How about wearing fur in winter?

Personal experience, fur is better, from an economic point of view, fur is better!

Let's talk about warmth first We have seen Antarctic rabbits and polar bears in nature, but we have never heard of Antarctic ducks and Arctic geese, have we? A layer of fur, a layer of hair, wind and warmth!

Down is divided into thickness and filler. Everyone knows the influence of thickness on warmth. Fillers can only be seen in professional data. You can search online.

Next, let's talk about cost performance. Contrary to popular belief, I think fur is more economical.

The initial investment often gives people the first impression that it is expensive and cheap, but a piece of fur can be used for at least ten years.

As long as you wear more clothes and have more ventilation, it will turn yellow or fade slightly, even for twenty or thirty years. And down jackets? It seems that the problem of drilling down jackets has not been solved so far, let alone the problem of crossing to keep warm. Is there a down jacket that can be worn for ten years after sun washing? The elbow of the sleeve must be worn naturally! ?

In terms of use cost, dry cleaning down jackets costs a lot of money. Of course, many people can accept washing. What about fur? It is enough to wash once every few years, and many fur merchants will provide preferential cleaning services. Many people say that fur is fine, but in fact it is nothing more than fear of greasy. Can you just pull the nail and splash oil on it with a down jacket? So the so-called exquisiteness is just expensive, which makes you feel reluctant to pull and oil.

Secondly, from the consumer's point of view, talk about the risk of buying. How many consumers can only tell the quality of down jacket filler from the label, and they can't cut it open and weigh it. And fur, different kinds of fur, the same kind of fur with different grades, as long as you look at a few more pieces, most consumers can have a basic judgment and are not easily fooled. Then, if you choose the brand down jacket, you can rest assured, and then compare the prices of the brand down jacket and fur. Are there any advantages?

Of course, I also wear a down jacket. I admit that when I live at home, down jackets are more convenient and comfortable to move than furs.

There are still many people who are against fur based on the principle of animal protection. I just want to say that Europe is a country that considers animal welfare, and I haven't realized that our national conditions are like this. I support animal welfare, but I hope it is not a cover for some people, and I don't want to engage in double standards, especially those who can eat at the dinner table and object to others putting animal fur on their bodies.

And I don't want this to be a yardstick for judging the rich and the poor. In fact, if you can afford it, fur is more economical, which means it is more suitable for the poor. If you can't afford it, it is naturally not included. People who can wear fur like this have at least a certain aura and self-confidence, which is also a personal mental outlook worth promoting. This can't be changed because of a piece of fur, it must be that the person wearing it already has that temperament!

To sum up, I think fur is a warm, economical and beautiful choice if I can afford it and there are no obstacles in animal welfare and other values.