Joke Collection Website - Joke collection - Wuji satirizes the King of Qi for accepting advice, which is a philosophical prose
Wuji satirizes the King of Qi for accepting advice, which is a philosophical prose
First of all, the aesthetic judgments of the wives, concubines, and guests in the story and Zou Ji’s aesthetic judgment of his own beauty and ugliness tell us: Once the subject looks at the object from a utilitarian perspective, it is impossible to make any judgment on the object. Correct aesthetic judgment, on the contrary, misunderstands or even distorts beauty. Pure aesthetic judgment must exclude psychological considerations such as practical utility and other selfish distractions. In other words, pure aesthetic judgment is a super-utilitarian appreciation judgment. Obviously, Zou Ji's wife thinks that Zou Ji is more beautiful than Xu Gong in the north of the city because she prefers him. It can be said that "beauty is in the eye of the beholder". Rational analysis and detailed facts have long proved that this kind of biased aesthetic judgment is essentially a subordinate aesthetic judgment. That is, it is not so much that the wife thinks the husband is beautiful as it is that the wife prefers the husband. The judgment of beauty is subordinate. Among the emotions of preference. Of course the wife will say that her husband is beautiful out of preference and respect for her husband; but whether the husband is actually beautiful or not is another matter. It can be seen that it is impossible to make a correct aesthetic judgment on an object by looking at it from a perspective that is mixed with utilitarian and private thoughts. It can be said that the wife's preference for her husband here is an emotional tendency and private thoughts. As for Zou Ji's concubines and guests, it is even more obvious that Zou Ji is more beautiful than Xu Gong in the north of the city. In the same way, I was afraid of Zou Ji, so when Zou Ji asked her who was more beautiful between herself and Mr. Xu, out of the consideration of flattery, she of course made an erroneous aesthetic judgment insincerely. Because the guests wanted something from Zou Ji, they could only agree and praise Zou Ji as being more beautiful than Xu Gong. The aesthetic judgments of wives, concubines, and guests tell us that pure aesthetic appreciation cannot be mixed with any selfish thoughts. Only by experiencing this non-utilitarian aesthetic experience can the subject make correct appreciation judgments about the object. In fact, Zou Ji's aesthetic judgment of his own appearance is exactly the same. He looked at himself in the mirror, observed carefully, abandoned his selfish thoughts, and found that he was far inferior to Xu Gongmei. Obviously, Zou Ji did not have any utilitarianism in his appreciation judgment. He just looked at himself seriously, objectively, fairly, and non-utilitarianally, and secretly compared himself with Xu Gong. After such non-utilitarian aesthetic thinking, he could Make correct aesthetic judgments about the beauty and ugliness of one's own appearance. Secondly, the story also tells us another aesthetic principle, that is, beauty is revealed in the comparison between objects. Of course, this does not mean that beauty must appear in the mutual contrast of objects, but that beauty can be more clearly and prominently displayed if it can be in a state of relatively contrasting objects. The comparison between beauty and beauty, the contrast between beauty and ugliness, complement each other, the beautiful ones are more beautiful, and the ugly ones are better at ugliness. In fact, the beauty of Zou Ji in the story is greatly inferior when compared with the beauty of Xu Gong in the north of the city. On the other hand, Duke Xu in the north of the city became even more handsome and charming because of Zou Ji. Just imagine, among Zou Ji and Xu Gong in the north of the city, if one of them was missing, would the difference in their beauty be so obvious? This is a comparison between beauty and beauty. Of course, there is also a comparison between beauty and ugliness. The comparison between ugliness and ugliness has the same effect. This is the case with Hugo's "The Hunchback of Notre Dame." The bell-ringer Quasimodo is ugly in appearance but noble in spirit. His adoptive father, Claude, the Archdeacon of Paris, is sanctimonious but despicable in spirit. They are a sharp contrast; the gypsy girl Estamella is virtuous in nature and pure in heart. The lover Fabis is well-dressed and frivolous, which is a sharp contrast; Esmeralda, who is beautiful on the inside and outside, is in sharp contrast with Claude, who is ugly on the outside and tries to possess her; and Ca, who is ugly on the outside but beautiful on the inside, is a sharp contrast Esmeralda, who looks exactly the same as Seymour, forms a strange contrast in appearance. The novel expresses the pursuit of truth, goodness and beauty through the intricate contrast between beauty and ugliness from the appearance to the soul and the conflict between the character's personality and destiny. It stirs up emotional waves in the readers' hearts and leaves a deep impression. It can be seen that contrasting and complementing each other is an important aesthetic principle in real life and artistic trauma. Finally, from the language of people's aesthetic judgments described in the story, we can also see that aesthetic judgments are in a sense a kind of fuzzy judgment. Zou Ji's aesthetic judgment language for his concubines, wives and guests are: "How can Mr. Xu be as beautiful as the king?" "The king is so beautiful, how can Mr. Xu be as beautiful as the king?", "Gong Xu is not as beautiful as the king." Zou Ji's own language of aesthetic judgment It is: "Looking into the mirror and looking at yourself, you are not as far away as you are." The meaning of a series of judgment language is uncertain and unclear. Why is Xu Gong not as beautiful as Zou Jimei? Zou Ji's concubine couldn't explain why. "You are very beautiful." How much more beautiful is Zou Ji than Xu Gong? His wife couldn't tell. "It's not as far away as it is.
