How to treat the behavior of "repeatedly adding meals" by Chinese Super League referees?

Football is a sad thing worth mentioning in China. In addition to being unable to rush out of Asia in recent decades, China football has become a soft persimmon in Asia, which anyone can pinch. The reason why China football is so weak is mostly due to the low level of professional leagues in China. In order to keep pace with the world, China's professional football league introduced video referee, and this mechanism also added vegetables to China's football league. Super League referee? Repeated meals? Behavior, really hard to ponder, even want to cancel the video referee mechanism. Video referee is an auxiliary means, but it often affects the referee's penalty on the court. Next, let's talk about the video referee of China professional league.

First, the original intention of introducing video referees is to help referees enforce the law better. The situation on the football field is changing rapidly. Sometimes, the referee on the court can't fully understand the situation of the players and the direction of football. At this time, the video referee mechanism introduced can play back the situation on the court, help the referee to judge what the referee ignored on the court, and then give the referee's advice for the referee to judge and decide whether to punish or not.

Second, a good meal for the fans in the Jinglu War was randomly fed by the referee. Beijing Guoan and Shandong Luneng are the hottest teams in the international league. Originally, the game between the two teams was a feast for fans. However, in this game, the video referee repeatedly added materials, making this big meal difficult to swallow, disappointing the fans and questioning the referee's penalty.

Thirdly, there is a joke about video referee among fans. Because of the excessive participation of the video referee, fans made up a joke for the video referee. The content of the joke is that the referee does not punish, and the video referee asks for a penalty. Then the referee thought it was not a foul, and the video referee took out the video of the last game and told the referee that Luneng did foul. In fact, this is a satire on the fans' strong interference with video referees.

What do you think of the referee? Leave me a message.