Only Americans and French have nuclear carriers? Don't the Russians and the British?

Nuclear-powered aircraft carriers are currently owned only by the United States and France.

American aircraft carriers are now nuclear-powered aircraft carriers. The monitoring range at sea has been greatly enhanced. To be honest, it's not good news for us, but it's hard to catch up with America.

There are also French nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and small horse-drawn carts. It's a joke ... it's just a face project! He piled up the reaction of the nuclear submarine to the power of the aircraft carrier, which caused him to have to overhaul it every five years. But in any case, at least people can independently build conventional power carriers ..... it is worth exploring and learning.

For countries that can independently build aircraft carriers, nuclear power is also a big hurdle. Because the navy is too expensive and the aircraft carrier is more expensive, the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier is particularly expensive.

Russia mentioned by the subject is actually not bad. Nuclear submarines, nuclear icebreakers ... and have more "nuclear experience" than us. Why can't he build them? Not that I don't want to. Every country knows what a nuclear carrier stands for and what it can bring. Because Russia can't get it out and has no complete industrial system, Russia can't even play with conventional power aircraft carriers. Let him play nuclear power? Dream on!

Britain mentioned by the subject has a "Queen Elizabeth" with a displacement of 64,000 tons and a large aircraft carrier. Why is there no nuclear power? Because the emphasis is different. Britain doesn't want to control the global ocean like the United States. People only consider their own land. Why nuclear power? Of course, more importantly, it's the same problem as France ... who doesn't want a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier ... but Britain didn't do it like France.