How to treat Sina Finance's evaluation of the film The Wandering Earth's "failure"?

I think Sina Finance's evaluation of wandering earth is a bit too strict. We should look at the achievements of wandering earth, not just the shortcomings of others. Of course, there is still a big gap compared with American blockbusters, but there is still a big breakthrough compared with many domestic science and technology movies before.

Personally, I think the movie Wandering Earth can score 85 points. First of all, the special effects of the film are still very qualified, and the plot is positive and inspiring. The actor's acting skills are ok, so I think the overall score can reach about 85 points.

Sina Finance's evaluation of the film Wandering Earth is that the director and script are unqualified, the scientific definition is also unqualified, and the character performance is also unqualified. I also suspect that other fans who like this movie have aesthetic problems. Personally, I think Sina's financial evaluation view is too extreme, which can only represent their personal views and cannot represent the public's views.

What he said about the definition of science is unqualified, probably because the scientific basis of the film Wandering Earth has not been rigorously scrutinized. But personally, I think this is a movie, not really about scientific research and technology. Many people don't understand the technical terms at all, so they make the general meaning clear so that people can understand it.

He also said that the script written by the director and screenwriter was unqualified. Personally, I think the screenwriter of this film is a bit like the model of commercial films, but it is not unqualified. The whole looks very attractive, at least I watched it from beginning to end in the cinema.

Sina technology said that the actors in this film failed. I think for this kind of science and technology film, the space for actors to play acting is limited. Moreover, our domestic science and technology films have just started and have not yet formed a complete experience. What kind of acting skills actors need is gradually explored.

Finally, Sina Finance's three views on this film failed. Personally, I think this film is very upward. I wonder which three views Sina Finance refers to?