Seriously, you lost?

This is a very unpleasant sentence, which seems to have nothing to do with whether you are serious or not. You want to refute, but you don't know what's wrong. Come on, let's list it according to the logic book style (logic textbook form):

If you are serious, you lose. Four paragraphs, "serious", "you" and "lost".

According to the premise, it is obvious that:

Premise: you are serious; Conclusion: lose.

The word "JIU" means that the conclusion is followed by a hypothesis. Compared with critical reasoning textbooks, this is an implication (if P, then Q).

So this sentence can be rewritten as: seriously (definitely) lose. Reverse rewriting: If you are not serious, then you will not lose.

It's simple. Just think of a counterexample of winning seriously. Really? Too many! Give an example of our old headmaster Tao Xingzhi:

Xiaozhuang celebrated its centenary two months ago, which shows that Tao Xingzhi's seriousness is successful from any angle.

Similarly, is there a counterexample that you will not lose if you are not serious? Too many, don't need examples?

Are there any examples of serious losses and careless wins? Of course, but the obvious weakness of this sentence is that it is too absolute. We have long known that nine times out of ten when we encounter absolute words in making judgment questions, they are wrong. To prove a sentence, you can't find evidence that matches it, but the opposite evidence. You have seen a thousand white swans, and you swear that all swans in the world are white. As long as a black swan appears, you can subvert all your beliefs. This sentence overturns. It's too simple. But I won't just write it here.

List four morphemes at the beginning: Seriously, you lost.

Let's analyze one by one:

First, a serious definition.

Seriously, that is, seriously, welcome.

From this definition, being serious means doing things well, not being stubborn, and even knowing your own mistakes. "If you are serious, you lose" is a joke, saying that some things are just jokes, so you don't have to pursue them too much. Its original meaning of "serious" is "too serious to investigate". It was later misused. If this sentence means not to be too curious about something for entertainment, then there is no problem. What we are talking about here is the misused version, that is, it is not serious when it should be serious.

You, define:

Have you ever thought that it doesn't use "we", "she" and "I" here, and it points the finger at "you"? This is the second unpleasant place of this sentence. It is arbitrary and even unreasonable. You are doing your own thing. An idle man floated up and said, "If you are serious, you will lose." You are discussing the problem with him seriously, and he suddenly said, "If you are serious, you will lose." She said, "The air in America is very sweet". You feel offended. Check the air index. And her attitude is very clear: "it's just a speech, why care so much?" Seriously, you will lose. " Do you really want to hit someone? Do you really want to shout "I'm serious! What's the matter! "

Wait, there's a wiser answer:

Just ... If you want your argument to be accepted by more people in a short time, you should add more absolute words such as "just", "certain", "must" and "affirmation", and at the same time keep your argument as simple as possible, pay attention to only one point as much as possible, and add absolutely confident expression and the tone of hitting the floor. This is much more useful than all-round observation, thinking about the overall situation, reasoning with facts and digging up details. I know this because I am one of the "more people". "If you are serious, you lose" is a very good excuse for being lazy. Use it whenever you meet it. After all, thinking correctly is very tiring.

Lost. Losing is a very subtle concept, "Don't let children lose at the starting line", "The winner is king, and the loser is the enemy". The hidden belief here is that the world is a Maximus arena, and it is a shame to lose and fail. It is terrible not to try because you can't afford to lose, because in the end, you will regret not losing, but not doing it at all. You only live once, don't be too cautious.

With so many ironies, "if you are serious, you will lose". Is this sentence completely inapplicable? Actually, there is. Let me defend the affirmative statement:

Did you find it? The only applicable situation of "if you are serious, you lose" is that the other person doesn't care more than you, and he doesn't care at all, so this frivolous attitude is just what he wants.

Seeing this, in fact, this sentence is not a simple question of truth or falsehood. This is a multiple choice question. What do you want to believe, what is important, do you want to be serious, or do you want to win or lose? Ask yourself, which is more important to you, is it possible to win? (usually)

The best example of seriousness is Phoebe and her sister Ursula. They look exactly alike. Phoebe is eccentric and kind, while Ursula is full of lies and is not professional at all. Ursula's deception won her the favor of more men. She is changeable, and she pretends to be whatever a man wants. So far, Ursula is definitely the spokesperson of "serious will lose". Isn't it just to get married? If you get married, you can leave. Isn't it a job? Do whatever you want. Friends didn't show the ending of Ursula at the end, but it is conceivable that the lie will be exposed one day, and one day, she will be resigned from all her jobs and even have no class capital to continue playing pornography. Accidentally winning is always lucky and short-lived.

I wrote this article so seriously, because five years ago, I would accept the sentence "if I am serious, I will lose" without thinking. Because this is the state of my life at that time.

I used to be a poor student in a good school and a good student in a poor school. Five years ago, when I faced an English teacher who had just met a blind date, I had two choices. If I continue to be careless, I will be worse than her. If I were more serious, I could be closer to the person I like and farther away from the person I hate.

"If you hold your hand too tightly, things will break", and I also regard "seriousness" as "obsession". I don't want to smell inferior perfume in the future, so I decided to be the white rose written by Zhang Ailing.

Serious people have light in their eyes.

The next time you see an assertion, ask a few questions:

Who said it, under what circumstances, to whom, in what tone and for what purpose?

Jump out of a single factor, jump out of either/or. Logic is more important than story, and seriousness is more important than fashion. Being serious may not win, and not being serious may not be happy. You can't think of it now. Five years, ten years, twenty years, we'll see.

Closing arguments. Thank you.