CAS determined that Sun Yang did not take doping, and his performance was not cancelled. What does this mean?

This time, the penalty was not that Sun Yang took doping, but that he violently resisted the law! This is fatal, much more serious than drug abuse, banned for eight years! Sun directly announced his retirement.

Back to September 4th, 20 18, three inspectors from doping control agency IDTM went to Sun Yangjia for blood test. Looking back on the whole incident, the cause is not particularly complicated, but a misunderstanding caused by the bickering between the chief prosecutor and Sun Yang. The chief inspector is a citizen of China. At first, all three people called him a fan of Sun Yang, and the two sides were very friendly. But Sun Yang suddenly found that one of his assistants was wearing shorts and slippers, which made him very unhappy. Questioning the identity of the other party, sure enough, this staff member is a temporary worker and has no documents at all.

Although the director opened the company official website to prove his identity, the other two foreign inspection assistants could not prove their identity, and the two sides had a language conflict since then! Then Sun Yang refused to take the blood test bottle away and asked the security guard to open it with a hammer. It seems that Sun Yang did the right thing, but in fact he was too impulsive. Now that the chief inspector has confirmed his identity, he should not resist the inspection. To say the least, even if you question their identity, you should not damage the equipment. You should let them go back to get the certificate and then come back to get something, so it's really hard to tell the difference between breaking the sampling bottle yourself.

Although Sun Yang voiced his appeal, the Chinese Swimming Association also voiced his voice, and everyone was complaining for him! However, the hope of a comeback is slim. It is an indisputable fact that the blood test bottle is broken. Being caught is fatal. Do you really think these institutions are fair? Look at Russia. The whole national team was banned by them. Have all the athletes taken banned drugs? Sun Yang paid the price for his impulsiveness. I hope there will be a turnaround. I hope the Chinese Swimming Association can help him. This is not something he can solve alone.

Sun Yang's case came out. Chinese Academy of Sciences ruled that Sun Yang did not take doping. Sun Yang finally waited for the day when he was innocent. Unexpectedly, CAS banned Sun Yang for eight years on the grounds of Sun Yang's violent resistance test, with immediate effect. So, here's the problem. CAS ruled that Sun Yang did not take doping, saying that the results would not be cancelled, but Sun Yang was suspended. What does this mean? This shows that this is a naked conspiracy. Why do you say that? Ok, please listen to me and tell me in detail.

I believe CAS and WADA will be happy to cancel Sun Yang's score, but Sun Yang is innocent, and he earned his score by himself, so CAS can only cancel Sun Yang's score.

Let's analyze this matter. Whether the Sun Yang incident was caused by doping or not, the focus at that time was whether Sun Yang had taken doping. Ironically, the final verdict was not based on whether Sun Yang used stimulants, but on what Sun Yang called violent anti-inspection. I would like to ask, when the inspectors are all temporary workers, they are not qualified and do not conform to the procedures. Why should Sun Yang comply with such inspection? What is the basis for this? Why do other athletes draw blood according to the regulations, but Sun Yang is a farce that does not meet the regulations? I must not believe that it is not targeted.

It has been more than 580 days since this incident. Why did it take so long? Why not give Sun Yang time to complain? You know, without a year or so, there is no process that can't produce results. I think all this is premeditated, and this premeditated is to prevent Sun Yang from appearing in the Tokyo Olympics.

Maybe after a year or so, CAS will dismiss its judgment as wrong, but what's the use? The Tokyo Olympic Games has been held and medals have been distributed. Will Sun Yang still have a place to play? Sun Yang is 29 years old, and a year without a game is enough to ruin Sun Yang.

CAS didn't cancel Sun Yang's performance, which proved that Sun Yang was fine and wanted to fight back violently against the plot. In the past, the China Swimming Federation made too many compromises, but this time I hope they will not give in again and let everyone down. This is not a matter for Sun Yang alone.

As long as Sun Yang is number one in the world, someone will help him.

If you want to understand one thing, I have an experience, which is to sort out the timeline and sort out the events in chronological order. Of course, you must combine the views, opinions and attitudes of both sides and list the timeline realistically, especially the facts, which must be true and accurate. Opinions can be divided, but the facts must be accurate.

I combed the following timeline, and the simple process of the event is as follows:

1, time, from the evening of September 4th to the early morning of September 5th, 20 18, location, Sun Yang residence.

2. Event: International Doping Organization conducted flight sampling during non-competition. Results: Blood samples were collected, but the blood storage container was destroyed and no urine samples were collected.

This inspector was legal at that time. The problem lies with two assistants. First of all, they don't have the qualification certificate of inspector. Second, they have no official authorization. One of them showed his ID card. Please pay attention to the resident ID card. The other showed a nurse's professional skill certificate. (It is conceivable that these two are from China. )

4. Sun Yang insists that testing assistants without legal status can't take part in testing, and only those with ID cards are excluded.

