My concern is whether Chen Shifeng can escape, and you are still concerned about whether Liu Xin locks the door?

From 12, 1 1, the Jiangge case was heard in the Tokyo court, and the circle of friends did not stop to screen the case, but sadly, many articles did not report the case objectively, rationally and comprehensively, but took the method of taking it out of context from the media to attract attention:

Chen Shifeng said that the knife was handed by Liu Xin. ...

Liu Xin locked the door. ...

Liu Xin has been lying. ...

From the first day, even though there was only Chen Shifeng's confession, almost all the headlines revolved around Liu Xin, not the murderer. It is really doubtful whether this case is about Chen Shifeng or Liu Xin. Even so (the first day, 65438+February, 1 1), Chen Shifeng's defense lawyers did not provide any evidence; Even then, Chen Shifeng's confession was different from the prosecution's point of view, so they naturally accepted the story of a cunning murderer instead of thinking about why Chen Shifeng said so.

The court is trying Chen Shifeng. We judge Liu Xin morally in public opinion.

Let's talk about what happened the night of the murder.

(All the descriptions of the case in this article come from the report of the chief reporter of Phoenix Network in Tokyo after listening in the Tokyo court, rejecting all kinds of online obscenity! )

The descriptions of Liu Xin and Chen Shifeng here are basically the same.

According to Chen's confession, 165438+ arrived at Jiangge's apartment building on the evening of10.2, and then lurked on the third floor. When Jiangge and Liu Xin came back, he went down to the second floor. At that time, Liu Xin had already entered the apartment, and Jiangge half entered the apartment. Then Chen patted Jiangge and motioned for him to speak. Jiangge was very surprised to see Chen Shifeng!

This means that although Chen Yizhi was entangled before, Chen appeared at the door of Jiangge's apartment at the moment, which was unexpected by Jiangge and Liu Xin.

According to Liu Xin, she was in the bathroom, so she didn't know Chen was coming.

According to Chen, Liu knew he was coming, so he gave Jiang his knife and told her to go out and negotiate with himself. Then they talked. Jiangge attacked Chen with a knife, and then Chen stabbed Jiangge when Jiangge defended himself with a knife.

Let's talk about where the knife came from first: the prosecution believes that the knife was brought, and the packaging of the knife was found in the research room of Chen's university.

Besides, what happened on the night of the murder-if you think Liu Xin is a liar and she lied to cover up her motives, let's take a look at the confession of neighbor 203 (Jiangge Zhu201). They are important witnesses and have no motive to lie.

From the confession of 203, it can be clearly seen that:

1. There was no obvious quarrel between Jiangge before and during his murder. The so-called "arguing for 20 minutes before being killed, Liu Xin, why didn't you know it was Chen Shifeng outside" is entirely the imagination of netizens.

2, Jiangge had a scream, but the neighbor said it was like a cat meowing, at least it was not so obvious to call for help. After a long time without online help, it bled to death.

I noticed that when my neighbor opened the door for the first time, he didn't find Jiangge killed. According to all the confessions now, 203 was the only witness who witnessed the murder at that time. She watched it for three seconds, but even so, they just saw "a man squatting next to a woman, groping around her neck with his hand" and thought it was "the woman may be drunk and the man is taking care of her", instead of thinking of murder. Excuse me, Liu Xin behind the door, even through the cat's eye, how can he clearly judge what happened behind the door?

4. During the trial from the first day to the second day, the defense lawyers kept throwing out questions such as "The knife was handed by Liu Xin and the door was locked by Liu Xinsuo. Have you ever questioned Liu Xin", trying to question Liu Xin's integrity and character, so as to overturn Liu Xin's confession and strive for the most favorable result for Chen.

The living can lie, but the dead can't.

1. Chen Shifeng is very cruel. What about "no motive" (defense)? The knife was put on the neck, obviously trying to kill the victim.

2. The "left common carotid artery" was stabbed deeply, bleeding like a waterfall, unable to breathe and call for help within a few seconds, and suddenly lost consciousness. It's not a problem that can't be seen from the ruins, but a fairy is hard to save! Even if Liu Xin opens the door instantly, it won't save Jiangge!

