Why do you say that the details of "The Wind in Longxi" starring Chen can't stand scrutiny?

As a spy war drama detached from history, The Wind Rises in Longxi skillfully relies on the familiar historical shell to construct a story of "new historical darkness". Starting from the famous Jieting case, the sense of substitution is of course very strong. The TV series has done everything, including restoring various tools of Zhuge Liang, such as Trojan horses and Zhuge Shen crossbows. And tried to restore the state of the Three Kingdoms period with scenes and props.

Originally, I wanted to talk about the rhythm of the play, because it is difficult for me to watch it at double speed, but it is just right to watch it at double speed, but there is still room for the actors to show their acting skills, and there is a musical atmosphere. In fact, there are artistic elements, unless it is a shortcoming, I will not comment, and other characters are not seriously injured. I admit that Liu Yifei helped a lot in destroying secret orders, but think about it, isn't this her job? Is she Wei's spy? To be professional, after she burns the secret, I will let her stay in a small room, and then use all kinds of torture to set up Wei's spy lines. Why don't you ask me? Because I am a righteous Shu spy, I want to restore the Han Dynasty and destroy Wei! Right? Think about it this way, will it be more "home country"?

There is also an unprofessional spy, that is, Chen Gong's wife. Zhai Yue's lines are not that she is thin, but a little funny. The first funny point is that, as a spy of the Five Immortals Sect for many years, she was caught so naturally, sneaking through windows and cupboards. This is really unprofessional. Secondly, you can say that this was revealed by information provided by Candle dragon. The funniest thing about this message is that "spies are high-level women". Think about how many women there are at the top of the Five Immortals Sect. I really can't help laughing.

I criticized it for a long time, but it was not a real criticism. Just some personal understanding, but it does not affect the texture of the play. At the beginning, I said that the props of the play were well dressed and the actors' acting skills were in place, so I hope that on the basis of these high qualities, there can be a script that can stand scrutiny, because history can be scrutinized repeatedly. Since the shell of history is used, is it necessary to stand the test of history before it becomes popular?