Joke Collection Website - Talk about mood - Comments on how to write a composition

Comments on how to write a composition

1. How to write composition evaluation

Reading an article, we often see that teachers are used to writing comments on the article, and sometimes teachers also organize students to comment on their classmates' work interactively. At this time, do you feel at a loss and don't know how to write? To this end, the teacher will guide you how to write comments on the article, hoping to help you.

When we comment on the article, we mainly look at whether the structure of the article is complete, whether the language is beautiful, whether the content is rich, whether the imagination is rich and whether the intention is profound. We should pay attention to the following four points:

First, remember some common terms in the three major styles

The three common styles include narrative, explanatory and argumentative. We need to see whether the six elements of the article, such as time, place, character, cause, process and result, are clearly explained, whether the story is complete, whether there are portraits, language descriptions, action descriptions and psychological activities descriptions, and what role these descriptions have played in expressing the characters. Whether the connection and transition between events are natural and whether the details are appropriate. Narrative in a broad sense also includes prose and novels. When it comes to prose, we should think of prose's scattered and concentrated. Environment includes both social environment and natural environment; The plot has four parts: beginning, development, * * * and ending. In short stories, we should also pay attention to the fact that the ending is often unexpected and reasonable. From the point of view of order arrangement, there are sequence, flashback, interpolation and peaceful narration.

Let's talk about argumentative writing. First, we should look at its three elements: whether the argument is clear and whether the viewpoint is correct; Whether the argument is straight to the point or in the text or at the end of the text; The theoretical argument or factual argument used in the argument depends on whether it is novel and close to the times. There are various methods of argument, such as argument, refutation and positive and negative argument, etc. It depends on whether the argument structure is rigorous, etc. In argumentative writing, we also need to see whether the argument serves the argument, etc.

Then look at expository writing. Explanatory writing can be divided into expository writing and expository writing. The purpose of expository writing is to introduce readers to the structure and life habits of things. What should the expository writing answer and why? How to develop, etc. From the perspective of writing order, things are logical order, while things are time, space and procedure order.

The above are some information that we must know about the three major styles. If we want to comment properly, we must understand these basic information, remember some terms, and do not panic when we have food in our hands.

Second, we must understand the criteria for judging articles.

The criteria for judging essays include basic level and development level. Expression includes style, structure, writing and writing; The development level includes profundity, richness, literary talent and creativity. There are 12 grading standards for composition, each of which includes four grades. We must be familiar with these 12 four-grade terms, because this is the basis for our comments on the composition.

Third, we must comment on the article in combination with the specific content of the article. Don't abandon the original text and preach in an empty and abstract way. Those are irrelevant. This is a big taboo for us to write comments on articles. For example, in 26, Heilongjiang College Entrance Examination's perfect composition "Green Tea and Fast Food are Suitable for Both", if we write the comments as follows: "It is an excellent work in the examination room with beautiful rhetoric, grand momentum and profound connotation." This is an invalid comment, because the readers have no idea what is good about the article after reading it. Therefore, we should also write comments in combination with the specific content of the article. For example, the comments should be written as follows: "This examination composition has a good understanding of the materials given in the composition topic, that is, with the development of the times, people's reading methods are changing. The author can firmly grasp this central topic and discuss it, vividly comparing' reading' to' drinking tea', which is vivid and appropriate, and makes us seem to see: in the afternoon, a cup of green tea, a roll of yellowed ancient books. In reading, people's body and mind change unconsciously. The author calls online reading' reading the internet', which corresponds to' reading', just right! The author compares "reading the Internet" to eating "fast food", which reminds us of the booming business in McDonald's. It is a paradise for young people. Yes, most of them are young people. Nutritionists have repeatedly called for it to have no nutrition, but can you deny that it can't satisfy hunger? This is' reading the Internet'. What a rich imagination! It's amazing. Rhetorical methods such as parallelism and quotation are used in many places, and the article is magnificent and rich in connotation, which gives people a strong appeal. "In this way, writing comments based on the specific content of the article makes the advantages and disadvantages of the article concrete, provides specific opinions for people to learn, and makes the comments show their value.