The climax of the public is whether Liu Xin locks the door. Now the strong evidence lies in Liu Xin's alarm recording:

By the way, the rumor that Liu Xin didn't call the police at the first time was broken. And Liu Xin was the first to call the police, and also called the police before the neighbors. Before all the false attacks on Liu Xin, the media rarely clarified for her, made no mention of her wrong behavior, and constantly enlarged the suspicious part of what she said. Isn't it scary enough that the media manipulated public sentiment and deliberately induced the public to give someone an unfair trial? )

There are three sections in alarm recording:1)165438+10: 00 on October 3rd, and alarm recording in Liu Xin; 2) Alarm record of neighboring island 10: 00 on October 3rd165438; 3) 165438+ 10: 22 on October 3rd: Liu Xin recorded the alarm again.

The prosecution played the first half of the first alarm recording at the scene (police in brackets).

There is a doorbell in the recording, about 2-3 seconds. Because the recording was not completely broadcast, it is not clear whether the doorbell has been ringing or only this time.

The whole process, Liu Xin's voice was very panic, even screaming, even the address was wrong.

Grasp this, everyone said, didn't you say you didn't lock the door? You didn't mention ringing the doorbell either?

Therefore, this automatically rises to: "What Liu Xin said is a lie!"

Liu Xin said: I didn't mean to find fault, but please pay attention. The door was locked, but he didn't say who locked it.

People here may scold me.

But looking back at the video of the situation at that time, Liu Xin said that she was in a panic during the whole process (as evidenced by the intermittent address on the alarm recording), and she didn't remember whether she locked the door, but when the police came, she didn't unlock it either, so she felt that she didn't lock the door. She also said that the door had not been pushed open at that time, thinking that Jiangge had locked the door.

So the recording can't explain who locked the door, at least there is no evidence to point to who for the time being.

Moreover, now through the trial, we can finally determine that the door of Jiangge apartment is pushed outward, not inward. Previously, the doors of Japanese apartments were mostly pushed inward, so Liu Xin's suspicion of lying has been broken.

Here's my guess. It must be emphasized that there is no evidence that Liu Xinsuo locked the door. I just wanted to discuss why Liu Xin locked the door, but later I said no.

165438+1On the afternoon of October 2, Chen wanted to pester Liu Xin at the door of Jiangge's apartment. Liu Xin didn't open the door. Jiangge came back and drove Chen away. In the evening, she may just want to repeat what happened in the afternoon, and Jiang drove Chen away.

Without warning, Liu Xin knew in advance that locking the door would kill Jiangge, and there was no evidence to prove that locking the door was malicious.

Imagine if you knew that something terrible had happened outside the door, and it was a girl and your good friend outside, would you open the door and rush out to save people, or would you lock the door and call the police at the first time?

Rational people will choose the latter. Unless the people outside the door are very important people in your life, such as parents, spouses and children.

Otherwise, people are afraid of danger, and their first thought is to protect themselves. Otherwise, neighbor 203 saw Chen go, Jiang fell to the ground and lost blood, and neither of them went out to stop Jiang Ge's bleeding! A truth.

You can call me cold-blooded, and others die for you! The problem is that there is no evidence that Liu knew that he killed the man when he committed the crime. Judging from the performance of Liu's later report, she did not identify it for the first time. An ex-boyfriend who is determined to break up, if he knew he was the murderer, why did Liu Xin cover up Chen?

As for why Liu Xin said he didn't lock the door and didn't hear the doorbell-

On the bright side, she is a person who witnessed the murder, and the trauma she suffered was unexpected by most people. If you have read the detective investigation files, the witness who witnessed the murder was too scared to have memento mori, which is not unique to Liu Xin.

On the bad side, people always accept testimony in their favor. Just like the plot of Rashomon, can you have the courage to tell the public that I locked the door because I was cowardly, afraid and selfish, and I didn't go out to save my good friend?

