-cultivating and hosting functions. Many training courses with different emphases are only offline training.

Weiqi is expensive and fake, depending on how you learn and compare. Chess pieces and books in Go are not expensive, and they can be used for a long time. Cheaper than many projects, let alone musical instruments. Class fees are not expensive either. Take my place as an example. A course of 1.5 hours is basically 50- 100 yuan, mostly in 60 yuan, compared with painting and dancing.

Basketball and other common interest classes are cheap. Just learning chess, one class a week is enough. If you really want to practice more, even one-on-one courses are cheaper than most one-on-one courses, unless you have to find a professional chess player one-on-one

Besides, one-on-one combat is basically unnecessary. Of course, taking a career path will cost a lot of money and energy, but the difficulty of the professional examination of Go is simply hell, and it is hard for ordinary people to get into Tsinghua Peking University, so let's not think about it.

Never let children learn Go 3 "How to Play Go" casually.

1, Go is a game in which both sides compete for territory on the board with their own pieces. In the end (both players give up the next game), the one who occupies more land wins.

2. Chess pieces need to be placed at the intersection of lines.

3. Chess: The two sides first decide who will take the black ball and who will take Bai Zi; The player who holds the black hand plays first (except the chess player), and then changes to the player who holds the white hand, one hand at a time, and alternately plays to the end. After the chess pieces are fixed, they are not allowed to move.

"adopt sub-method"

Hold the chess piece with the fingertips of the index finger and the middle finger (middle finger is up, index finger is down). Place the flag gently and accurately at the intersection of the chessboard. Some people are used to holding the national flag between their thumb and forefinger, which is very incorrect and cannot be taken seriously.

"calculation method of victory and defeat"

To put it simply, the victory or defeat in Go can be summarized as follows: whoever surrounds a large area is the winner; On the contrary, it is a loser. There are 36 1 intersections on the chessboard, and the outcome of a game is determined by the number of intersections occupied by both sides of the game.

More precisely, it is determined by the size of the area occupied by both parties. An intersection is a child, and each side takes 180 semichildren as the reduced number. Those who exceed this number win, and those who are less than this number are negative.

China's molecular method is to find one side to calculate. According to Bai Zi's calculation, the destination of Baifang is: 6 Bai Zi +2 cells (x symbol) in the upper left corner and 19 Bai Zi +9 cells in the lower right corner. So the destination of white * * * is 8+28=36.

The picture on the left shows 9 routes, all ***8 1 destination. In the absence of a goal, White needs to score 40.5 points to be considered a draw. So the conclusion is that the white side lost 4.5 points.

Japan uses the comparison method to compare the number of empty items (that is, to calculate the number of X marks in Figure 2). According to this method, white * * * has 1 1 mesh, and black * * * has 19 mesh. White lost eight goals.

The above are some examples, but because the rules involved in Japan and China are different, I will introduce them in detail later! However, mastering these is enough.

"Elements of survival of chess pieces"

In the game, chess pieces live by qi. "Chess" refers to the empty intersection of chess pieces on the chessboard, as shown in the figure. Angry chess pieces (or connected chess pieces) can be left on the board, otherwise they will be taken away and become prisoners of the other side.

If this happens on the chessboard, then all the pieces on point X belong to the other side, and the pieces here can be taken away by the other side immediately. It is against the rules not to mention it.

Qi can decrease and increase. When you have only one breath, you should make up your mind not to let the other person hold the baby.

"How to take chess pieces"

In the game of Go, chess pieces live by "Qi" on the board. If you want to learn to eat, you must understand "Qi". "Qi" is one of the basic terms of Go. As a Weiqi term, "Chi" can also be called "Zi".

In the actual game, one side tightly surrounds one or more flags of the other side, so that all its luck is blocked (that is, all its closely adjacent intersections are occupied), and then the inanimate pieces are removed from the board, which is called "eating".

Chess pieces without "Qi" are lifeless and are not allowed to exist on the chessboard. Once the chess pieces on the board are in an airless state, they can be taken out.