5. At about 1 1: 35 in the evening, Sun Yang cooperated to complete the blood collection, and the inspectors kept it in a refrigerated container. Sun Yang found his assistant taking photos and videos with his mobile phone.

6. Sun Yang called the organization and reported to Mr. Chen, the swimming team leader of China national team. Mr. Chen believes that every member of the inspection team should have legal identity and legal authorization, otherwise, they can't provide samples.

7. Due to the lack of supervision by legal testing assistants, urine samples cannot be collected. Sun Yang suggested waiting for the legal assistant to be present before collecting, but the inspector refused.

8. The inspector wouldn't let Sun Yang pee without supervision, so Sun Yang couldn't hold back and went to pee.

9. Sun Yang checked the assistant's mobile phone, and there were indeed candid photos. About 10 photos were deleted. Are you Sun Yangfan? Understandable, but unprofessional)

On 10 and 10 in the morning, the team doctor from Sun Yang arrived at Sun Yangjia. The doctor found that the two assistants brought by the inspectors had no qualification certificates and no authorization certificates. Nurse qualification certificate is not a statutory examination certificate. The doctor refused to take the blood sample.

1 1. The doctor wrote a description of the situation that night. The main content is that these two assistants are illegal and irrelevant. The conclusion is that Sun Yang can't collect blood samples and urine samples, and the collected blood samples can't be taken away. All members of the inspection team signed the report for confirmation. This situation shows that it is very critical and the best evidence.

12. The inspector refused to take away the blood samples refrigerated for Sun Yang. Sun Yang's mother found the security guard with a hammer, and Sun Yang broke the blood storage container and took the blood sample.

13. As a result, Dr. Sun Yang took away an intact and broken blood storage container. He's here to keep the blood samples collected.

14, at 3 am on September 5th 15, we went back to our home to find our mother.

After this incident, there was a dispute between the two sides, and the incident was characterized as a "violent anti-inspection storm." In fact, from the perspective of handling public opinion, if this issue is confirmed, Sun Yang will be at a disadvantage. If there is a rational person, this matter should be characterized as "Sun Yang refused to test banned doping".

It is said that Yang Yang of China is also the vice chairman of the World Anti-Doping Agency. I thought it was a great position at first, but now it seems to be a decoration!

I watched the video of Sun Yang's urine test this morning. It is normal for Sun Yang to talk to three people. The three people who are testing look at a piece of paper and read it over and over again, and sign it separately.

It seems that Sun Yang found that they were not properly dressed, which meant a little joking, and offered to check their certificates. One of them took out his papers, and the other two couldn't take them out at all. At this time, Sun Yang had an opinion on this. His practice was to let the security guard take a urine sample, thus starting his own world doping agency war.

Can I use the analogy of police enforcement? When police comrades enforce the law, there must be more than two people, or a regular policeman with two police assistants (or with the permission of the public security organ) before they can enforce the law.

As for the flight drug tests, Sun Yang's mistake lies in whether they are true or not. Don't touch the urine bottle, just leave it there, let them confirm their identity again and prove whether it meets the requirements of international flight drug testing.

This behavior gave the World Anti-Doping Agency an excuse to launch a large-scale action similar to banning Russian sports, starting with Sun Yang, and then stepping up encirclement and suppression of those who did not conform to the ideology of the World Anti-Doping Agency.

Think about how many Americans get immunity and how many Russians get immunity. Can you imagine that the World Anti-Doping Agency is just? Americans donate nearly $3 million to the World Anti-Doping Agency every year.

So, Sun Yang was definitely murdered by them with money and colored glasses this time.

I can't explain anything. Here, I'll give you a good explanation of the ins and outs of the Sun Yang incident, and let you know what's going on.

First of all, the reason why CAS, the international sports punching court, punishes Sun Yang is-violent confrontation inspection. That is to say, he didn't cooperate with the testing procedure, his team destroyed the samples, and there was no evidence to prove that Sun Yang had taken doping, so Sun Yang's previous achievements were valid.

Secondly, everyone's objection to this matter is that many people, like Sun Yang's team, think that the testing party has no testing certificate, so it is not qualified to test, which is a different understanding of the rules. However, the actual situation is that WADA (tester) issued the authorization document issued by FINA to IDTM, and the other two testers (blood tester and urine tester) also presented the nurse qualification certificate and ID card respectively, so the tester's identity conforms to ISIT regulations. What's even more difficult to make sense is that Sun Yang has accepted 180 doping tests before, 69 of which were carried out by authorization documents issued by sampling agency (IDTM), and Sun Yang only raised doubts this time.