In short, we should make comments based on the specific content of the original text. Make the comments meaningful.

Fourth, there should be a focus when commenting

When commenting on an article, you should not cover everything, but choose the focus you want to comment on, and avoid grabbing at it with eyebrows and beards, so that the characteristics of the article cannot be highlighted. We should start with the idea of the article, the language expression of the article or the innovation angle of the article, and choose the most distinctive highlights of the article to make the comments grasp the characteristics of the article. To avoid avoiding the weight.

To sum up, mastering the above four points, we can write some comments on the article. 2. How to write

in composition evaluation, for example, the composition has improved, the sentences are beautiful and so on. The content of this paper is vivid and rich, the language is novel and refreshing, and the structure is unique and reasonable.

1. The article is detailed, concise, orderly and vivid, which is a masterpiece.

2. Close-ups are unique and interesting. The full text is full of childlike innocence and fun, and it is very kind to read.

3. The article can use fresh and interesting language and describe …. Between the lines, it is full of childlike interest in childhood, and laughter is endless, which is a masterpiece.

4. Proper details and the combination of reality and fiction are the two major characteristics of this article, and the content of ... is richer and more vivid.

all these are ok. please adopt them if you are satisfied. 3. How to write essays

composition evaluation is an important part of composition teaching, a written form of two-way communication between teachers and students, and a teacher's response to students' enthusiasm for writing. Judging from the students' writing psychology, what students are most anxious to know after each writing is the teacher's evaluation of the writing situation, and they can find their sense of self and learning accomplishment from the teacher's comments. Therefore, every sentence in the teacher's comments directly affects the students' psychology of writing and concerns their interest in writing. Writing composition evaluation well is an art that every Chinese teacher should master. So how to write composition evaluation well? Personally, I think:

First, we should have a serious and appreciative attitude of correcting

An educator once said, "The secret of successful education lies in respecting students." In composition teaching, teachers should first treat students with an equal attitude, treat students' compositions with appreciation, and fully respect students' labor achievements.

It's really not easy for students to write a composition as long as they finish it independently. In their own view, it was done through their own efforts. Send it to the teacher for correction, expecting the teacher's affirmation or correction, so as to get strength and inspiration from it, see your achievements and progress, and improve your interest and confidence in writing. If you deny too much, it will have the opposite effect and make students misunderstand and even resent it. Even a poor student's composition, as long as teachers read it carefully with love for them, they can find some advantages. For example, writing is true, it is your own language, there is no plagiarism, you don't write exactly according to the teacher's model, and you are very creative; The examples cited in some places are unique; Have appropriate aphorisms and famous sayings of celebrities; The language is very simple, with simple descriptions, straight to the point and so on. There are always advantages, just look for them with heart. If you find out, give affirmation and praise in the comments, and give appropriate encouragement, the students' writing momentum will definitely improve.

Second, encouraging language is often used in comment

There is a story about an old gentleman who found three unusual compositions when he was reviewing students' compositions. After the title of the first article was written, only the word "fu" was written, and his comment was: "Great potential for composition!" The second composition only has a title, and there is no word "fu". His comment is: "It is wonderful to quote without sending it!" The third composition was simply a blank sheet of paper, and even the title was not written. He still gave a comment: "Innocence is gratifying." This is a joke, of course, with some irony, but it is still very enlightening for us to think about it in turn after laughing. That is to say, when writing composition evaluation, we should pay attention to using more encouraging language. In a sense, a good composition is not necessarily taught by the teacher, but it may be encouraged by the teacher. People often say that education is an art, but in fact it is an art of encouragement, especially when writing about composition evaluation. It is necessary for a Chinese teacher to persist in encouraging, dare to encourage and be good at encouraging students' composition evaluation. Contradictions When I was in elementary school, the teacher wrote this comment at the end of his "Song Dazu's Theory of Releasing Soldiers with a Cup of Wine": "Good pen power, good insight, eye-catching in reading poetry, knowledgeable in argument, and a kid can make it. He worked hard and became a great instrument! " At the end of the article "On Emperor Wen of Sui Dynasty, Emperor Gaozu of Qin Shihuang", the teacher's comments were even more wonderful: "blazing with anger's pen is as sharp as a sword, with a thousand words, like mercury pouring down the ground, pervasive ..." After reading such words, we can fully imagine how deeply moved and inspired the young Mao Dun was at that time. 4. how to write the comments on the composition

