The difference between Mozi's silk theory and environmental determinism

If we cut off the influence of Mohism on Mozi, we can exert our imagination alone. Then it can be made to emphasize education or environmental determinism.

But Mohist theory of human nature is only one aspect. This is an emphasis on external roles. The full version of Mohist theory of human nature is:

Human nature is like turbulence, east is east and west is west. Dyeing is one of the "decisive", so dyeing means "temptation" The internal driving force (or internal driving force) that makes human nature gallop is "love and benefit" and so on. Mohism attaches great importance to the analysis of Aili. One third of the article "Daqu" is analyzing and explaining "universal love" with Aili. Therefore, Mohist views on the formation of human beings are both internal and external. "Life is nature", "Life, punishment, knowing where to go". Form and punishment are external. Knowledge is internal. Knowing that there is ambition and wisdom, ambition is "benevolence and righteousness." Benevolence (love) is internal, while righteousness (profit, rules and norms formed by profit-seeking) is external. This so-called benevolence and righteousness are two books.