Finally, Sun Yang was banned for eight years because he had violated the rules once before, and this time he was a recidivist, so he was punished for both crimes.

Sun Yang's team mishandled the matter. Even if they think that the other party is not qualified for testing, they should keep the samples and then raise objections or complaints instead of choosing to destroy them. This is tantamount to cornering yourself.

As the captain of China swimming team, Sun Yang won the Grand Slam in men's freestyle, which is a flag of China sports.

Just before the Tokyo Olympics today, CAS banned Sun Yang for eight years, effective from now on, which is equivalent to the end of his sports career. As for the negotiation within 15 days, it is also very slim. If the country speaks for him, the situation may change.

Don't say Sun Yang, say Veda. The anti-doping laboratory in Lausanne, Switzerland, has a lot of evidence that can bring down Olympic athletes. Since 2008, urine samples and blood samples of thousands of athletes have been stored here. With the emergence of the latest detection technology, these samples may be re-detected. The International Olympic Committee extended the shelf life of samples from 8 years to 10 years, which gave scientists more time to develop new detection technologies.

In 2003, the doping scandal at Barco Laboratories in San Francisco shocked the American sports world. This laboratory provides stimulants for many top American athletes, and the research and development level of stimulants in the United States, the largest country in sports, is in the leading position in the world. The FBI investigation has discredited many athletes.

Armstrong, the king of the seventh Tour de France, retired in August 2005 with the honor of the seventh champion. Soon after, it was revealed that he started taking EPO from 1999, and had been accused of it five times before.

1August 2, 9981day, Griffith Kojna, the fastest girl in American track and field, died suddenly at home at the age of 38. Although the doctor diagnosed her death as a heart attack, it is an indisputable fact that she had taken steroids before. It was doping that caused her early death.

Before Bolt was born, American carl lewis ruled the world sprint. Nine gold medals in the Olympic Games proved that he was the first man of that era. Lewis was also accused of taking stimulants during his sports career, but both were sheltered by the US Olympic Committee. It was not until Lewis retired that he admitted to taking banned drugs under the constant questioning of IAAF, but the doping test was still in its infancy at that time, and finally Kanin-Lewis was exempted from punishment and saved the gold medal.

There are too many "heroes" in American sports, such as Montgomery, Jones, Guy and gatling. They are all "addicts".

The latest drug abuse scandal in Australia is that Nana Jack, a female swimmer, withdrew from the World Championships in South Korea "for personal reasons" because she failed the doping test last July.

China's "Ma Jiajun" in early track and field and "Five Golden Flowers" in 1990s were both accused of taking stimulants. It's just that the management of stimulants in those days was still in its infancy, and eventually it all went away.

The 2008 Beijing Olympic Games is the most successful Olympic Games in history. China won the first gold medal in the name of the host for the first time, but nine years later, in 20 17, three of the four gold medals won by women's weightlifting were taken back because of this stimulant.

Australian swimmer Hoey repeatedly accused Sun Yang of "taking drugs" and Sun Yang was suspended for a short time, but only Sun Yang knew the reason. For 29-year-old Sun Yang, this age is the golden age to create achievements. For the people of the whole country, being banned for eight years will definitely bring constant complaints, because the Tokyo Olympic Games will be held in a few months. The fall of Sun Yang, a flag of China sports, is an extremely serious matter for China sports. China will strive for it, but CAS has not deprived Sun Yang of the gold medal. Does anyone have proof? Otherwise, how can CAS be confident?

I have been following the Sun Yang incident for many days, and I have read a lot of relevant materials. Personally, I think this incident is actually a typical "Chinese-style" domestic event that has been "internationalized". Let me tidy up.

1. A qualified chief inspector randomly asked two "blood test officers" and "urine test officers" to bring Sun Yangfei for inspection. (Chinese style)

2. When Sun Yang saw someone coming to check, he just started to cooperate habitually and didn't carry out all the qualification checks. (Chinese style)

3, "urine tester" is actually a fan, taking pictures on the spot. (Chinese style)

4. When Sun Yang finds something wrong, stop the inspection and ask relevant experts. Experts say blood samples can't be given. Tell the Chief Inspector what you have to do or I'll let you do what you want. (Chinese style)

5. When the chief inspector saw that my manners were serious, he also contacted the relevant personnel and said that I was disorderly. (Chinese style)

6. The director said, I can give you a blood sample without inspection, but all my instruments and equipment have to be taken away. So the security guard smashed the bottle and left a blood sample. As for your equipment, hehe. (Chinese style)

If this matter is confined to China, it can actually be ended for the benefit of all parties. But after this incident was reported to WADA, the nature changed. Shit, opportunity, great opportunity, this is obviously a refusal to inspect.