In fact, the whole case, whether to lock the door is really not the key.

If you don't lock the door, can Jiangge escape the butcher's knife of Chen Shifeng? I'm afraid not.

Liu Canxin left the door unlocked to save Jiangge? Jiangge's fatal injury was that the left common carotid artery was punctured, and there was no possibility of survival after this knife.

If Liu Xin had opened the door, there might have been two victims in this case, not one.

Liu Xin was initially insulted by human flesh because netizens felt that she had all kinds of misconduct in the course of this case:

Pushing Jiangge out of the house, not opening the door, not calling the police, ignoring Jiangge's call for help, fleeing back to China, not assisting the police investigation, and not testifying in court. ...

All these, except locking the door, were overturned.

Others say that locking the door is not the key. The key is that her performance afterwards is too disappointing.

After the event, a large number of WeChat screenshots of Jiang Mu and Liu Xin flowed out on the Internet. If you are interested, you can check it yourself. The Internet is also divided into two groups, Jiang Mu and Liu Xin.

I don't want to analyze these things without substantial evidence, even without context and cause and effect.

I just want to say that you started killing Liu Xin because of negligence in the case (not opening the door, not calling the police, not helping, etc. ). Now, when she seems to have no fault (locking the door is not a fault, even if the police ask her to lock the door, she should lock the door and call the police if she is a little more sensible), when she is bitten by human flesh and falls into violence (threatening Jiang Mu, avoiding Jiang Mu and lying to the public), isn't this an infinite loop?

Now many people on the Internet can't bear to see someone defending Liu Xin. When they talked, they just washed the floor and asked how much Liu Xin gave you.

A person who wears red pants even when meeting the mother of the deceased can have such public relations means and ingenuity to ask the water army to wash the floor for her?

If you are lucky enough not to meet scum, live with your boyfriend and take some underwear photos when you are happy. ...

If you can bravely call the police when your ex-boyfriend comes to haunt you, instead of letting it go. ...

If you can predict that something terrible has happened outside (maybe murder), and you can bravely open the door and fight the gangsters. ...

If you can witness a murder, even if you are traumatized, you can't remember the footage. You must be clear-headed and stand the scrutiny of the whole people. ...

If you can have parents with IQ and EQ online, parents with crisis in public relations, and parents who can calmly deal with your family after being eaten by human flesh …

Congratulations, you are a qualified victim, a perfect victim, and a victim who can stand scrutiny in the spotlight. Otherwise, if you make a mistake, you are scum, a disaster, a liar and a despicable person. ...

It can be said that whoever is Liu Xin will be scolded. At least, I didn't kill Boren, but Boren died because of me. This is an unchangeable fact. After the crisis public relations, I don't know how many people can have superb IQ and EQ to skip all the pits.

If the law convicts a person, he can appeal if he refuses to accept it.

If the law determines that a person is innocent (Liu Xin is a witness, not a defendant), when you raise the stone in your hand and throw it at others, ask yourself, have you read all the testimony carefully? Not just a few big v articles!

Life is so long, how can you not meet a few scum? More unfortunate than meeting scum is meeting a pervert.

That autumn, Liu Xin's normal life was completely torn by an ex-boyfriend who had only been dating for two months and was involved in a huge whirlpool of public opinion. What is more tragic is that Jiangge lost her precious life, and Jiang's mother lost her daughter who lived alone.

What we should hate more is Chen Shifeng, he is a murderer!

When you asked Liu Xin and his parents to apologize, did you ask Chen Shifeng and his parents to apologize?

Do you hate Liu Xin as much as you hate Chen Shifeng?

The biggest tragedy of this matter is that Jiangge has gone. While everyone regrets that a fresh life is gone forever, the object of public trial is actually Jiang Ge's friend before his death. Another victim in this case has been clamoring that "Liu Xin should die with Chen Shifeng", instead of paying attention to the real murderer in this case and worrying about whether he can be lenient.

My concern is whether Chen Shifeng can escape, and you are still concerned about whether Liu Xin locks the door?