A joke that satirizes women's rights

I am Yu Huanshui, which is really magical and realistic. It seems absurd, but it contains profound meaning. It can be said that irony is applied to the extreme, the details are handled in place, and the social reality is revealed in a humorous way. I think it's worth seeing. Many people have different understandings of the ending, so am I qualified to be Yu Huanshui to complete a spiritual redemption and start over?

But it is such a good play, and the ending is still unavoidable.

On the reasons behind the drop of Douban's score from 8.5 to 7.5 in I am Yu Huanshui, it is intriguing and ironic.

Because of a line that seems to involve women's rights in the play, the Douban score was madly brushed 1 point.

The scene of this line is probably like this: Yu Huanshui and others were tied up, and a woman said that she was a vulnerable group of women and should be released, so the kidnappers didn't come to this routine of female boxing to pursue gender equality. This play is full of satire, depending on what you think. However, this line caused public anger and was retaliated by crazy bad reviews, which soared to 36%.

It also comes from the midday sun. Faced with the irony of some men in Everything is Fine, they all clapped their hands and laughed, lamenting that it was really so-and-so, and then the plot was washed away and they wanted to eat the producers alive. Today's I am Yu Huanshui is also bitter. Some people criticized the "angry uprising" and accused it of insulting women and women's rights. To be honest, if it weren't for this, would the screenwriter have thought of such an ironic scene?

About women's rights, the first half of the play is very real, and the second half is more dramatic. As for the female audience, it is a line that mentions women's rights. But isn't that line ironic? Ironically, people who pursue women's rights are so extreme that they attack female boxing if they don't agree. In fact, there is also satire on men in the plot.

Pursuing women's rights and advocating equality between men and women are qualities that everyone in contemporary society should have. But in the process of pursuing equality between men and women, there are black sheep, which should be criticized. There are only a handful of people who oppose gender equality in the internet, but there are also many people who oppose extreme feminism.

In fact, many arguments stem from the opposition between extreme feminism and opponents. It is natural for female groups to be outspoken about gender discrimination, and they will be supported by the whole public opinion; But we should not be too sensitive. Women are discriminated against by sex in society, which requires the joint efforts of the whole society.

The lines that satirize women's rights are just the fuse.

I don't think that line is insulting women, just referring to the current phenomenon and mocking those who seek personal gain under the banner of women's rights. This has nothing to do with insulting women. It's about feminism, which is disgusting. It's called pastoral feminism, also called female boxing. Maybe some people were stabbed. In order to prove that he is not such a person, the thief jumped three feet.

Those words are not pleasant to hear, but they do exist, and there are phenomena in the script that are hated by writers. Some people who see this are disgusted with this phenomenon and the irony it carries, and think that they and a large number of people have been ridiculed with prejudice.

If you lose, you lose, because the drama party has not taken into account the network atmosphere and audience in recent years: impetuous people, the craze for following the trend, and the audience who can't think rationally ... This is a good drama that needs fine works, but it is also destined to be a drama with serious polarization in the current environment.

Generally speaking, the play is quite good-looking, hiding the flaws, decompressing them, and finally returning to reality.

You don't have to like it, and you don't have to attack it with morality.

People who are angry because there are no positive female roles don't understand this play, do they? There are no good people in this play, or are all good people in the eyes of the audience? Bad guys? , both men and women. Everyone else stands on the opposite side of Yu Huanshui, and Yu Huanshui is not a perfect person. The play satirizes real life through passers-by.

The line of women's rights is really a bit abrupt, because strictly speaking, they are not talking about women's rights, and women's rights do not mean that women are weak. Think about it coming out of their mouths, which is quite consistent. The match is a bully in have it both ways, and the kidnapper says ok? Give you women's rights. He is an illiterate diaosi man who is ignorant and uneducated.

Domestic movies have slightly stepped out of the strange circle of traffic stars since the beginning of online drama. Now it is their turn not only to bear the iron fist of socialism, but also to get some female fists that catch the wind and shadow. It is really unacceptable. I fully support women's reasonable protection of their own interests, such as this kind of behavior of maliciously brushing points by grasping something at the climax of some groups. I really want to use my real name on the Internet as soon as possible. Reality and the Internet should be the same. ?