The more people speak on WeChat, the lower their education level? Do highly educated people never speak out?

Let me explain to you that the more pronunciation people have, the lower their academic qualifications are. Do highly educated people never speak out? If you are interested, come and take a look! It has become a powerful tool for communication between people in life. Some people think that the more educated you are, the more likely you are to use words to express your thoughts instead of voice. What do you think of this view? 01

This statement seems to make sense, but it needs to be analyzed as follows. As a social tool, it has become a favorite for people to meet and greet online and discuss private matters and official matters. Various ways of conveying information including text messages, voice, pictures, and videos are packaged in. You can play whatever you want without getting tired. Voice is a direct way of expressing spoken language. People who are outspoken and love to talk like to be direct and speak at the touch of a button. It is just like talking face to face. It is very convenient and does not require hands-on work. It is also in line with the lazy habit of those who talk but do not use hands. In other words, putting aside the cultural level first, those who like voice either have strong verbal expression skills or are too lazy to do it. Those who have poor verbal expression skills prefer to use expressions, pictures, and words, or use words with caution to avoid making mistakes. People who love beauty and express themselves interact through videos or selfies. Express your inner thoughts through body language. These do not seem to prove that those who like to use voice are of low cultural level. Next, let me talk about a phenomenon. Those who are not good at expressing verbally prefer to express themselves in words. Moreover, the more thoughtful and talented people are, the easier it is for them to express their deep thoughts and rich feelings through words. This shows that writing can express profound and rich information more quickly and accurately than spoken language. And the more people are accustomed to this kind of written expression, they will feel uncomfortable expressing it with voice. Written language is a level above spoken language. Because written language reflects a person's language proficiency and cultural accomplishment. It has nothing to do with diploma, but is related to a person's writing ability and talent. However, the level of expressive writing of people with high education is higher than that of people with low education. It can be seen that high education has a great impact on improving a person's quality. Therefore, from this perspective, people who are good at written expression are more talented than people who are good at oral expression. Similarly, those who like pronunciation do not like written expressions. Some people do it to save time, while others have poor written expression skills. It is easy to speak but difficult to write, which makes them appear to be shallow and unable to express their talents.

This seems to reflect that some people do not like written expressions and direct speech because of their low education. Dialectical analysis cannot be generalized.

02

It’s nonsense. I’m also drunk on those people who say they have no quality or culture because they make a lot of speech. I’m the kind of person who doesn’t play DouDou very much. I usually just call when I have something to do. Basically, it’s not something important until I have to make a phone call. Sometimes my friends will ask for phone calls, videos and other general voice messages, because I have already said that I don’t use the Internet much when I have nothing to do, so if there is anything, I can explain it in one or two sentences. I won’t talk about the pronunciation, because the words are indeed clear at a glance, but sometimes I have to write down a sentence or two that I can’t understand. It’s not tiring enough. Indeed, I admit that I am also relatively lazy, but this does not mean that my quality is low. Some friends said this and I didn’t like it. Even if I like to use voice, it is only if it is convenient for both parties. Then my friend said it was not convenient for her to be in the library, so I said you should be busy and I will give it to you later. Your phone call can't delay her study. If it's inconvenient to listen outside, she can convert text. If it still doesn't work, she will tell me that it's not convenient for you to type now, so I will type. After all, it's good. Friends chatting for a while, whatever is convenient for me, there is no way to change it. If it is not convenient for me, for example, if the people around me are listening in silence, and talking will disturb others, then I will look for headphones. If I can’t find them, I will say It's not convenient for me to listen now. It's urgent to type. Let's talk about it later. I don't understand. What do those people who say other people's voices are selfish think? Do you have to listen? Are you cheap? It's inconvenient. If you know how to speak, won’t the other party understand your situation? If you don’t understand, you still listen. I’ll just laugh while cursing you. Is it necessary? By the way, people who say they hate group chat voice, you have to listen. I am convinced while listening to it. I want to say that you have a lot of time. PS, and as far as I know, if there is a group chat, some people like the voice. Ah, because the sound is nice and so on, isn't this the benefit of sound control? It doesn't mean that the person's quality is low.

My parents are old and can’t even understand Pinyin. Both of them are from rural areas. They don’t know how to use smart phones. They are afraid that their money will go out accidentally. Give it to me. Mom has an account and she can only type the names of her family members when typing. Do you still expect her to keep using text when chatting with me? This is nonsense. It has nothing to do with quality. It depends on the individual, the environment, and the person you are looking for. There is no selfish person, but when this is related to selfishness, I am also drunk. It is my personal opinion. If you don’t like it, don’t be arrogant. 03

There is no doubt that the more people like to pronounce words online, the lower their education level will be.

Think about it, if you ask an illiterate person who doesn’t know a few Chinese characters to send you text, aren’t you asking a sow to climb a tree? Some people have not even graduated from elementary school. If you ask them to send you a text, I guarantee, it will take him a long time to write ten words for you, and he will be so anxious that he will be sweating profusely, because this is not easy to come by. In elementary school I have returned the few words I learned to the teacher. In order to write a message for you, I asked my neighbor to find out by looking through the dictionary. Can you not be in a hurry? Some people may have graduated from junior high school, but they have a lot of typos when writing, and their language organization skills are not good. The preface does not match the follower. It was originally intended to express this meaning, but after writing it out in words, it has another meaning. How embarrassing it would be to post something like this. To sum up, these people generally like to send voice messages. They have no choice but to send voice messages. Sending a voice message saves all the trouble. If you force him to send you a voice message, he will have no choice but to break off the relationship with you. Of course, some people are well educated and like to speak. This is just a matter of personal habit. They just open their mouths. Or voice will be used when typing by hand is inconvenient. In fact, sending text can improve your writing level, and it is also a kind of respect for others. It is clear at a glance, do not waste other people's time and expressions (hold your mobile phone and listen to your ear), and do not disturb other people's peace. Friends, it’s better to speak out and don’t let others look down on your culture! 04

I have a junior high school classmate group, a high school classmate group, and a college classmate group. Let’s talk about the junior high school group first. When you open the group, you can hardly see any text. It’s all audio. I have suggested using text many times, but everyone still goes their own way. It sounds slow and noisy, disturbing others, and there is no privacy. Later, he simply refused to listen. Let’s talk about the high school group and the university group. I was admitted to the fast track class in high school. My classmates later went to very good universities, and most of them have successful careers. Therefore, the high school group is the same as the university group. You basically can’t see the voice. The text is clear at a glance. Don't harass others. Furthermore, the content of group chats is also different. The junior high school group just gives out red envelopes and grabs red envelopes every day. There is no other content. It is boring. Compared with the high school group and the university group, the group environment is much more harmonious and healthy. So I personally think that the lower the education level, the more likely you are to use voice. 05

Regarding the use of voice, I have always believed that it should be used by people with a relatively low cultural level. For a person who can't write, or doesn't know how to input text, or even doesn't know the words at all, voice is his best choice. Other than that, you should try to use text as much as possible. If nothing else, just to provide convenience to others. If you can't tell if the other person is comfortable listening to the voice, it's best to use text. If you want the other person to understand you more quickly, it's best to use text. In a word, if you want to make the other party feel convenient, then use words. Conversely, if you want to make it more convenient for yourself, you can use voice. It's that simple. Don't talk about what others can do. After all, what is convenient is for you, not the other person.