Many people on the Internet say that Ouyang Xiu's surname is Huang. Is it true?/You don't say.

Ouyang Xiu's surname is Huang? Bullshit! ! ! I've been watching this thing for years, and I really can't help but say a few words. Baidu is too indifferent to the facts. This kind of thing that has not been strictly demonstrated is casually put in the formal and serious Baidu to spread knowledge, and it is also aimed at a generation of literary giant Ouyang Xiu, and its influence is too bad.

If the rumormonger thinks he has discovered a new continent, anyone with a little sense will see the problem clearly. The genealogy of Ouyang family in Jiangxi and Fujian is different from that of Ouyang Tong and Ouyang Shao in the first generation, that is to say, Ouyang family in Jiangxi and Fujian was spread by different people in Jiangxi and Fujian respectively. What is even more funny is that two different factions, far apart, gave birth to the same son Ouyang Xiu. Is it the same name or the wrong score? Those who think they have discovered the new continent are not sure whether their basis is right or wrong. So, what is the truth that the rumor monger didn't figure out? Jiangxi Spectrum and Fujian Spectrum are both wrong because of their long history and constant wars. Jiangxi genealogy can only be recorded by memory because of historical reasons or age reasons. For example, during the Cultural Revolution, many genealogies were burned, resulting in age mismatch and genealogy loss, and there was no way to go back to the past to remedy it. Fujian genealogy is much wrong in history, so in order to repair the whole genealogy, Fujian Ouyang came to Jiangxi to find his roots and connect with Jiangxi genealogy. It is also an honor for them to hang Ouyang Xiu in their name. What I want to say is that hanging is not for no reason. At that time, there was an Ouyang Chen on the Fujian spectrum, paying attention to the word Chen, and there was an Ouyang Bin on the Jiangxi spectrum. Oh, in order to hang Jiangxi genealogy, Fujian genealogy regarded these two people as the same person, Ouyang Bin and Ouyang Chen, almost, so they hung up, because other names were even worse and could not be hung up. Well, there is an Ouyang Xiu on the Jiangxi spectrum and an Ouyang Xiu on the Fujian spectrum. The real Ouyang Xiu only grew up in Jiangxi, and the one in Fujian just put a name on the spectrum to look good. Well, everyone thinks hip-hop. The rumourer regards the name that won glory in the spectrum as the real Ouyang Xiu who was born and raised in Fujian. Look at the history of the Song Dynasty and you will know where Ouyang Xiu was born and raised. Yes, Jiangxi. Okay, next question.

This self-righteous rumor maker thinks that Ouyang Xiu is writing his grandson while compiling his own genealogy, reminding him that Ouyang Xiu is not surnamed Ouyang. Hehe, he doesn't know much about the word heir. Anyway, the heir is not his grandson, but an inheritance, right? Is that what you mean? Is this his idea? What is the heir? The emperor's heir is not the emperor's own son? Have you ever heard of the word adoption? Have you ever heard of the word heir? I've only heard of adoption, but I haven't heard of heirs, have I? Now you see, the heir means to inherit orthodoxy, not to say that he is not a son.

As for the number one scholar Huang mentioned by the rumor monger, it has something to do with Ouyang in Fujian, not with Ouyang in Jiangxi, and not with Ouyang Xiu himself. As we all know, the Biography of Cao Cao records that Cao Cao's surname is Xia Hou, and Ouyang Xiu is also a big shot. Why don't you pay attention to your family name and study Ouyang's genealogy instead of Huang's genealogy? If Ouyang Xiu had no surname Ouyang, he would have mentioned it in his life, his mother would have told him, and he would have been included in the history of the Song Dynasty. How do rumourers spread rumors after a thousand years? Also based on only one heir and two wrong genealogies? It is a joke to say that Ouyang Xiu's reputation dare not be mentioned in the genealogy. Ouyang Xiu was the prime minister at that time, and it was a glorious thing to return to his ancestors. Some people say that he changed dynasties without changing his surname. If Ouyang Xiu's surname is Huang, the emperor will let him change his name. Who else dares to stop him? On the contrary, the emperor actively supported him to compile Ouyang's genealogy, whose real name was Ouyang.

Rumors and Fujian genealogy are more true. Genealogy is used for rough records. After thousands of years, it is very good to keep a general origin. If we have to be serious about the genealogy that has been tossed for thousands of years and say that it can't be a little wrong, we might as well research the myths and legends of China, and then stand on the edge of the cliff like Chang 'e and fly to the moon with two hands and one imagination. If it doesn't work, go to Confucius' genealogy, and then you find that Confucius is also surnamed Huang! !

No matter Huang, Kong or Ouyang, they are all descendants of the Chinese people. After all, everyone should return to a father!

Why did rumors fly all over the sky before and can be seen everywhere in Baidu Encyclopedia Post Bar? Why don't Ouyang's people come out to refute it? This rumor has not been refuted before. It was severely criticized and refuted on some internal websites of Ouyang family. But compared with the rumors flying all over the sky, the scope of rebuttal is too small, and most people have never seen it. Instead, they think that Ouyang is the default. It's time to broaden the scope of this rebuttal. A person's strength is small compared with many people who spread rumors, but rumors will be broken only if they are poked, and they will never be broken until they are poked. I hope most people can stand up together to debunk this rumor and forward this post!