Take the above sentence "Li Wanchun and Li Shaochun sound similar, and Li Yuchun sounds similar" as an example. If this is barely a burden, it is indeed a sentence that solves the problem. It is based

Take the above sentence "Li Wanchun and Li Shaochun sound similar, and Li Yuchun sounds similar" as an example. If this is barely a burden, it is indeed a sentence that solves the problem. It is based on the fact that everyone knows that Li Wanchun, Li Shaochun and Li Yuchun are three On the basis of who the individual is. And "Like you, he's not in bed anymore" you have to listen to the first ten minutes of the program to understand. On the contrary, the former's laughter is explosive, while the latter's laughter is long-lasting. Some people may ask, why must the former be more exciting? Because there is no foreshadowing, there is no process of psychological anticipation and judgment. No matter how clever the foreshadowing is, there are smart people who can understand it. The reason why crosstalk can be successful and talk shows rarely can is because it has no foreshadowing at all, so the burden is invisible and absolutely unexpected. Such laughter is easily explosive.

I have heard some less successful talk shows. I think that apart from the reasons for performance ability, many of them confuse telling jokes with talk shows. They think that talk shows are just wearing suits and leather shoes, pretending Act like a billionaire and tell jokes. There are some Internet jokes that can be used immediately, which is troublesome. Many jokes have the same principle as cross talk. Although it is short, it is still a single baggage. It has a self-preparing process, and it loses the sharp and spicy characteristics of a talk show.

Having said that, there are a lot of "sui Liu'er" in today's cross talk performances. This is the actor's language, which is generally small jokes put together to form big jokes. Even some of the pretty good works that appeared in the competition had such traces, but they were put together a little better. But cross talk is an art that pays attention to foreshadowing, logic, and superimposed effects. The better the situation is established on the stage, the louder and longer it will be when the baggage is turned over. With several talk show-style lists of baggage, it is inevitable to just laugh it off.

After solving the core issue of "padding method", everything can be discussed. Why can’t cross talk adapt to television for a long time? Why are talk shows so popular on television? Because TV needs to be fast-paced and exciting. If it can be timeless, it will be better. But explosiveness is the foundation. Why did Jiang Kun's jokes back then adapt so quickly to television? First of all, because Liang Zuo is good at using the language of the times to organize baggage, the language of the times is a common sense foreshadowing. In addition, Jiang Kun's image as a new generation in the 1980s is also a kind of foreshadowing that does not need to be foreshadowed. It takes ten minutes to find out what character he is, so it is naturally easier to laugh faster.

Back to the earliest TV cross talk we talked about. TV crosstalk is, after all, a crosstalk and cannot be completely transformed into a talk show. But it is a TV show and needs the rhythm of a talk show. This requires combining the characteristics of the two. Previous TV crosstalk contestants had gone through a detour: they used talk show-style baggage as filler, and then entered the crosstalk stage, which was top-heavy; they removed the entire segment and reorganized it to shorten the time, which was even more effective with half the effort. In fact, as long as the techniques and logic of cross talk are retained in the overall structure, and the basic tasks of telling stories and establishing characters are retained, the baggage of details, especially the baggage of the first half, is changed, and the habit of foreshadowing is changed, and the creative ideas of talk shows are introduced. , short, flat, fast, crisp and crisp. Of course, this is easier said than done, and it requires specific attention to the creation of each word.

There is also an unavoidable word called "nonsensical". This thing is slightly different from the previous two modes. Whether it is a cross talk or a talk show, the emphasis is on "unexpected and reasonable", while Wu Li Tou requires "unexpected and unreasonable". What you want is to be unreasonable, and what you want to enjoy is not being next to each other. For example, the Miao Wang group, which is very popular this year, has a lot of nonsensical baggage densely arranged in the jokes, creating an exaggerated effect. This is also a way to solve the contradiction between "television" and "cross talk".

This issue is covered in another answer of mine, which talks in more detail about the inertia and blinding nature of humor. Those who are interested can move here. How about the complimenting skills of Qingqu Club crosstalk actor Wang Sheng? - Xin Fusheng's answer

Finally, I would like to talk about the spread of TV cross talk. A friend on Weibo said that you can tell at a glance which actors in the Seven Phase Competition are from Xiaoyuanzi. That's right. Similarly, in today’s gardens, you can tell at a glance which actors are from TV or evening shows. In fact, good actors have clear boundaries between TV shows and gardens.

An old gentleman whom I admire very much once said that for a work, you should create two versions, one for theater and one for video. This is the continuation of the new era and a reflection of professionalism. Just like the effectiveness of Yuanzi crosstalk on TV, the spread of TV crosstalk to theaters is something that should be guarded against. Although a kind of folk art can be used in the hall, it cannot leave the kitchen. If it loses its pyrotechnics for a long time, it cannot be used in the hall.