What does it mean to say "I don't like learning after 90, I don't want to learn after 00, and I won't learn after 05"?

In fact, they are all jokes, which means that the post-90 s students just catch up with the popularity of computers and smart phones when they go to school, which leads many people to subconsciously classify the post-90 s generation as a generation that doesn't like learning (the cognition is extremely wrong, and every generation has children who love learning but don't like learning! ), and the reluctance to learn after 00 means that parents after 00 generally pay more attention to their children's education. The biggest difference between these parents and the post-70s is that they have a strong sense of education. However, due to their inexperience and lack of scientific education methods, most of the children they are taught are unwilling to learn (which is also a paradox, but it has spread more on the Internet, which makes people subconsciously put the unwilling children together with the post-00s. As for not learning after 05, it is a yearning for the times. Mobile payment, high-speed rail travel, smart home and human life have been gradually optimized by technology, but only learning remains unchanged. We have experienced the iteration from private school to classroom. Why haven't the children after 05 completed the iteration from classroom to smart classroom and from learning to smart learning?

Of course, it is also a contradiction that you will not learn after 05. As far as I know, the concept of intelligent learning has existed for a long time, and products that conform to the concept of intelligent learning have come out and been applied to school teaching scenes. The most popular is the OK learning machine. I suggest you know about it. Although we are not young, we must keep pace with the times for the sake of our children. I don't know how old you are. Let's treat you as a peer with children. )