"How much worse is he than Xu Gongmei? Zou Ji still can't explain it himself. It can be seen that aesthetic judgment is a vague judgment. Although beauty is a concrete image, the judgment of beauty penetrates the subject's rich and complex emotional experience, and the emotional experience However, it cannot be calculated accurately. Therefore, as an aesthetic judgment mixed with the subject's emotional experience, it is actually a vague judgment. We can say that Zhang San and Li Si are 5 centimeters taller, and we can also judge that Zhang San is prettier than Li Si, but no one can. Knowing how much prettier Zhang San is than Li Si, on the contrary, once anyone raises this question, people will laugh at him. I think the reason is also the ambiguity of aesthetic judgment. In this way, aesthetic judgment is a combination of aesthetic facts that people have already confirmed. Examining this judgment of clarity, we can definitely conclude that aesthetic judgment is the dialectical unity of clarity and ambiguity. Zou Ji satirized the truth that King Najian of Qi told us: Those who are superior can only open up their opinions, adopt the opinions of others, and accept criticism with an open mind. "Zou Ji satirizes the King of Qi and accepts remonstrances" comes from "Warring States Policy·Qi Ceyi", which tells the story of Zou Ji, a counselor of the Qi State during the Warring States Period, who persuaded the monarch to accept remonstrances so that he could open up his voice and improve politics. The article creates an image of a wise man like Zou Ji who is self-aware, good at thinking, and courageous in admonishing. It also shows the image of King Wei of Qi as a wise king who knows his mistakes and can correct them, and obeys his advice readily, as well as his eager desire and great determination to eliminate shortcomings and improve politics. Zou Ji was more than eight feet tall and had a beautiful figure. One morning he put on his clothes, looked in the mirror, and said to his wife: "Who is more beautiful between me and Mr. Xu in the north of the city? His wife said, "You are so beautiful. How can Mr. Xu compare with you?" "Xu Gong in the north of the city was a handsome man from Qi State. Zou Ji didn't believe that he was more beautiful than Xu Gong, so he asked his concubine: "Compared with Xu Gong and me, who is more beautiful? The concubine said: "How can Mr. Xu compare with you?" "The next day, a guest came to visit from outside. Zou Ji sat and talked with him. Zou Ji asked the guest: "Compared with Xu Gong, who is more beautiful? The guest said, "Mr. Xu is not as beautiful as you." "Another day later, Xu Gong came to visit. (Zou Ji) looked at him carefully. He felt that he was not as beautiful as him. When he looked at himself in the mirror, he felt that he was far less beautiful than others. At night, he lay in bed and thought about this. He said: "My wife thinks I'm beautiful because she prefers me; my concubine thinks I'm beautiful because she's afraid of me; my guests think I'm beautiful because they want something from me." So Zou Ji went to court to see King Qi Wei and said, "I know for sure that I am not as beautiful as Duke Xu." But my wife prefers me, my concubines are afraid of me, and my guests want something from me. They all think that I am more beautiful than Mr. Xu. Today's Qi State has a land of thousands of miles and one hundred and twenty cities. All the concubines in the palace and the ministers around him are partial to the king; all ministers in the court are not afraid of the king; and all the people in the country are not wrong. What the king wants: From this, the king must be very deceived. King Qi Wei said: "That's very well said." "So an order was issued: "All ministers, officials, and people who can criticize my faults in person will get high rewards; those who can write letters to advise me will get medium rewards; Those who criticize and discuss my faults in public places, and those who can reach my ears will receive a low-level reward. "As soon as the decree was issued, all the ministers came to give advice, and the palace gate and courtyard were as noisy as a market. A few months later, people would occasionally come in to give advice. A year later, even if they wanted to give advice, there was nothing left to say. When Yan, Zhao, Han, Wei and other countries heard about this, they all came to Qi to pay homage to the king. This is what people call a victory over an enemy country at court. Don't copy what others say or say. For example, if A has a grudge against B or B will harm A's interests, A may exaggerate B's shortcomings and hide B's advantages when evaluating B; if A and B are mutually beneficial, , such as the relationship between several people in the article, then... 2. As a person, you still need to be self-aware. The most difficult person to defeat is yourself. Knowing your true self will help you improve yourself. Take action, dare to put forward opinions and suggestions, learn from doubts, and have self-awareness
- Previous article:Brief introduction of Meilin town
- Next article:What are the funny puns and jokes in different languages?
- Related articles
- Pan Changjiang is back in business! How to treat the influence of Maotai incident?
- Li Kui jy wanted Gui Li to go. Why did he finally kill him?
- Sad quotations from parting
- The Cultural Background of British Humor
- How do college students enrich their after-school life?
- Rewrite the composition from grandma Liu's perspective
- Celebrity ideal and belief story 100 words.
- Humorous sentences about dad taking care of the baby
- A collection of homophonic stalks that make people laugh because of pronunciation (60 sentences)
- What do you mean catch up?