Joke Collection Website - Joke collection - Why should we implement internal supervision? (Only talking about internal supervision of enterprises) and give examples.

Why should we implement internal supervision? (Only talking about internal supervision of enterprises) and give examples.

The purpose of internal supervision of enterprises is: 1. To prevent middle and senior management personnel from corruption and taking kickbacks 2. To prevent employees from stealing and misappropriating company interests 3. To prevent work shirk and irresponsibility 4. To prevent protecting subordinates 5. To prevent the company Economic violations and irregularities within the country, etc. . . Example 1: Due to long-term poor management, a certain project has many problems, serious losses, and heavy debts. The main person in charge of the company is very anxious. He looked through the audit reports of the project in recent years. They were all pretty good. Why did such a serious problem suddenly appear? Obviously, there is something wrong with the company's internal supervision mechanism, or at least the supervision is not in place. Therefore, the main person in charge appointed the business operation department and the audit department to clean up the project. First, the audit department went to the project to understand the basic situation, collected all settlement information, and seemed to be determined to get to the bottom of it. However, when the operating department intervenes, they will first look at the original settlement data and propose a joint cleanup with the audit department. The audit department may know the quality of the personnel in the operating department and firmly disagree with the joint cleanup with the operating department. Your operating department will clean up yours. , our audit department cleans up our. The business department sent out capable officers they knew to clean up the site for many days, and then brought the data back to the headquarters for review. Two months later, the numbers they checked were full of jokes. Even the basic data was not accurate, so naturally they couldn't clear it up. Something went wrong. The operating department forwarded the information to the audit department and asked the audit department to continue cleaning up. The audit department believes that your operating department has been cleaning up for several months and nothing has been found. Do we still need to clean up? Is it necessary for our audit department to offend others? The audit department simply returned the information to the project department and shelved the matter on the pretext of being busy. What problems exist in the project has become an eternal mystery. I don’t know if this is the nature of the internal supervision of state-owned enterprises, but as far as this enterprise is concerned, this kind of supervision is in name only and has no deterrent effect on the following. There may be many reasons for this phenomenon, but there are two fundamental reasons. One is the ability, level and attitude of the main person in charge of the company towards supervision. If a main person in charge of a company with strong ability and high level attaches great importance to the supervision mechanism, Internal supervision will definitely play its due role and show its due power, which will inevitably plug many loopholes in the enterprise and reduce many unnecessary losses. Even if the main person in charge of an enterprise has strong abilities and high standards, if he does not pay attention to the internal supervision of the enterprise and regards internal supervision as a decoration, his internal supervision will definitely be weakened and will not play its due role. For a person in charge of an enterprise with poor ability, low level and no prestige, the supervisors will only go through the motions and have no effect at all. The second is the quality of the personnel in the company's internal supervision department, including their professionalism and professional level. Some people can detect the same problems, some cannot, and some have discovered them and turned a blind eye. Why can’t those self-proclaimed professionals find obvious contract and settlement issues? The answer is that either their professional skills are poor, or their sense of responsibility is problematic, or they are afraid of offending or fooling people. In fact, the internal supervision mechanism of state-owned enterprises is not perfect or plays an insignificant role, which will eventually cause damage to the enterprise and the dismissal of corporate executives. Don’t the main people in charge of the company understand this? Example 2: Let me give you another link: Police remind: It is necessary to strengthen internal supervision and management of enterprises: /gb/jqbb/2008-10/29/content_1043826.htm