Which is the highest honor, MVP or FMVP?

Say my own opinion, I personally prefer MVP. Regular season MVP needs a person's strength, real play, 82 games slow and steady, excellent personal data and excellent team record. But the finals MVP needs more luck-your team's strength is to play the finals, and FMVP only watches this series.

This reminds me of football again. In the World Cup, similar to the final of FMVP, the best player gave Gotze, who scored the winning goal for Germany, and the Golden Globe Award similar to the MVP of the regular season was given to Messi. Which honor is higher? For Messi, the Golden Globe Award is a joke, and Messi is even willing to exchange the previous four Golden Globe Awards for the crown of the World Cup. For Gotze, the best player in the final is simply a condiment for the great joy of the World Cup champion.

I think many FMVPs do the same. What FMVP-although it sounds great, it will be great in the future: Lao Tzu is the best player in the champion team! (Ignore the logo first, thank you) In fact, to put it bluntly, the World Cup and the champion are not too dazzling, but the lifelong dream of all professional players. Obsessed with MVP and FMVP, the tangled point is their relationship with the championship. Because the finals MVP is infinitely equal to the championship! However, the regular season MVP really needs a player to reach the peak in all aspects, and to play a stable and excellent role throughout the long season and lead the team to achieve excellent records.

Of course, it is not that the winners of FMVP are not excellent, but that they really have better luck-a super-strong team, and they have played a better role than their teammates in the general competition of this super team, so they naturally got FMVP, and they should be more proud of the championship.