Apple claims that "550,000 tons of ore have been saved without a charger". Do you agree that this saving is necessary?

Most users are willing to call this saving "unnecessary saving". Apple's so-called saving of 550 thousand tons of ore is only relative to Apple's saving, and the user's demand has not decreased.

For users who use Apple mobile phones, chargers are essential. When Apple buys a mobile phone, it only sends bare metal, so users naturally go back to buy a charger. It doesn't necessarily save ore, but it makes users spend one more item. Naturally, there will be friends who used to use Apple mobile phones and chargers, but now they charge quickly. I believe most users are willing to use fast charging.

Apple claims that it is environmentally friendly to save ore without a charger, but it actually pushes users to a higher level of consumption. There is no charger, but the price of mobile phones has not decreased, and the sales of chargers have increased at a speed visible to the naked eye. To put it bluntly, this is just a disguised means of collecting money. If it is really environmentally friendly, we can slow down the speed of upgrading mobile phones and pay attention to quality.

Under the guise of saving ore and protecting the environment, the cost is passed on to consumers. Such a festival can't be called "saving" in the strict sense, but it is unscrupulous and unscrupulous. This kind of sales method really makes Apple earn a lot of money and brings huge sales.