So this punishment has nothing to do with whether or not to take stimulants.

Rational analysis! Reports are flying all over the sky, so stay awake! Don't follow the trend!

First, let's not talk about Sun Yang. Here, I interrupt a news. At the end of 20 19, American swimmer Connor dwyer was banned for 20 months for taking stimulants. He is a two-time Olympic gold medalist! As the saying goes, there is no harm without comparison. It is obviously unfair to ban doping for 20 months and not doping for 8 years! Even if it is a violent counter-inspection, what evidence is there? The detailed process of this matter, the relationship between people and all kinds of details have not surfaced. Sun Yang has violent anti-inspection! This shows that Sun Yang was beaten by routine or fishing law enforcement!

Second,

What do you mean Sun Yang's grades will not be cancelled? This strongly shows that Sun Yang didn't take stimulants! In fact, this is also the bottom line of the Sports Arbitration Court in this penalty! Secretary-General Lei Bo gave two bases for the judgment. First, Sun Yang did not cooperate with WADA to complete the normal flight drug test. Second, Sun Yang has no sufficient reason to explain why he destroyed the samples, and he violated the corresponding anti-doping inspection regulations.

Frankly speaking, the reasons given by the Secretary-General are very good, but they are also full of loopholes. Sun Yang didn't cooperate with the flight drug test, so is this flight drug test legal? What do you mean, there is not enough reason? He destroyed the samples not because he questioned the qualifications of those inspectors! Of course, nothing here is useful. To put it bluntly, Sun Yang has been targeted, targeted by some interest groups, and WADA, the world anti-doping agency, bullies the weak and acts as the executioner! The sports arbitration court is just a puppet! Anyway, we should all be in Sun Yang, trust Sun Yang! To say the least, even if the crime of violent anti-inspection is convicted, which article in the anti-doping agency's document says that it will be banned for eight years? If you frame it, you will be cursed! ! !

On February 28th, Beijing time, the court of arbitration for sports (CAS) announced that Sun Yang had been banned for eight years for violating the World Anti-Doping Regulations, with immediate effect. In addition, when the media questioned the standardization of the testing procedures, the Chinese Academy of Sciences said that the chief inspector was qualified. Then the question is, Sun Yang didn't break the blood sample. Why was he banned for eight years?

Figure 1: statement by spokesman of Chinese Academy of Sciences

CAS claims that Sun Yang's previous achievements are effective, which means that Sun Yang has never taken "illegal drugs" before. Should foreign media and clowns like Horton, Scott and Lily Kim who vilify Sun Yang apologize?

Even more ridiculous, CAS gave reasons for banning Sun Yang, because it believed that there was "violent resistance to inspection" in Sun Yang. Ask three questions: First, are the inspectors qualified? Second, does the testing process meet the requirements? Third, did Sun Yang smash the sample himself?

Figure 2: Sun Yang is swimming.

On September 4th, 20 18, four people met with, one of whom was a driver (without professional qualification), and the other three were Ms. Yang, the director, Ms. Huang, the blood tester, and Mr. Wu, the urine tester.

However, in the process of testing, Sun Yang found that blood testers and urine testers lacked effective testing qualifications, so he decided that the testing procedures did not meet the requirements. In order to protect personal rights from infringement, Sun Yang refused the follow-up test.

Figure 3: Inspector's signature

More importantly, Sun Yang has relevant physical evidence, that is, video materials at that time and a handwritten material signed by inspectors. The relevant witnesses and physical evidence provided by Sun Yang proved that there were great problems in the testing procedure at that time, which did not meet the requirements.

Interestingly, when Sun Yang provided a blood test officer and a urine test officer who did not meet the testing qualification, CAS also indicated that there was no problem with the director. So in the sense of CAS, as long as there is no problem with the director, it can be concluded that the testing procedure can be carried out normally?

Figure 4: Sun Yang appears in court.

Excuse me, did Sun Yang himself break the test sample? Sun Yang, like the chief complainant, meets the requirements and voluntarily accepts the test, but the real "violent resistance" should be vigilant!

In other words, the chief inspector arranged for two unqualified inspectors to carry out the inspection, which is considered to be in compliance with the regulations. Then Sun Yang arranged for the same unrelated security guards to smash the samples. Is there a problem? Enough to see the double standard!

If Sun Yang is punished for violently resisting inspection, should the director also be punished for abusing his power and not complying with the regulations? Isn't this a naked double standard?

Figure 5: Sun Yang

When a good athlete is tested by a group of people without any qualifications, can't he refuse? Moreover, it is not Sun Yang himself who really implements "violent anti-inspection". Why are you accusing him of something he didn't do?