After two months of "disconnection", you will understand: you don't love him that much, you just can't reconcile it, what do you think?

This is not necessarily true. Love is not about answering questions or writing essays. If you can use two months to prove a love, you can let those young men and women who have died in love, been obsessed with it, and waited for decades What do you think of this matter? Is the love they insist on and maintain fake? If you don't love me enough, just say you don't love me enough. Don't make excuses for your lack of specificity.

To know that love is mutual, a popular saying on the Internet recently is very reasonable. It was said by a famous foreign person. The main idea is as follows: "You know how much I want to see you and can't wait to see you." , you also know that I have no dignity at all in front of you, but everything is mutual. My love for you is meaningful only if you love me too and you want to see me." So It doesn't matter how long we have been apart, what matters is whether you love me or not, and whether you still remember me. If you remember me and have each other in your heart, even if we are separated for decades, this love will not necessarily change. Many people may not be able to understand this kind of love, but it does exist. I will not talk about the case. , go find it yourself, there are such love stories in both Eastern and Western civilizations.

In fact, from the perspective of encountering love, we will meet many people who love and love ourselves in this life. It’s just who we meet first and who we fall in love with first. They give up the opportunity to love others and be with others. Love is meaningful only when it happens between two people. Although there is such a thing as love at first sight, most couples get along with each other after weighing the pros and cons. They got together after they fell in love. So, if I love you and you love me, then it is possible for us to be together. Pay attention to the word I use, it is "maybe", not necessarily. Many times it is difficult to fall in love, but it does not mean that we are in love. They will definitely be together, these are two different things. But one thing is certain. If our thoughts are not so paranoid, after being separated from each other, if we meet a similar person of the opposite sex, we may try to get along with the other person. But if our thoughts are paranoid, we may be immersed in You can't extricate yourself from the previous relationship, and this time may be days, years, or even a lifetime.

As for what the questioner said: "You don't love him that much, you just don't want to give in." In fact, this is normal. It's like we want to get into college, but we haven't been able to get into it after considering it dozens of times. At this point, it doesn't matter whether you go to college or not. What's important is to get into college. This is the root of the problem. Therefore, it can only be said that you don't love the other person enough, or that the other person has never loved you at all, and everything is just a matter of "shaving your head and choosing the other person," then this is not love, this is unrequited love. As for what true love is, I think I haven’t figured it out yet at the age of thirty. For me now, love is just a part of my life. If I have a crush on you, I will try to pursue you. If you are interested in me, I will try to pursue you. I also have a good feeling, then we will try to be together, but if I find that you don’t love me after getting along, I will be sad, but I can accept this. After all, love is a matter of two people, not one person. Maybe after breaking up It will be sad, but that's normal.

As for what the questioner said, I actually agree and disagree at the same time. The reason I agree is because it is right. Some people are indeed like this, but the reason why I object is also well-founded, because everyone Everyone is an independent individual, and they have different views and emphasis on love. This sentence only represents the thoughts of some people, not all.