1. The article is miscellaneous but not chaotic, and it can be detailed and focused.

2. The atmosphere of ... is fully and just right, and the key point of the article is described delicately and vividly.

3 ... is practical and contains simple and profound philosophy, which makes people feel refreshed and excited.

4. This article is full of * * *, and between the lines, we can understand the little author's love for …. The full text has clear levels and fluent sentences.

5. The case narrative is vivid, concrete and interesting, and it is in the same strain as the previous metaphor. Finally, in a few words, the author showed his feelings for …, which was touching.

6. The article is coherent and forms a complete image.

7. The language of the article is fresh and lively, and the description can grasp the main features of things. The length is short and pithy, and it is worth reading.

8. The content of this article is vivid and rich, the language is novel and refreshing, and the structure is unique and reasonable.

9. The article is detailed, concise, orderly, vivid and concrete, which is a masterpiece.

1. Close-ups are unique and interesting. The full text is full of childlike innocence and fun, and it is very kind to read.

11. The article can use fresh and interesting language and describe …. Between the lines, it is full of childlike interest in childhood, and laughter is endless, which is a masterpiece.

12. Proper details and the combination of reality and fiction are the two major characteristics of this article, and the content of ... is richer and more vivid.

13. The full text is fresh and elegant, kind and euphemistic, simple and unconventional, and it is worth borrowing.

14. The full-text language is vivid and accurate, and the plot is wonderful and tortuous, which seems to bring readers into a happy paradise and make people smile.

15. The full text is easy to understand and interesting.

16. The full text is clear, vivid, compact and interesting.

17. Pay attention to observing specific things and develop appropriate imagination, which is the success of this article.

18. The article melts into the scenery, expresses emotion while painting the scenery, and is good at using analogy to make the article vivid and specific

19. The article is novel in content, reasonable in structure, smooth and coherent, and natural.

2. This article is based on real life, with appropriate materials, innovative ideas, clear paragraphs, natural transition, full of interest and strong readability.

21. The full-text language is fluent, the writing is free and easy, and it can be called a relatively successful work.

22. Although the language in this article is not gorgeous, it is extremely accurate and vivid, full of emotion and true, and it is interesting to read.

23. The structure of the article is concise and reasonable, and the author's understanding of the original text is also very profound and thorough. The full-text language is forceful, hit the floor, which makes people excited and excited.

24. This composition has novel materials, wonderful ideas and lively language. Between the lines, it reveals a fresh breath of life and children's interest.

25. The article narrates the events of … according to the sequence of events. The language is fluent, the level is clear, and it is enjoyable from beginning to end.

26. The full text is lively, the language is fresh, and it is always full of humor and wit, which makes it fun to read.

27. The full-text narrative is concentrated, with simple and fluent language and sincere and touching feelings.

28. The tone of the whole article is relaxed and humorous, which makes people love it.

29. The author is clever in conception, good at choosing points to expand, and the writing is ups and downs, which is thought-provoking.

3. There are many wonderful sentences in the full text, which add some literary interest to the article. 5. How to write composition evaluation's

General Comment

1. The article is miscellaneous but not chaotic, and it can be detailed and focused.

2. Made a delicate and vivid description.

3 ... is practical and contains simple and profound philosophy, which makes people feel refreshed and excited.

4. This article is full of * * *, and the author's love for … can be understood between the lines. The full text has clear levels and fluent sentences.

5. The case narrative is vivid, concrete and interesting, and it is in the same strain as the previous metaphor …. Finally, in a few words, the author showed his feelings for …, which was touching.