I have all the evidence in my case, and my lawyer lost the first and second trials. Is there no hope?

I have met your situation. Let me tell you something:

In the first lawsuit, the facts were clear and the evidence was sufficient, but I felt that the lawsuit was very professional, so I found a seemingly famous lawyer under the recommendation of my friend. After full authorization, the lawyer said that it would be good for him to come forward without going to court. The first instance won, and the other party appealed to the court of second instance. Because the facts of the judgment of the court of first instance are very clear, I thought that the second trial was just a formality, so my lawyer and I didn't pay much attention to the preparations for the second trial. As a result, the second-instance judgment overthrew the first-instance judgment and directly changed the other party's goodwill. Under normal circumstances, the second trial either upheld the original judgment or sent it back for retrial, and it is rare for the second trial to change the judgment. Although there was still a retrial procedure to go, I was really disheartened later.

The reason is not only the objection of the other party to the judgment of the first instance, but also the supplement based on the evidence of the first instance. According to the principle, the judge can not accept the new evidence presented in the second instance, which shows that the judge has made preparations in advance to overturn the judgment of the first instance, which involves judicial justice. On the other hand, the same lawyer obviously despised the challenges faced by the court of second instance and did not even refute the objections raised by the other party at all. This is a failure case caused by the carelessness and irresponsibility of lawyers. To sum up: the reputation of a lawyer is one thing, and irresponsibility is another!

In the second lawsuit, the evidence was conclusive and the facts were clear. I found a young lawyer who just started out. Besides, I have learned my lesson. As long as I have time, I will definitely attend several trials and communicate closely with lawyers at the trial site to prevent accidents. As a result, the first-instance judgment was successfully won. After entering the second trial procedure, I stopped being careless and went all out to improve various assumptions with lawyers. Even lawyers think there is no need to be too cautious. As always, participate in the trial of the court of second instance, closely observe the trend, solve any questions in time, and improve the integrity of the evidence chain. In the end, the court of second instance upheld the original judgment.

Through the above two cases, I personally feel that judicial justice needs to be further improved and deepened. At the same time, entrusting responsible lawyers to seek professional help is much more important than those so-called big-name lawyers who explain the interpretation of laws and regulations! Of course, it is undeniable that famous lawyers have stronger professional judgment. But whether I can do my duty for you needs enough doubt.