How to write the feeling of the accused robot after reading?

After reading the controlled robot, please refer to the following two model essays.

Fan Wen Yi.

During the summer vacation, I read this robot story, which introduced about seven kinds of robots. The first one was Robbie, one of the most advanced robots produced by American robotics companies at that time. It can't talk. This is a nanny robot, which was sold to the Westons. Their child Gloria likes being with Robbie very much. She stopped smiling when she didn't know where Robbie was.

This robot is very backward, and the other six robots at the back of the book are very advanced, especially the last robot, which turned out to be artificial. It looks exactly like a human being, speaks like a human voice, and can eat. He even ran for mayor. Robots are full of tricks! From the very beginning, I, Robot didn't hold out much hope for the movie I, Robot, and even seemed to be waiting for a joke.

There is a simple reason. I am also a fan of Asimov (in junior high school, I lied to the library that I lost I, Robot and kept it ignominiously for three times the book price), but his old man's I, Robot is actually a collection of short stories including eight short stories. How to show it in movies? Now it seems that I really underestimated the Hollywood screenwriter and director Proia.

I can't help but say that this is a very good movie. Although the image inherits the director's preference for dark tones in The Crow and the City of Darkness, the rhythm is very smooth and comfortable, except for the dull beginning, the whole film is not silent at all. New york in 2035 seems to have some cg traces in the film, but that cool Audi sports car and several "man-machine wars" can definitely satisfy your visual desire.

It is neither as heavy and depressing as blade runner and Artificial Intelligence, nor as empty and boring as Terminator 3. Actions, scenes, actors, including the depth of the script, all give people a just right feeling.

Fan Wener:

"I, Robot" has been shrouded in the aura of "Asimov" from filming to release. Foreign magazines commented that I, Robot fans alone can fill cinemas. But these sci-fi fans are not easy to serve. Before the film was released, it was scolded by many die-hard fans of Asimov, saying that the film was a slap in the face for Asimov.

In fact, the film just used Asimov's "three laws" to build a shelf and borrowed Asimov's name to make a banner. This is called being inspired by books (influenced by novels), not based on on (based on novels). Who exactly is Asimov, worthy of being defended by sci-fi fans? This guy has published more than 500 books in his life, including popular science works in almost all scientific fields, as well as more grand and rigorous science fiction.

The most interesting thing is that this thinking antenna extends to dreamers who are countless light-years away. They never fly or travel, and only write on typewriters for more than 8 hours every day-at the rate of 90 words per minute!

Asimov's most famous works have two series: robot series and base series. I, Robot is the representative work of the former. Eight interesting stories, full of wonderful logical reasoning. For example, in Hide and Seek, the protagonist is faced with the problem of how to find a defective guy from 63 identical intelligent robots. The story was skillfully used in the film, but will? Smith's struggle with robots is far from as wonderful as that written in the book.

The article Inference is even more interesting: the assembled intelligent robot actually thinks that it is the messenger of God. In his view, the "three laws" are laws and regulations put forward by God to help the weak-human beings. How to convince this crazy and stubborn guy on a space station with only two people?

Asimov pushes the protagonist into a dilemma every time, and there is always a dangerous situation that the three laws of robots seem to fail. Then you will find that it is people's misunderstanding of the three laws, not the three laws themselves

In this respect, the movie business follows Asimov's thinking, but unfortunately, this thinking is more conventional in Hollywood, not as unexpected as his own novels-perhaps this is why Asimov was unwilling to cooperate with Hollywood and adapt his works into movies.